summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/irqchip
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-04-17Merge branch 'irq/gic-v4.1-fixes-5.7' into irq/irqchip-5.7Marc Zyngier2-4/+27
2020-04-17irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1: Make bcm7038_l1_of_init() staticJason Yan1-1/+1
Fix the following sparse warning: drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c:419:12: warning: symbol 'bcm7038_l1_of_init' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200417074036.46594-1-yanaijie@huawei.com
2020-04-17irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu: Make legacy_bindings staticJason Yan1-1/+1
Fix the following sparse warning: drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c:69:1: warning: symbol 'legacy_bindings' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200417074046.46771-1-yanaijie@huawei.com
2020-04-17irqchip/meson-gpio: Fix HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock orderMarc Zyngier1-8/+10
Running a lockedp-enabled kernel on a vim3l board (Amlogic SM1) leads to the following splat: [ 13.557138] WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected [ 13.587485] ip/456 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: [ 13.625922] ffff000059908cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq+0xf8/0x8d8 [ 13.632273] which would create a new lock dependency: [ 13.637272] (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (&ctl->lock){+.+.}-{2:2} [ 13.644209] [ 13.644209] but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: [ 13.654122] (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2} [ 13.654125] [ 13.654125] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: [ 13.664759] lock_acquire+0xec/0x368 [ 13.666926] _raw_spin_lock+0x60/0x88 [ 13.669979] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x30/0x178 [ 13.674082] generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50 [ 13.678098] __handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xc8 [ 13.682209] gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xb0 [ 13.685872] el1_irq+0xd0/0x180 [ 13.689010] arch_cpu_idle+0x40/0x220 [ 13.692732] default_idle_call+0x54/0x60 [ 13.696677] do_idle+0x23c/0x2e8 [ 13.699903] cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x50 [ 13.703852] rest_init+0x1e0/0x2b4 [ 13.707301] arch_call_rest_init+0x18/0x24 [ 13.711449] start_kernel+0x4ec/0x51c [ 13.715167] [ 13.715167] to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: [ 13.722426] (&ctl->lock){+.+.}-{2:2} [ 13.722430] [ 13.722430] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: [ 13.732319] ... [ 13.732324] lock_acquire+0xec/0x368 [ 13.735985] _raw_spin_lock+0x60/0x88 [ 13.739452] meson_gpio_irq_domain_alloc+0xcc/0x290 [ 13.744392] irq_domain_alloc_irqs_hierarchy+0x24/0x60 [ 13.749586] __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x160/0x2f0 [ 13.754254] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0x118/0x320 [ 13.759073] irq_create_of_mapping+0x78/0xa0 [ 13.763360] of_irq_get+0x6c/0x80 [ 13.766701] of_mdiobus_register_phy+0x10c/0x238 [of_mdio] [ 13.772227] of_mdiobus_register+0x158/0x380 [of_mdio] [ 13.777388] mdio_mux_init+0x180/0x2e8 [mdio_mux] [ 13.782128] g12a_mdio_mux_probe+0x290/0x398 [mdio_mux_meson_g12a] [ 13.788349] platform_drv_probe+0x5c/0xb0 [ 13.792379] really_probe+0xe4/0x448 [ 13.795979] driver_probe_device+0xe8/0x140 [ 13.800189] __device_attach_driver+0x94/0x120 [ 13.804639] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xd8 [ 13.808474] __device_attach+0xe4/0x168 [ 13.812361] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 [ 13.816592] bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0 [ 13.820430] deferred_probe_work_func+0xa8/0x100 [ 13.825064] process_one_work+0x264/0x688 [ 13.829088] worker_thread+0x4c/0x458 [ 13.832768] kthread+0x154/0x158 [ 13.836018] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 [ 13.839612] [ 13.839612] other info that might help us debug this: [ 13.839612] [ 13.850354] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 13.850354] [ 13.855720] CPU0 CPU1 [ 13.858774] ---- ---- [ 13.863242] lock(&ctl->lock); [ 13.866330] local_irq_disable(); [ 13.872233] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 13.878705] lock(&ctl->lock); [ 13.884297] <Interrupt> [ 13.886857] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 13.891014] [ 13.891014] *** DEADLOCK *** The issue can occur when CPU1 is doing something like irq_set_type() and CPU0 performing an interrupt allocation, for example. Taking an interrupt (like the one being reconfigured) would lead to a deadlock. A solution to this is: - Reorder the locking so that meson_gpio_irq_update_bits takes the lock itself at all times, instead of relying on the caller to lock or not, hence making the RMW sequence atomic, - Rework the critical section in meson_gpio_irq_request_channel to only cover the allocation itself, and let the gpio_irq_sel_pin callback deal with its own locking if required, - Take the private spin-lock with interrupts disabled at all times Reviewed-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2020-04-17irqchip/sifive-plic: Fix maximum priority threshold valueAtish Patra1-1/+1
As per the PLIC specification, maximum priority threshold value is 0x7 not 0xF. Even though it doesn't cause any error in qemu/hifive unleashed, there may be some implementation which checks the upper bound resulting in an illegal access. Fixes: ccbe80bad571 ("irqchip/sifive-plic: Enable/Disable external interrupts upon cpu online/offline") Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200403014609.71831-1-atish.patra@wdc.com
2020-04-17irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Fix processing of masked irqsGrygorii Strashko1-1/+2
The ti_sci_inta_irq_handler() does not take into account INTA IRQs state (masked/unmasked) as it uses INTA_STATUS_CLEAR_j register to get INTA IRQs status, which provides raw status value. This causes hard IRQ handlers to be called or threaded handlers to be scheduled many times even if corresponding INTA IRQ is masked. Above, first of all, affects the LEVEL interrupts processing and causes unexpected behavior up the system stack or crash. Fix it by using the Interrupt Masked Status INTA_STATUSM_j register which provides masked INTA IRQs status. Fixes: 9f1463b86c13 ("irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for Interrupt Aggregator driver") Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200408191532.31252-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2020-04-17irqchip/mbigen: Free msi_desc on device teardownZenghui Yu1-1/+7
Using irq_domain_free_irqs_common() on the irqdomain free path will leave the MSI descriptor unfreed when platform devices get removed. Properly free it by MSI domain free function. Fixes: 9650c60ebfec0 ("irqchip/mbigen: Create irq domain for each mbigen device") Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200408114352.1604-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com
2020-04-16irqchip/gic-v4.1: Update effective affinity of virtual SGIsMarc Zyngier1-0/+1
Although the vSGIs are not directly visible to the host, they still get moved around by the CPU hotplug, for example. This results in the kernel moaning on the console, such as: genirq: irq_chip GICv4.1-sgi did not update eff. affinity mask of irq 38 Updating the effective affinity on set_affinity() fixes it. Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2020-04-16irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add support for VPENDBASER's Dirty+Valid signalingMarc Zyngier2-4/+26
When a vPE is made resident, the GIC starts parsing the virtual pending table to deliver pending interrupts. This takes place asynchronously, and can at times take a long while. Long enough that the vcpu enters the guest and hits WFI before any interrupt has been signaled yet. The vcpu then exits, blocks, and now gets a doorbell. Rince, repeat. In order to avoid the above, a (optional on GICv4, mandatory on v4.1) feature allows the GIC to feedback to the hypervisor whether it is done parsing the VPT by clearing the GICR_VPENDBASER.Dirty bit. The hypervisor can then wait until the GIC is ready before actually running the vPE. Plug the detection code as well as polling on vPE schedule. While at it, tidy-up the kernel message that displays the GICv4 optional features. Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2020-04-05Merge tag 'irq-urgent-2020-04-05' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-20/+15
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull irq fixes from Thomas Gleixner: "Two reverts addressing regressions of the Xilinx interrupt controller driver which affected the PPC users" * tag 'irq-urgent-2020-04-05' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: Revert "irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler" Revert "irqchip/xilinx: Do not call irq_set_default_host()"
2020-04-01Merge tag 'irqchip-fixes-5.7-1' of ↵Thomas Gleixner1-20/+15
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms into irq/core Pull irqchip fixes from Marc Zygnier: - Partially revert Xilinx changes that break PPC systems
2020-04-01Revert "irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler"Marc Zyngier1-20/+14
This reverts commit a0789993bf8266e62fea6b4613945ba081c71e7d, which breaks a number of PPC platforms. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/44b64be7-9240-fd52-af90-e0245220f38b@xilinx.com
2020-04-01Revert "irqchip/xilinx: Do not call irq_set_default_host()"Marc Zyngier1-0/+1
This reverts commit 9c2d4f525c002591f4e0c14a37663663aaba1656, which breaks a number of PPC platforms. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/44b64be7-9240-fd52-af90-e0245220f38b@xilinx.com
2020-03-31Merge tag 'mips_5.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linuxLinus Torvalds4-0/+441
Pull MIPS updates from Thomas Bogendoerfer: - loongson64 irq rework - dmi support loongson - replace setup_irq() by request_irq() - jazz cleanups - minor cleanups and fixes * tag 'mips_5.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux: (44 commits) MIPS: ralink: mt7621: Fix soc_device introduction MIPS: Exclude more dsemul code when CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n MIPS/tlbex: Fix LDDIR usage in setup_pw() for Loongson-3 MIPS: do not compile generic functions for CONFIG_CAVIUM_OCTEON_SOC MAINTAINERS: Update Loongson64 entry MIPS: Loongson64: Load built-in dtbs MIPS: Loongson64: Add generic dts dt-bindings: mips: Add loongson boards MIPS: Loongson64: Drop legacy IRQ code dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Loongson-3 HTPIC irqchip: Add driver for Loongson-3 HyperTransport PIC controller dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Loongson LIOINTC irqchip: loongson-liointc: Workaround LPC IRQ Errata irqchip: Add driver for Loongson I/O Local Interrupt Controller docs: mips: remove no longer needed au1xxx_ide.rst documentation MIPS: Alchemy: remove no longer used au1xxx_ide.h header ide: remove no longer used au1xxx-ide driver MIPS: Add support for Desktop Management Interface (DMI) firmware: dmi: Add macro SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START MIPS: ralink: mt7621: introduce 'soc_device' initialization ...
2020-03-31Merge tag 'irq-core-2020-03-30' of ↵Linus Torvalds18-183/+835
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull irq updates from Thomas Gleixner: "Updates for the interrupt subsystem: Treewide: - Cleanup of setup_irq() which is not longer required because the memory allocator is available early. Most cleanup changes come through the various maintainer trees, so the final removal of setup_irq() is postponed towards the end of the merge window. Core: - Protection against unsafe invocation of interrupt handlers and unsafe interrupt injection including a fixup of the offending PCI/AER error injection mechanism. Invoking interrupt handlers from arbitrary contexts, i.e. outside of an actual interrupt, can cause inconsistent state on the fragile x86 interrupt affinity changing hardware trainwreck. Drivers: - Second wave of support for the new ARM GICv4.1 - Multi-instance support for Xilinx and PLIC interrupt controllers - CPU-Hotplug support for PLIC - The obligatory new driver for X1000 TCU - Enhancements, cleanups and fixes all over the place" * tag 'irq-core-2020-03-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (58 commits) unicore32: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq() sh: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq() hexagon: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq() c6x: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq() alpha: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq() irqchip/gic-v4.1: Eagerly vmap vPEs irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI property setup irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI allocation/teardown irqchip/gic-v4.1: Move doorbell management to the GICv4 abstraction layer irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb set_vcpu_affinity SGI callbacks irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state SGI callbacks irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb mask/unmask SGI callbacks irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add initial SGI configuration irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb skeletal VSGI irqchip irqchip/stm32: Retrigger both in eoi and unmask callbacks irqchip/gic-v3: Move irq_domain_update_bus_token to after checking for NULL domain irqchip/xilinx: Do not call irq_set_default_host() irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler irqchip/xilinx: Fill error code when irq domain registration fails irqchip/xilinx: Add support for multiple instances ...
2020-03-30Merge tag 'v5.6' into mips-nextThomas Bogendoerfer1-1/+29
Linux 5.6
2020-03-25irqchip: Add driver for Loongson-3 HyperTransport PIC controllerJiaxun Yang3-0/+160
This controller appeared on Loongson-3 family of chips to receive interrupts from PCH PIC. It is a I8259 with optimized interrupt polling flow. We can poll interrupt number from HT vector directly but still have to follow standard I8259 routines to mask, unmask and EOI. Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Co-developed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
2020-03-25irqchip: loongson-liointc: Workaround LPC IRQ ErrataJiaxun Yang1-2/+12
The 1.0 version of that controller has a bug that status bit of LPC IRQ sometimes doesn't get set correctly. So we can always blame LPC IRQ when spurious interrupt happens at the parent interrupt line which LPC IRQ supposed to route to. Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Co-developed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
2020-03-25irqchip: Add driver for Loongson I/O Local Interrupt ControllerJiaxun Yang3-0/+271
This controller appeared on Loongson family of chips as the primary package interrupt source. Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Co-developed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
2020-03-24Merge branch 'irq/gic-v4.1' into irq/irqchip-nextMarc Zyngier3-31/+538
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2020-03-24irqchip/gic-v4.1: Eagerly vmap vPEsMarc Zyngier1-10/+42
Now that we have HW-accelerated SGIs being delivered to VPEs, it becomes required to map the VPEs on all ITSs instead of relying on the lazy approach that we would use when using the ITS-list mechanism. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-17-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-24irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI property setupMarc Zyngier1-0/+13
Add the SGI configuration entry point for KVM to use. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-16-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-24irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI allocation/teardownMarc Zyngier1-1/+67
Allocate per-VPE SGIs when initializing the GIC-specific part of the VPE data structure. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-15-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-24irqchip/gic-v4.1: Move doorbell management to the GICv4 abstraction layerMarc Zyngier1-4/+41
In order to hide some of the differences between v4.0 and v4.1, move the doorbell management out of the KVM code, and into the GICv4-specific layer. This allows the calling code to ask for the doorbell when blocking, and otherwise to leave the doorbell permanently disabled. This matches the v4.1 code perfectly, and only results in a minor refactoring of the v4.0 code. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-14-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-24irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb set_vcpu_affinity SGI callbacksMarc Zyngier1-0/+18
Just like for vLPIs, there is some configuration information that cannot be directly communicated through the normal irqchip API, and we have to use our good old friend set_vcpu_affinity as a side-band communication mechanism. This is used to configure group and priority for a given vSGI. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-13-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-24irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state SGI callbacksMarc Zyngier1-0/+77
To implement the get/set_irqchip_state callbacks (limited to the PENDING state), we have to use a particular set of hacks: - Reading the pending state is done by using a pair of new redistributor registers (GICR_VSGIR, GICR_VSGIPENDR), which allow the 16 interrupts state to be retrieved. - Setting the pending state is done by generating it as we'd otherwise do for a guest (writing to GITS_SGIR). - Clearing the pending state is done by emitting a VSGI command with the "clear" bit set. This requires some interesting locking though: - When talking to the redistributor, we must make sure that the VPE affinity doesn't change, hence taking the VPE lock. - At the same time, we must ensure that nobody accesses the same redistributor's GICR_VSGIR registers for a different VPE, which would corrupt the reading of the pending bits. We thus take the per-RD spinlock. Much fun. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-12-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-24irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb mask/unmask SGI callbacksMarc Zyngier1-0/+18
Implement mask/unmask for virtual SGIs by calling into the configuration helper. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-11-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-24irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add initial SGI configurationMarc Zyngier1-1/+91
The GICv4.1 ITS has yet another new command (VSGI) which allows a VPE-targeted SGI to be configured (or have its pending state cleared). Add support for this command and plumb it into the activate irqdomain callback so that it is ready to be used. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-10-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-24irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb skeletal VSGI irqchipMarc Zyngier2-3/+80
Since GICv4.1 has the capability to inject 16 SGIs into each VPE, and that I'm keen not to invent too many specific interfaces to manipulate these interrupts, let's pretend that each of these SGIs is an actual Linux interrupt. For that matter, let's introduce a minimal irqchip and irqdomain setup that will get fleshed up in the following patches. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-9-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-22irqchip/gic-v3: Move irq_domain_update_bus_token to after checking for NULL ↵luanshi1-1/+2
domain irq_domain_update_bus_token should be called after checking for NULL domain. Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1583983255-44115-1-git-send-email-zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com
2020-03-22irqchip/xilinx: Do not call irq_set_default_host()Mubin Sayyed1-1/+0
Using a default domain on DT based platforms is unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Mubin Sayyed <mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317125600.15913-5-mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com
2020-03-22irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handlerMichal Simek1-14/+20
Register default arch handler via driver instead of directly pointing to xilinx intc controller. This patch makes architecture code more generic. Driver calls generic domain specific irq handler which does the most of things self. Also get rid of concurrent_irq counting which hasn't been exported anywhere. Based on this loop was also optimized by using do/while loop instead of goto loop. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@xilinx.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317125600.15913-4-mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com
2020-03-22irqchip/xilinx: Fill error code when irq domain registration failsMichal Simek1-0/+1
There is no ret filled in case of irq_domain_add_linear() failure. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@xilinx.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317125600.15913-3-mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com
2020-03-22irqchip/xilinx: Add support for multiple instancesMubin Sayyed1-48/+67
Added support for cascaded interrupt controllers. Following cascaded configurations have been tested, - peripheral->xilinx-intc->xilinx-intc->gic->Cortexa53 processor on zcu102 board - peripheral->xilinx-intc->xilinx-intc->microblaze processor on kcu105 board Signed-off-by: Mubin Sayyed <mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Anirudha Sarangi <anirudha.sarangi@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317125600.15913-2-mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com
2020-03-22irqchip/ingenic: Add support for TCU of X1000.周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)1-0/+1
Enable TCU support for Ingenic X1000, which can be supported by the existing driver. Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1584456160-40060-3-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com
2020-03-22irqchip/qcom-irq-combiner: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319214531.GA21326@embeddedor.com
2020-03-22irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319214438.GA21123@embeddedor.com
2020-03-22irqchip/versatile-fpga: Apply clear-mask earlierSungbo Eo1-3/+3
Clear its own IRQs before the parent IRQ get enabled, so that the remaining IRQs do not accidentally interrupt the parent IRQ controller. This patch also fixes a reboot bug on OX820 SoC, where the remaining rps-timer IRQ raises a GIC interrupt that is left pending. After that, the rps-timer IRQ is cleared during driver initialization, and there's no IRQ left in rps-irq when local_irq_enable() is called, which evokes an error message "unexpected IRQ trap". Fixes: bdd272cbb97a ("irqchip: versatile FPGA: support cascaded interrupts from DT") Signed-off-by: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@gorani.run> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200321133842.2408823-1-mans0n@gorani.run
2020-03-21irqchip/gic-v4: Use Inner-Shareable attributes for virtual pending tablesHeyi Guo1-1/+1
There is no special reason to set virtual LPI pending table as non-shareable. If we choose to hard code the shareability without probing, Inner-Shareable is likely to be a better choice, as the VPEs can move around and benefit from having the redistributors snooping each other's cache, if that's something they can do. Furthermore, Hisilicon hip08 ends up with unspecified errors when mixing shareability attributes. So let's move to IS attributes for the VPT. This has also been tested on D05 and didn't show any regression. Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com> [maz: rewrote commit message] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191130073849.38378-1-guoheyi@huawei.com
2020-03-20irqchip/gic-v4.1: Map the ITS SGIR register pageMarc Zyngier1-2/+13
One of the new features of GICv4.1 is to allow virtual SGIs to be directly signaled to a VPE. For that, the ITS has grown a new 64kB page containing only a single register that is used to signal a SGI to a given VPE. Add a second mapping covering this new 64kB range, and take this opportunity to limit the original mapping to 64kB, which is enough to cover the span of the ITS registers. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-8-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-20irqchip/gic-v4.1: Advertise support v4.1 to KVMMarc Zyngier2-1/+10
Tell KVM that we support v4.1. Nothing uses this information so far. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-7-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-20irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual exclusion betwen invalidations on the same RDMarc Zyngier2-0/+7
The GICv4.1 spec says that it is CONTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE to write to any of the GICR_INV{LPI,ALL}R registers if GICR_SYNCR.Busy == 1. To deal with it, we must ensure that only a single invalidation can happen at a time for a given redistributor. Add a per-RD lock to that effect and take it around the invalidation/syncr-read to deal with this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-6-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-20irqchip/gic-v4.1: Wait for completion of redistributor's INVALL operationZenghui Yu1-0/+2
In GICv4.1, we emulate a guest-issued INVALL command by a direct write to GICR_INVALLR. Before we finish the emulation and go back to guest, let's make sure the physical invalidate operation is actually completed and no stale data will be left in redistributor. Per the specification, this can be achieved by polling the GICR_SYNCR.Busy bit (to zero). Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200302092145.899-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-5-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-19irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual exclusion between vPE affinity change and RD ↵Marc Zyngier1-8/+48
access Before GICv4.1, all operations would be serialized with the affinity changes by virtue of using the same ITS command queue. With v4.1, things change, as invalidations (and a number of other operations) are issued using the redistributor MMIO frame. We must thus make sure that these redistributor accesses cannot race against aginst the affinity change, or we may end-up talking to the wrong redistributor. To ensure this, we expand the irq_to_cpuid() helper to take a spinlock when the LPI is mapped to a vLPI (a new per-VPE lock) on each operation that requires mutual exclusion. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-4-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-19irqchip/gic-v4.1: Skip absent CPUs while iterating over redistributorsMarc Zyngier1-0/+4
In a system that is only sparsly populated with CPUs, we can end-up with redistributors structures that are not initialized. Let's make sure we don't try and access those when iterating over them (in this case when checking we have a L2 VPE table). Fixes: 4e6437f12d6e ("irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure L2 vPE table is allocated at RD level") Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-3-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-19irqchip/gic-v3: Use SGIs without active state if offeredMarc Zyngier1-2/+8
To allow the direct injection of SGIs into a guest, the GICv4.1 architecture has to sacrifice the Active state so that SGIs look a lot like LPIs (they are injected by the same mechanism). In order not to break existing software, the architecture gives offers guests OSs the choice: SGIs with or without an active state. It is the hypervisors duty to honor the guest's choice. For this, the architecture offers a discovery bit indicating whether the GIC supports GICv4.1 SGIs (GICD_TYPER2.nASSGIcap), and another bit indicating whether the guest wants Active-less SGIs or not (controlled by GICD_CTLR.nASSGIreq). A hypervisor not supporting GICv4.1 SGIs would leave nASSGIcap clear, and a guest not knowing about GICv4.1 SGIs (or definitely wanting an Active state) would leave nASSGIreq clear (both being thankfully backward compatible with older revisions of the GIC). Since Linux is perfectly happy without an active state on SGIs, inform the hypervisor that we'll use that if offered. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-2-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-19irqchip/versatile-fpga: Handle chained IRQs properlySungbo Eo1-2/+10
Enclose the chained handler with chained_irq_{enter,exit}(), so that the muxed interrupts get properly acked. This patch also fixes a reboot bug on OX820 SoC, where the jiffies timer interrupt is never acked. The kernel waits a clock tick forever in calibrate_delay_converge(), which leads to a boot hang. Fixes: c41b16f8c9d9 ("ARM: integrator/versatile: consolidate FPGA IRQ handling code") Signed-off-by: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@gorani.run> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319023448.1479701-1-mans0n@gorani.run
2020-03-16irqchip/gic-v4: Provide irq_retrigger to avoid circular locking dependencyMarc Zyngier1-0/+6
On a very heavily loaded D05 with GICv4, I managed to trigger the following lockdep splat: [ 6022.598864] ====================================================== [ 6022.605031] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 6022.611200] 5.6.0-rc4-00026-geee7c7b0f498 #680 Tainted: G E [ 6022.618061] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 6022.624227] qemu-system-aar/7569 is trying to acquire lock: [ 6022.629789] ffff042f97606808 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.637102] [ 6022.637102] but task is already holding lock: [ 6022.642921] ffff002fae424cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.651350] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.659512] [ 6022.659512] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 6022.666980] [ 6022.666980] -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: [ 6022.672983] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.677848] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.682453] irq_set_vcpu_affinity+0x40/0xc0 [ 6022.687236] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0x6c/0xb8 [ 6022.692364] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.696273] vgic_v3_put+0x20/0xd8 [ 6022.700183] kvm_vgic_put+0x30/0x48 [ 6022.704182] kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.708614] kvm_sched_out+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.712700] __schedule+0x4bc/0x7f8 [ 6022.716697] schedule+0x50/0xd8 [ 6022.720347] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5f0/0x978 [ 6022.725473] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.729820] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.733642] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.738074] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.743373] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.747198] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.750761] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.755278] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.759100] [ 6022.759100] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.764143] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50 [ 6022.768314] task_fork_fair+0x40/0x128 [ 6022.772572] sched_fork+0xe0/0x210 [ 6022.776484] copy_process+0x8c4/0x18d8 [ 6022.780742] _do_fork+0x88/0x6d8 [ 6022.784478] kernel_thread+0x64/0x88 [ 6022.788563] rest_init+0x30/0x270 [ 6022.792390] arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c [ 6022.796995] start_kernel+0x498/0x4c4 [ 6022.801164] [ 6022.801164] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.806382] __lock_acquire+0xdd8/0x15c8 [ 6022.810813] lock_acquire+0xd0/0x218 [ 6022.814896] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.819761] try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.824018] wake_up_process+0x1c/0x28 [ 6022.828276] wakeup_softirqd+0x38/0x40 [ 6022.832533] __tasklet_schedule_common+0xc4/0xf0 [ 6022.837658] __tasklet_schedule+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.842176] check_irq_resend+0xc8/0x158 [ 6022.846609] irq_startup+0x74/0x128 [ 6022.850606] __enable_irq+0x6c/0x78 [ 6022.854602] enable_irq+0x54/0xa0 [ 6022.858431] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0xa4/0xb8 [ 6022.863557] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.867469] kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking+0x28/0x38 [ 6022.872336] kvm_vcpu_block+0x48/0x490 [ 6022.876594] kvm_handle_wfx+0x18c/0x310 [ 6022.880938] handle_exit+0x138/0x198 [ 6022.885022] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x978 [ 6022.890148] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.894494] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.898317] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.902748] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.908046] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.911871] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.915434] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.919951] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.923773] other info that might help us debug this: [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.931762] Chain exists of: [ 6022.931762] &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> &irq_desc_lock_class [ 6022.931762] [ 6022.942101] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 6022.942101] [ 6022.948007] CPU0 CPU1 [ 6022.952523] ---- ---- [ 6022.957039] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.961036] lock(&rq->lock); [ 6022.966595] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.973109] lock(&p->pi_lock); [ 6022.976324] [ 6022.976324] *** DEADLOCK *** This is happening because we have a pending doorbell that requires retrigger. As SW retriggering is done in a tasklet, we trigger the circular dependency above. The easy cop-out is to provide a retrigger callback that doesn't require acquiring any extra lock. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-5-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-16irqchip/atmel-aic5: Fix irq_retrigger callback return valueMarc Zyngier1-1/+1
The irq_retrigger callback is supposed to return 0 when retrigger has failed, and a non-zero value otherwise. Tell the core code that the driver has succedded in using the HW to retrigger the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-3-maz@kernel.org
2020-03-16irqchip/atmel-aic: Fix irq_retrigger callback return valueMarc Zyngier1-1/+1
The irq_retrigger callback is supposed to return 0 when retrigger has failed, and a non-zero value otherwise. Tell the core code that the driver has succedded in using the HW to retrigger the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-2-maz@kernel.org
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2024-11-15 14:39:15 +0300