summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kvm/svm
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-02-04KVM/SVM: add support for SEV attestation commandBrijesh Singh1-0/+71
The SEV FW version >= 0.23 added a new command that can be used to query the attestation report containing the SHA-256 digest of the guest memory encrypted through the KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_{DATA, VMSA} commands and sign the report with the Platform Endorsement Key (PEK). See the SEV FW API spec section 6.8 for more details. Note there already exist a command (KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_MEASURE) that can be used to get the SHA-256 digest. The main difference between the KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_MEASURE and KVM_SEV_ATTESTATION_REPORT is that the latter can be called while the guest is running and the measurement value is signed with PEK. Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Tested-by: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com> Message-Id: <20210104151749.30248-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-02-03KVM: x86: cleanup CR3 reserved bits checksPaolo Bonzini2-13/+3
If not in long mode, the low bits of CR3 are reserved but not enforced to be zero, so remove those checks. If in long mode, however, the MBZ bits extend down to the highest physical address bit of the guest, excluding the encryption bit. Make the checks consistent with the above, and match them between nested_vmcb_checks and KVM_SET_SREGS. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 761e41693465 ("KVM: nSVM: Check that MBZ bits in CR3 and CR4 are not set on vmrun of nested guests") Fixes: a780a3ea6282 ("KVM: X86: Fix reserved bits check for MOV to CR3") Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-02-03KVM: SVM: Treat SVM as unsupported when running as an SEV guestSean Christopherson1-0/+5
Don't let KVM load when running as an SEV guest, regardless of what CPUID says. Memory is encrypted with a key that is not accessible to the host (L0), thus it's impossible for L0 to emulate SVM, e.g. it'll see garbage when reading the VMCB. Technically, KVM could decrypt all memory that needs to be accessible to the L0 and use shadow paging so that L0 does not need to shadow NPT, but exposing such information to L0 largely defeats the purpose of running as an SEV guest. This can always be revisited if someone comes up with a use case for running VMs inside SEV guests. Note, VMLOAD, VMRUN, etc... will also #GP on GPAs with C-bit set, i.e. KVM is doomed even if the SEV guest is debuggable and the hypervisor is willing to decrypt the VMCB. This may or may not be fixed on CPUs that have the SVME_ADDR_CHK fix. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20210202212017.2486595-1-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-28Fix unsynchronized access to sev members through svm_register_enc_regionPeter Gonda1-7/+10
Grab kvm->lock before pinning memory when registering an encrypted region; sev_pin_memory() relies on kvm->lock being held to ensure correctness when checking and updating the number of pinned pages. Add a lockdep assertion to help prevent future regressions. Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 1e80fdc09d12 ("KVM: SVM: Pin guest memory when SEV is active") Signed-off-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com> V2 - Fix up patch description - Correct file paths svm.c -> sev.c - Add unlock of kvm->lock on sev_pin_memory error V1 - https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20210126185431.1824530-1-pgonda@google.com/ Message-Id: <20210127161524.2832400-1-pgonda@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-26KVM: x86: allow KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES outside guest mode for VMXPaolo Bonzini1-0/+3
VMX also uses KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES for the Hyper-V eVMCS, which may need to be loaded outside guest mode. Therefore we cannot WARN in that case. However, that part of nested_get_vmcs12_pages is _not_ needed at vmentry time. Split it out of KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES handling, so that both vmentry and migration (and in the latter case, independent of is_guest_mode) do the parts that are needed. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10.x: f2c7ef3ba: KVM: nSVM: cancel KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10.x Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-26KVM: SVM: Unconditionally sync GPRs to GHCB on VMRUN of SEV-ES guestSean Christopherson1-9/+6
Drop the per-GPR dirty checks when synchronizing GPRs to the GHCB, the GRPs' dirty bits are set from time zero and never cleared, i.e. will always be seen as dirty. The obvious alternative would be to clear the dirty bits when appropriate, but removing the dirty checks is desirable as it allows reverting GPR dirty+available tracking, which adds overhead to all flavors of x86 VMs. Note, unconditionally writing the GPRs in the GHCB is tacitly allowed by the GHCB spec, which allows the hypervisor (or guest) to provide unnecessary info; it's the guest's responsibility to consume only what it needs (the hypervisor is untrusted after all). The guest and hypervisor can supply additional state if desired but must not rely on that additional state being provided. Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Fixes: 291bd20d5d88 ("KVM: SVM: Add initial support for a VMGEXIT VMEXIT") Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20210122235049.3107620-2-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-26kvm: tracing: Fix unmatched kvm_entry and kvm_exit eventsLorenzo Brescia1-0/+2
On VMX, if we exit and then re-enter immediately without leaving the vmx_vcpu_run() function, the kvm_entry event is not logged. That means we will see one (or more) kvm_exit, without its (their) corresponding kvm_entry, as shown here: CPU-1979 [002] 89.871187: kvm_entry: vcpu 1 CPU-1979 [002] 89.871218: kvm_exit: reason MSR_WRITE CPU-1979 [002] 89.871259: kvm_exit: reason MSR_WRITE It also seems possible for a kvm_entry event to be logged, but then we leave vmx_vcpu_run() right away (if vmx->emulation_required is true). In this case, we will have a spurious kvm_entry event in the trace. Fix these situations by moving trace_kvm_entry() inside vmx_vcpu_run() (where trace_kvm_exit() already is). A trace obtained with this patch applied looks like this: CPU-14295 [000] 8388.395387: kvm_entry: vcpu 0 CPU-14295 [000] 8388.395392: kvm_exit: reason MSR_WRITE CPU-14295 [000] 8388.395393: kvm_entry: vcpu 0 CPU-14295 [000] 8388.395503: kvm_exit: reason EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT Of course, not calling trace_kvm_entry() in common x86 code any longer means that we need to adjust the SVM side of things too. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Brescia <lorenzo.brescia@edu.unito.it> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com> Message-Id: <160873470698.11652.13483635328769030605.stgit@Wayrath> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-08KVM: SVM: Add support for booting APs in an SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky3-0/+34
Typically under KVM, an AP is booted using the INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence, where the guest vCPU register state is updated and then the vCPU is VMRUN to begin execution of the AP. For an SEV-ES guest, this won't work because the guest register state is encrypted. Following the GHCB specification, the hypervisor must not alter the guest register state, so KVM must track an AP/vCPU boot. Should the guest want to park the AP, it must use the AP Reset Hold exit event in place of, for example, a HLT loop. First AP boot (first INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence): Execute the AP (vCPU) as it was initialized and measured by the SEV-ES support. It is up to the guest to transfer control of the AP to the proper location. Subsequent AP boot: KVM will expect to receive an AP Reset Hold exit event indicating that the vCPU is being parked and will require an INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence to awaken it. When the AP Reset Hold exit event is received, KVM will place the vCPU into a simulated HLT mode. Upon receiving the INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence, KVM will make the vCPU runnable. It is again up to the guest to then transfer control of the AP to the proper location. To differentiate between an actual HLT and an AP Reset Hold, a new MP state is introduced, KVM_MP_STATE_AP_RESET_HOLD, which the vCPU is placed in upon receiving the AP Reset Hold exit event. Additionally, to communicate the AP Reset Hold exit event up to userspace (if needed), a new exit reason is introduced, KVM_EXIT_AP_RESET_HOLD. A new x86 ops function is introduced, vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector, in order to accomplish AP booting. For VMX, vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector is set to the original SIPI delivery function, kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(). SVM adds a new function that, for non SEV-ES guests, invokes the original SIPI delivery function, kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(), but for SEV-ES guests, implements the logic above. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <e8fbebe8eb161ceaabdad7c01a5859a78b424d5e.1609791600.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-08KVM: nSVM: cancel KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES on nested vmexitMaxim Levitsky1-0/+3
It is possible to exit the nested guest mode, entered by svm_set_nested_state prior to first vm entry to it (e.g due to pending event) if the nested run was not pending during the migration. In this case we must not switch to the nested msr permission bitmap. Also add a warning to catch similar cases in the future. Fixes: a7d5c7ce41ac1 ("KVM: nSVM: delay MSR permission processing to first nested VM run") Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20210107093854.882483-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-08KVM: nSVM: mark vmcb as dirty when forcingly leaving the guest modeMaxim Levitsky1-0/+1
We overwrite most of vmcb fields while doing so, so we must mark it as dirty. Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20210107093854.882483-5-mlevitsk@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-08KVM: nSVM: correctly restore nested_run_pending on migrationMaxim Levitsky1-0/+4
The code to store it on the migration exists, but no code was restoring it. One of the side effects of fixing this is that L1->L2 injected events are no longer lost when migration happens with nested run pending. Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20210107093854.882483-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-08KVM/SVM: Remove leftover __svm_vcpu_run prototype from svm.cUros Bizjak1-2/+0
Commit 16809ecdc1e8a moved __svm_vcpu_run the prototype to svm.h, but forgot to remove the original from svm.c. Fixes: 16809ecdc1e8a ("KVM: SVM: Provide an updated VMRUN invocation for SEV-ES guests") Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20201220200339.65115-1-ubizjak@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-08KVM: SVM: Add register operand to vmsave call in sev_es_vcpu_loadNathan Chancellor1-1/+1
When using LLVM's integrated assembler (LLVM_IAS=1) while building x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_KVM=y + CONFIG_KVM_AMD=y, the following build error occurs: $ make LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.o arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c:2004:15: error: too few operands for instruction asm volatile(__ex("vmsave") : : "a" (__sme_page_pa(sd->save_area)) : "memory"); ^ arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c:28:17: note: expanded from macro '__ex' #define __ex(x) __kvm_handle_fault_on_reboot(x) ^ ./arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h:1646:10: note: expanded from macro '__kvm_handle_fault_on_reboot' "666: \n\t" \ ^ <inline asm>:2:2: note: instantiated into assembly here vmsave ^ 1 error generated. This happens because LLVM currently does not support calling vmsave without the fixed register operand (%rax for 64-bit and %eax for 32-bit). This will be fixed in LLVM 12 but the kernel currently supports LLVM 10.0.1 and newer so this needs to be handled. Add the proper register using the _ASM_AX macro, which matches the vmsave call in vmenter.S. Fixes: 861377730aa9 ("KVM: SVM: Provide support for SEV-ES vCPU loading") Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93524 Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1216 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20201219063711.3526947-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-01-08Merge branch 'kvm-master' into kvm-nextPaolo Bonzini2-4/+6
Fixes to get_mmio_spte, destined to 5.10 stable branch.
2020-12-16KVM: SVM: fix 32-bit compilationPaolo Bonzini1-0/+2
VCPU_REGS_R8...VCPU_REGS_R15 are not defined on 32-bit x86, so cull them from the synchronization of the VMSA. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add AP_JUMP_TABLE support in prep for AP bootingTom Lendacky2-0/+29
The GHCB specification requires the hypervisor to save the address of an AP Jump Table so that, for example, vCPUs that have been parked by UEFI can be started by the OS. Provide support for the AP Jump Table set/get exit code. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Provide support to launch and run an SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky1-0/+104
An SEV-ES guest is started by invoking a new SEV initialization ioctl, KVM_SEV_ES_INIT. This identifies the guest as an SEV-ES guest, which is used to drive the appropriate ASID allocation, VMSA encryption, etc. Before being able to run an SEV-ES vCPU, the vCPU VMSA must be encrypted and measured. This is done using the LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA command after all calls to LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA have been performed, but before LAUNCH_MEASURE has been performed. In order to establish the encrypted VMSA, the current (traditional) VMSA and the GPRs are synced to the page that will hold the encrypted VMSA and then LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA is invoked. The vCPU is then marked as having protected guest state. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <e9643245adb809caf3a87c09997926d2f3d6ff41.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Provide an updated VMRUN invocation for SEV-ES guestsTom Lendacky3-9/+71
The run sequence is different for an SEV-ES guest compared to a legacy or even an SEV guest. The guest vCPU register state of an SEV-ES guest will be restored on VMRUN and saved on VMEXIT. There is no need to restore the guest registers directly and through VMLOAD before VMRUN and no need to save the guest registers directly and through VMSAVE on VMEXIT. Update the svm_vcpu_run() function to skip register state saving and restoring and provide an alternative function for running an SEV-ES guest in vmenter.S Additionally, certain host state is restored across an SEV-ES VMRUN. As a result certain register states are not required to be restored upon VMEXIT (e.g. FS, GS, etc.), so only do that if the guest is not an SEV-ES guest. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <fb1c66d32f2194e171b95fc1a8affd6d326e10c1.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Provide support for SEV-ES vCPU loadingTom Lendacky3-19/+93
An SEV-ES vCPU requires additional VMCB vCPU load/put requirements. SEV-ES hardware will restore certain registers on VMEXIT, but not save them on VMRUN (see Table B-3 and Table B-4 of the AMD64 APM Volume 2), so make the following changes: General vCPU load changes: - During vCPU loading, perform a VMSAVE to the per-CPU SVM save area and save the current values of XCR0, XSS and PKRU to the per-CPU SVM save area as these registers will be restored on VMEXIT. General vCPU put changes: - Do not attempt to restore registers that SEV-ES hardware has already restored on VMEXIT. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <019390e9cb5e93cd73014fa5a040c17d42588733.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Provide support for SEV-ES vCPU creation/loadingTom Lendacky3-4/+78
An SEV-ES vCPU requires additional VMCB initialization requirements for vCPU creation and vCPU load/put requirements. This includes: General VMCB initialization changes: - Set a VMCB control bit to enable SEV-ES support on the vCPU. - Set the VMCB encrypted VM save area address. - CRx registers are part of the encrypted register state and cannot be updated. Remove the CRx register read and write intercepts and replace them with CRx register write traps to track the CRx register values. - Certain MSR values are part of the encrypted register state and cannot be updated. Remove certain MSR intercepts (EFER, CR_PAT, etc.). - Remove the #GP intercept (no support for "enable_vmware_backdoor"). - Remove the XSETBV intercept since the hypervisor cannot modify XCR0. General vCPU creation changes: - Set the initial GHCB gpa value as per the GHCB specification. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <3a8aef366416eddd5556dfa3fdc212aafa1ad0a2.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Update ASID allocation to support SEV-ES guestsTom Lendacky1-11/+14
SEV and SEV-ES guests each have dedicated ASID ranges. Update the ASID allocation routine to return an ASID in the respective range. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <d7aed505e31e3954268b2015bb60a1486269c780.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Set the encryption mask for the SVM host save areaTom Lendacky3-2/+4
The SVM host save area is used to restore some host state on VMEXIT of an SEV-ES guest. After allocating the save area, clear it and add the encryption mask to the SVM host save area physical address that is programmed into the VM_HSAVE_PA MSR. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <b77aa28af6d7f1a0cb545959e08d6dc75e0c3cba.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add NMI support for an SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky2-7/+17
The GHCB specification defines how NMIs are to be handled for an SEV-ES guest. To detect the completion of an NMI the hypervisor must not intercept the IRET instruction (because a #VC while running the NMI will issue an IRET) and, instead, must receive an NMI Complete exit event from the guest. Update the KVM support for detecting the completion of NMIs in the guest to follow the GHCB specification. When an SEV-ES guest is active, the IRET instruction will no longer be intercepted. Now, when the NMI Complete exit event is received, the iret_interception() function will be called to simulate the completion of the NMI. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <5ea3dd69b8d4396cefdc9048ebc1ab7caa70a847.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Guest FPU state save/restore not needed for SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky1-0/+8
The guest FPU state is automatically restored on VMRUN and saved on VMEXIT by the hardware, so there is no reason to do this in KVM. Eliminate the allocation of the guest_fpu save area and key off that to skip operations related to the guest FPU state. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <173e429b4d0d962c6a443c4553ffdaf31b7665a4.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Do not report support for SMM for an SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky1-1/+10
SEV-ES guests do not currently support SMM. Update the has_emulated_msr() kvm_x86_ops function to take a struct kvm parameter so that the capability can be reported at a VM level. Since this op is also called during KVM initialization and before a struct kvm instance is available, comments will be added to each implementation of has_emulated_msr() to indicate the kvm parameter can be null. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <75de5138e33b945d2fb17f81ae507bda381808e3.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add support for CR8 write traps for an SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky1-1/+6
For SEV-ES guests, the interception of control register write access is not recommended. Control register interception occurs prior to the control register being modified and the hypervisor is unable to modify the control register itself because the register is located in the encrypted register state. SEV-ES guests introduce new control register write traps. These traps provide intercept support of a control register write after the control register has been modified. The new control register value is provided in the VMCB EXITINFO1 field, allowing the hypervisor to track the setting of the guest control registers. Add support to track the value of the guest CR8 register using the control register write trap so that the hypervisor understands the guest operating mode. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <5a01033f4c8b3106ca9374b7cadf8e33da852df1.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add support for CR4 write traps for an SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky1-0/+7
For SEV-ES guests, the interception of control register write access is not recommended. Control register interception occurs prior to the control register being modified and the hypervisor is unable to modify the control register itself because the register is located in the encrypted register state. SEV-ES guests introduce new control register write traps. These traps provide intercept support of a control register write after the control register has been modified. The new control register value is provided in the VMCB EXITINFO1 field, allowing the hypervisor to track the setting of the guest control registers. Add support to track the value of the guest CR4 register using the control register write trap so that the hypervisor understands the guest operating mode. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <c3880bf2db8693aa26f648528fbc6e967ab46e25.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add support for CR0 write traps for an SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky1-0/+26
For SEV-ES guests, the interception of control register write access is not recommended. Control register interception occurs prior to the control register being modified and the hypervisor is unable to modify the control register itself because the register is located in the encrypted register state. SEV-ES support introduces new control register write traps. These traps provide intercept support of a control register write after the control register has been modified. The new control register value is provided in the VMCB EXITINFO1 field, allowing the hypervisor to track the setting of the guest control registers. Add support to track the value of the guest CR0 register using the control register write trap so that the hypervisor understands the guest operating mode. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <182c9baf99df7e40ad9617ff90b84542705ef0d7.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add support for EFER write traps for an SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky1-0/+20
For SEV-ES guests, the interception of EFER write access is not recommended. EFER interception occurs prior to EFER being modified and the hypervisor is unable to modify EFER itself because the register is located in the encrypted register state. SEV-ES support introduces a new EFER write trap. This trap provides intercept support of an EFER write after it has been modified. The new EFER value is provided in the VMCB EXITINFO1 field, allowing the hypervisor to track the setting of the guest EFER. Add support to track the value of the guest EFER value using the EFER write trap so that the hypervisor understands the guest operating mode. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <8993149352a3a87cd0625b3b61bfd31ab28977e1.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Support string IO operations for an SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky3-5/+25
For an SEV-ES guest, string-based port IO is performed to a shared (un-encrypted) page so that both the hypervisor and guest can read or write to it and each see the contents. For string-based port IO operations, invoke SEV-ES specific routines that can complete the operation using common KVM port IO support. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <9d61daf0ffda496703717218f415cdc8fd487100.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Support MMIO for an SEV-ES guestTom Lendacky2-0/+130
For an SEV-ES guest, MMIO is performed to a shared (un-encrypted) page so that both the hypervisor and guest can read or write to it and each see the contents. The GHCB specification provides software-defined VMGEXIT exit codes to indicate a request for an MMIO read or an MMIO write. Add support to recognize the MMIO requests and invoke SEV-ES specific routines that can complete the MMIO operation. These routines use common KVM support to complete the MMIO operation. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <af8de55127d5bcc3253d9b6084a0144c12307d4d.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Create trace events for VMGEXIT MSR protocol processingTom Lendacky1-0/+6
Add trace events for entry to and exit from VMGEXIT MSR protocol processing. The vCPU will be common for the trace events. The MSR protocol processing is guided by the GHCB GPA in the VMCB, so the GHCB GPA will represent the input and output values for the entry and exit events, respectively. Additionally, the exit event will contain the return code for the event. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <c5b3b440c3e0db43ff2fc02813faa94fa54896b0.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Create trace events for VMGEXIT processingTom Lendacky1-0/+6
Add trace events for entry to and exit from VMGEXIT processing. The vCPU id and the exit reason will be common for the trace events. The exit info fields will represent the input and output values for the entry and exit events, respectively. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <25357dca49a38372e8f483753fb0c1c2a70a6898.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x100Tom Lendacky2-0/+19
The GHCB specification defines a GHCB MSR protocol using the lower 12-bits of the GHCB MSR (in the hypervisor this corresponds to the GHCB GPA field in the VMCB). Function 0x100 is a request for termination of the guest. The guest has encountered some situation for which it has requested to be terminated. The GHCB MSR value contains the reason for the request. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <f3a1f7850c75b6ea4101e15bbb4a3af1a203f1dc.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x004Tom Lendacky2-2/+63
The GHCB specification defines a GHCB MSR protocol using the lower 12-bits of the GHCB MSR (in the hypervisor this corresponds to the GHCB GPA field in the VMCB). Function 0x004 is a request for CPUID information. Only a single CPUID result register can be sent per invocation, so the protocol defines the register that is requested. The GHCB MSR value is set to the CPUID register value as per the specification via the VMCB GHCB GPA field. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <fd7ee347d3936e484c06e9001e340bf6387092cd.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x002Tom Lendacky2-1/+42
The GHCB specification defines a GHCB MSR protocol using the lower 12-bits of the GHCB MSR (in the hypervisor this corresponds to the GHCB GPA field in the VMCB). Function 0x002 is a request to set the GHCB MSR value to the SEV INFO as per the specification via the VMCB GHCB GPA field. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <c23c163a505290a0d1b9efc4659b838c8c902cbc.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add initial support for a VMGEXIT VMEXITTom Lendacky3-2/+284
SEV-ES adds a new VMEXIT reason code, VMGEXIT. Initial support for a VMGEXIT includes mapping the GHCB based on the guest GPA, which is obtained from a new VMCB field, and then validating the required inputs for the VMGEXIT exit reason. Since many of the VMGEXIT exit reasons correspond to existing VMEXIT reasons, the information from the GHCB is copied into the VMCB control exit code areas and KVM register areas. The standard exit handlers are invoked, similar to standard VMEXIT processing. Before restarting the vCPU, the GHCB is updated with any registers that have been updated by the hypervisor. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <c6a4ed4294a369bd75c44d03bd7ce0f0c3840e50.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Prepare for SEV-ES exit handling in the sev.c fileTom Lendacky1-26/+38
This is a pre-patch to consolidate some exit handling code into callable functions. Follow-on patches for SEV-ES exit handling will then be able to use them from the sev.c file. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <5b8b0ffca8137f3e1e257f83df9f5c881c8a96a3.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Cannot re-initialize the VMCB after shutdown with SEV-ESTom Lendacky1-0/+7
When a SHUTDOWN VMEXIT is encountered, normally the VMCB is re-initialized so that the guest can be re-launched. But when a guest is running as an SEV-ES guest, the VMSA cannot be re-initialized because it has been encrypted. For now, just return -EINVAL to prevent a possible attempt at a guest reset. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <aa6506000f6f3a574de8dbcdab0707df844cb00c.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Do not allow instruction emulation under SEV-ESTom Lendacky1-0/+6
When a guest is running as an SEV-ES guest, it is not possible to emulate instructions. Add support to prevent instruction emulation. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <f6355ea3024fda0a3eb5eb99c6b62dca10d792bd.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Prevent debugging under SEV-ESTom Lendacky2-14/+32
Since the guest register state of an SEV-ES guest is encrypted, debugging is not supported. Update the code to prevent guest debugging when the guest has protected state. Additionally, an SEV-ES guest must only and always intercept DR7 reads and writes. Update set_dr_intercepts() and clr_dr_intercepts() to account for this. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <8db966fa2f9803d6454ce773863025d0e2e7f3cc.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: SVM: Add required changes to support intercepts under SEV-ESTom Lendacky1-10/+73
When a guest is running under SEV-ES, the hypervisor cannot access the guest register state. There are numerous places in the KVM code where certain registers are accessed that are not allowed to be accessed (e.g. RIP, CR0, etc). Add checks to prevent register accesses and add intercept update support at various points within the KVM code. Also, when handling a VMGEXIT, exceptions are passed back through the GHCB. Since the RDMSR/WRMSR intercepts (may) inject a #GP on error, update the SVM intercepts to handle this for SEV-ES guests. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> [Redo MSR part using the .complete_emulated_msr callback. - Paolo] Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-15KVM: x86: introduce complete_emulated_msr callbackPaolo Bonzini1-0/+1
This will be used by SEV-ES to inject MSR failure via the GHCB. Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-14KVM: SVM: Add support for the SEV-ES VMSATom Lendacky3-2/+94
Allocate a page during vCPU creation to be used as the encrypted VM save area (VMSA) for the SEV-ES guest. Provide a flag in the kvm_vcpu_arch structure that indicates whether the guest state is protected. When freeing a VMSA page that has been encrypted, the cache contents must be flushed using the MSR_AMD64_VM_PAGE_FLUSH before freeing the page. [ i386 build warnings ] Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <fde272b17eec804f3b9db18c131262fe074015c5.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-14KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES capability in KVMTom Lendacky3-31/+75
Add support to KVM for determining if a system is capable of supporting SEV-ES as well as determining if a guest is an SEV-ES guest. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <e66792323982c822350e40c7a1cf67ea2978a70b.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-14KVM: SVM: Remove the call to sev_platform_status() during setupTom Lendacky1-21/+1
When both KVM support and the CCP driver are built into the kernel instead of as modules, KVM initialization can happen before CCP initialization. As a result, sev_platform_status() will return a failure when it is called from sev_hardware_setup(), when this isn't really an error condition. Since sev_platform_status() doesn't need to be called at this time anyway, remove the invocation from sev_hardware_setup(). Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <618380488358b56af558f2682203786f09a49483.1607620209.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-14KVM/VMX/SVM: Move kvm_machine_check function to x86.hUros Bizjak1-20/+0
Move kvm_machine_check to x86.h to avoid two exact copies of the same function in kvm.c and svm.c. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20201029135600.122392-1-ubizjak@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-12KVM: x86: reinstate vendor-agnostic check on SPEC_CTRL cpuid bitsPaolo Bonzini1-10/+4
Until commit e7c587da1252 ("x86/speculation: Use synthetic bits for IBRS/IBPB/STIBP"), KVM was testing both Intel and AMD CPUID bits before allowing the guest to write MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL and MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD. Testing only Intel bits on VMX processors, or only AMD bits on SVM processors, fails if the guests are created with the "opposite" vendor as the host. While at it, also tweak the host CPU check to use the vendor-agnostic feature bit X86_FEATURE_IBPB, since we only care about the availability of the MSR on the host here and not about specific CPUID bits. Fixes: e7c587da1252 ("x86/speculation: Use synthetic bits for IBRS/IBPB/STIBP") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-04kvm: svm: de-allocate svm_cpu_data for all cpus in svm_cpu_uninit()Jacob Xu1-2/+2
The cpu arg for svm_cpu_uninit() was previously ignored resulting in the per cpu structure svm_cpu_data not being de-allocated for all cpus. Signed-off-by: Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com> Message-Id: <20201203205939.1783969-1-jacobhxu@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2020-12-03KVM: x86: adjust SEV for commit 7e8e6eed75ePaolo Bonzini1-1/+1
Since the ASID is now stored in svm->asid, pre_sev_run should also place it there and not directly in the VMCB control area. Reported-by: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.0) at 2025-10-01 12:26:49 +0300