| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Clean up the SPDX licence declarations to comply with checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122192913.4518-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Currently we clear and disable the RPS pm interrupts on module load, and
presume that they remain disabled forevermore. However, the mask is
cleared on suspend and so after resume they may start showing up again
unexepectedly.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1811
Fixes: 8e99299a04bc ("drm/i915/gt: Track use of RPS interrupts in flags")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200502173512.32353-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
As with the realisation for soft-rc6, we respond to idling the engines
within microseconds, far faster than the response times for HW RC6 and
RPS. Furthermore, our fast parking upon idle, prevents HW RPS from
running for many desktop workloads, as the RPS evaluation intervals are
on the order of tens of milliseconds, but the typical workload is just a
couple of milliseconds, but yet we still need to determine the best
frequency for user latency versus power.
Recognising that the HW evaluation intervals are a poor fit, and that
they were deprecated [in bspec at least] from gen10, start to wean
ourselves off them and replace the EI with a timer and our accurate
busy-stats. The principle benefit of manually evaluating RPS intervals
is that we can be more responsive for better performance and powersaving
for both spiky workloads and steady-state.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1698
Fixes: 98479ada421a ("drm/i915/gt: Treat idling as a RPS downclock event")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200429205446.3259-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Use the new intel_rps.flags field to store whether or not interrupts are
being used with RPS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200429205446.3259-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Pull the boolean intel_rps.enabled and intel_rps.active into a single
flags field, in preparation for more.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200429205446.3259-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Add two helpers that for reading the actual GT's frequency. The
two helpers are:
- intel_rps_read_cagf: reads the frequency and returns it not
normalized
- intel_rps_read_actual_frequency: provides the frequency in Hz.
Use the above helpers in sysfs and debugfs.
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213183736.31992-2-andi@etezian.org
|
|
During startup, we may find ourselves in an interesting position where
we haven't fully enabled RPS before the display starts trying to use it.
This may lead to an imbalance in our "interactive" counter:
<3>[ 4.813326] intel_rps_mark_interactive:652 GEM_BUG_ON(!rps->power.interactive)
<4>[ 4.813396] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<2>[ 4.813398] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c:652!
<4>[ 4.813430] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
<4>[ 4.813438] CPU: 1 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/1:0H Not tainted 5.4.0-rc5-CI-CI_DRM_7209+ #1
<4>[ 4.813447] Hardware name: /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017
<4>[ 4.813525] Workqueue: events_highpri intel_atomic_cleanup_work [i915]
<4>[ 4.813589] RIP: 0010:intel_rps_mark_interactive+0xb3/0xc0 [i915]
<4>[ 4.813597] Code: bc 3f de e0 48 8b 35 84 2e 24 00 49 c7 c0 f3 d4 4e a0 b9 8c 02 00 00 48 c7 c2 80 9c 48 a0 48 c7 c7 3e 73 34 a0 e8 8d 3b e5 e0 <0f> 0b 90 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 80 bf c0 00 00 00 00 74 32
<4>[ 4.813616] RSP: 0018:ffffc900000efe00 EFLAGS: 00010286
<4>[ 4.813623] RAX: 000000000000000e RBX: ffff8882583cc7f0 RCX: 0000000000000000
<4>[ 4.813631] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff888275969c00
<4>[ 4.813639] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000008 R09: ffff888275ace000
<4>[ 4.813646] R10: ffffc900000efe00 R11: ffff888275969c00 R12: ffff8882583cc8d8
<4>[ 4.813654] R13: ffff888276abce00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88825e878860
<4>[ 4.813662] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888276a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4>[ 4.813672] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4>[ 4.813678] CR2: 00007f051d5ca0a8 CR3: 0000000262f48001 CR4: 00000000003606e0
<4>[ 4.813686] Call Trace:
<4>[ 4.813755] intel_cleanup_plane_fb+0x4e/0x60 [i915]
<4>[ 4.813764] drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes+0x4d/0x70
<4>[ 4.813833] intel_atomic_cleanup_work+0x15/0x80 [i915]
<4>[ 4.813842] process_one_work+0x26a/0x620
<4>[ 4.813850] worker_thread+0x37/0x380
<4>[ 4.813857] ? process_one_work+0x620/0x620
<4>[ 4.813864] kthread+0x119/0x130
<4>[ 4.813870] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
<4>[ 4.813878] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
<4>[ 4.813887] Modules linked in: i915(+) mei_hdcp x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul btusb btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_intel snd_intel_nhlt snd_hda_codec bluetooth snd_hwdep snd_hda_core ghash_clmulni_intel snd_pcm e1000e ecdh_generic ecc ptp pps_core mei_me mei prime_numbers
<4>[ 4.813934] ---[ end trace c13289af88174ffc ]---
The solution employed is to not worry about RPS state and keep the tally
of the interactive counter separate. When we do enable RPS, we will then
take the display activity into account.
Fixes: 3e7abf814193 ("drm/i915: Extract GT render power state management")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191030103827.2413-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
i915_irq.c is large. One reason for this is that has a large chunk of
the GT render power management stashed away in it. Extract that logic
out of i915_irq.c and intel_pm.c and put it under one roof.
Based on a patch by Chris Wilson.
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191024211642.7688-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
