| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We are incorrectly limiting the max allocation size as per the mm
max_order, which is effectively the largest power-of-two that we can fit
in the region size. However, it's normal to setup the region or
allocator with a non-power-of-two size(for example 3G), which we should
already handle correctly, except it seems for the early too-big-check.
v2: make sure we also exercise the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS path, which
is quite different, since for that we are actually limited by the
largest power-of-two that we can fit within the region size. (Chris)
Fixes: b908be543e44 ("drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021103606.241395-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 83ebef47f8ebe320d5c5673db82f9903a4f40a69)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Name the object classes and their offspring for easier lockdep
debugging.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200529183204.16850-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Separate each object class into a separate lock type to avoid lockdep
cross-contamination between paths (i.e. userptr!).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191022144501.26486-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Some kernel internal objects may need to be allocated as a contiguous
block, also thinking ahead the various kernel io_mapping interfaces seem
to expect it, although this is purely a limitation in the kernel
API...so perhaps something to be improved.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
|
Support memory regions, as defined by a given (start, end), and allow
creating GEM objects which are backed by said region. The immediate goal
here is to have something to represent our device memory, but later on
we also want to represent every memory domain with a region, so stolen,
shmem, and of course device. At some point we are probably going to want
use a common struct here, such that we are better aligned with say TTM.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
