| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The SBI v1.0 specificaiton is functionally same as SBI v0.3
specification except that SBI v1.0 specification went through
the full RISC-V International ratification process.
Let us change the SBI specification version to v1.0.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
|
Sparse complains about missing statics in the declarations of several
variables:
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c:38:37: warning: symbol 'vcpu_sbi_ext_time' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c:73:37: warning: symbol 'vcpu_sbi_ext_ipi' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c:126:37: warning: symbol 'vcpu_sbi_ext_rfence' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c:170:37: warning: symbol 'vcpu_sbi_ext_srst' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_base.c:69:37: warning: symbol 'vcpu_sbi_ext_base' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_base.c:90:37: warning: symbol 'vcpu_sbi_ext_experimental' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_base.c:96:37: warning: symbol 'vcpu_sbi_ext_vendor' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_hsm.c:115:37: warning: symbol 'vcpu_sbi_ext_hsm' was not declared. Should it be static?
These variables are however used in vcpu_sbi.c where they are declared
as extern. Move them to kvm_vcpu_sbi.h which is handily already
included by the three other files.
Fixes: a046c2d8578c ("RISC-V: KVM: Reorganize SBI code by moving SBI v0.1 to its own file")
Fixes: 5f862df5585c ("RISC-V: KVM: Add v0.1 replacement SBI extensions defined in v0.2")
Fixes: 3e1d86569c21 ("RISC-V: KVM: Add SBI HSM extension in KVM")
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
|
We rename kvm_sbi_system_shutdown() to kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_system_reset()
and move it to vcpu_sbi.c so that it can be shared by SBI v0.1 shutdown
and SBI v0.3 SRST extension.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
|
We upgrade SBI spec version implemented by KVM RISC-V to v0.3 so
that Guest kernel can probe and use SBI extensions added by the
SBI v0.3 specification.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
|
SBI v0.2 base extension defined to allow backward compatibility and
probing of future extensions. This is also the only mandatory SBI
extension that must be implemented by SBI implementors.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
|
|
With SBI v0.2, there may be more SBI extensions in future. It makes more
sense to group related extensions in separate files. Guest kernel will
choose appropriate SBI version dynamically.
Move the existing implementation to a separate file so that it can be
removed in future without much conflict.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
|
|
The existing SBI specification impelementation follows v0.1
specification. The latest specification allows more scalability
and performance improvements.
Rename the existing implementation as v0.1 and provide a way
to allow future extensions.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
|
