summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-09-26arm64: Add types to indirect called assembly functionsSami Tolvanen1-0/+4
With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, assembly functions indirectly called from C code must be annotated with type identifiers to pass CFI checking. Use SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START for the indirectly called functions, and ensure we emit `bti c` also with SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START. Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220908215504.3686827-10-samitolvanen@google.com
2022-02-22arm64: clean up symbol aliasingMark Rutland1-24/+0
Now that we have SYM_FUNC_ALIAS() and SYM_FUNC_ALIAS_WEAK(), use those to simplify and more consistently define function aliases across arch/arm64. Aliases are now defined in terms of a canonical function name. For position-independent functions I've made the __pi_<func> name the canonical name, and defined other alises in terms of this. The SYM_FUNC_{START,END}_PI(func) macros obscure the __pi_<func> name, and make this hard to seatch for. The SYM_FUNC_START_WEAK_PI() macro also obscures the fact that the __pi_<func> fymbol is global and the <func> symbol is weak. For clarity, I have removed these macros and used SYM_FUNC_{START,END}() directly with the __pi_<func> name. For example: SYM_FUNC_START_WEAK_PI(func) ... asm insns ... SYM_FUNC_END_PI(func) EXPORT_SYMBOL(func) ... becomes: SYM_FUNC_START(__pi_func) ... asm insns ... SYM_FUNC_END(__pi_func) SYM_FUNC_ALIAS_WEAK(func, __pi_func) EXPORT_SYMBOL(func) For clarity, where there are multiple annotations such as EXPORT_SYMBOL(), I've tried to keep annotations grouped by symbol. For example, where a function has a name and an alias which are both exported, this is organised as: SYM_FUNC_START(func) ... asm insns ... SYM_FUNC_END(func) EXPORT_SYMBOL(func) SYM_FUNC_ALIAS(alias, func) EXPORT_SYMBOL(alias) For consistency with the other string functions, I've defined strrchr as a position-independent function, as it can safely be used as such even though we have no users today. As we no longer use SYM_FUNC_{START,END}_ALIAS(), our local copies are removed. The common versions will be removed by a subsequent patch. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220216162229.1076788-3-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2021-12-17arm64: Ensure that the 'bti' macro is defined where linkage.h is includedCatalin Marinas1-0/+4
Not all .S files include asm/assembler.h, however the SYM_FUNC_* definitions invoke the 'bti' macro. Include asm/assembler.h in asm/linkage.h. Fixes: 9be34be87cc8 ("arm64: Add macro version of the BTI instruction") Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2021-12-14arm64: Use BTI C directly and unconditionallyMark Brown1-16/+6
Now we have a macro for BTI C that looks like a regular instruction change all the users of the current BTI_C macro to just emit a BTI C directly and remove the macro. This does mean that we now unconditionally BTI annotate all assembly functions, meaning that they are worse in this respect than code generated by the compiler. The overhead should be minimal for implementations with a reasonable HINT implementation. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211214152714.2380849-4-broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2021-12-14arm64: Unconditionally override SYM_FUNC macrosMark Brown1-5/+11
Currently we only override the SYM_FUNC macros when we need to insert BTI C into them, do this unconditionally to make it more likely that we'll notice bugs in our override. Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211214152714.2380849-3-broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2021-12-14arm64: Add macro version of the BTI instructionMark Brown1-6/+1
BTI is only available from v8.5 so we need to encode it using HINT in generic code and for older toolchains. Add an assembler macro based on one written by Mark Rutland which lets us use the mnemonic and update the existing users. Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211214152714.2380849-2-broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2021-06-01arm64: Add assembly annotations for weak-PI-alias madnessRobin Murphy1-0/+8
Add yet another set of assembly symbol annotations, this time for the borderline-absurd situation of a function aliasing to a weak symbol which itself also wants a position-independent alias. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/75545b3c4129b20b887474bb58a9cf302bf2132b.1622128527.git.robin.murphy@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-06-24arm64: Don't insert a BTI instruction at inner labelsJean-Philippe Brucker1-6/+0
Some ftrace features are broken since commit 714a8d02ca4d ("arm64: asm: Override SYM_FUNC_START when building the kernel with BTI"). For example the function_graph tracer: $ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer [ 36.107016] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 115 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2691 ftrace_modify_all_code+0xc8/0x14c When ftrace_modify_graph_caller() attempts to write a branch at ftrace_graph_call, it finds the "BTI J" instruction inserted by SYM_INNER_LABEL() instead of a NOP, and aborts. It turns out we don't currently need the BTI landing pads inserted by SYM_INNER_LABEL: * ftrace_call and ftrace_graph_call are only used for runtime patching of the active tracer. The patched code is not reached from a branch. * install_el2_stub is reached from a CBZ instruction, which doesn't change PSTATE.BTYPE. * __guest_exit is reached from B instructions in the hyp-entry vectors, which aren't subject to BTI checks either. Remove the BTI annotation from SYM_INNER_LABEL. Fixes: 714a8d02ca4d ("arm64: asm: Override SYM_FUNC_START when building the kernel with BTI") Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624112253.1602786-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-05-21arm64: vdso: Don't prefix sigreturn trampoline with a BTI C instructionWill Deacon1-3/+3
For better or worse, GDB relies on the exact instruction sequence in the VDSO sigreturn trampoline in order to unwind from signals correctly. Commit c91db232da48 ("arm64: vdso: Convert to modern assembler annotations") unfortunately added a BTI C instruction to the start of __kernel_rt_sigreturn, which breaks this check. Thankfully, it's also not required, since the trampoline is called from a RET instruction when returning from the signal handler Remove the unnecessary BTI C instruction from __kernel_rt_sigreturn, and do the same for the 32-bit VDSO as well for good measure. Cc: Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com> Cc: Tamas Zsoldos <tamas.zsoldos@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Fixes: c91db232da48 ("arm64: vdso: Convert to modern assembler annotations") Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-05-07arm64: asm: Override SYM_FUNC_START when building the kernel with BTIMark Brown1-0/+46
When the kernel is built for BTI override SYM_FUNC_START and related macros to add a BTI landing pad to the start of all global functions, ensuring that they are BTI safe. The ; at the end of the BTI_x macros is for the benefit of the macro-generated functions in xen-hypercall.S. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506195138.22086-4-broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-01-08arm64: asm: Add new-style position independent function annotationsMark Brown1-0/+16
As part of an effort to make the annotations in assembly code clearer and more consistent new macros have been introduced, including replacements for ENTRY() and ENDPROC(). On arm64 we have ENDPIPROC(), a custom version of ENDPROC() which is used for code that will need to run in position independent environments like EFI, it creates an alias for the function with the prefix __pi_ and then emits the standard ENDPROC. Add new-style macros to replace this which expand to the standard SYM_FUNC_*() and SYM_FUNC_ALIAS_*(), resulting in the same object code. These are added in linkage.h for consistency with where the generic assembler code has its macros. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> [will: Rename 'WEAK' macro, use ';' instead of ASM_NL, deprecate ENDPIPROC] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2017-09-18arm64: relax assembly code alignment from 16 byte to 4 byteMasahiro Yamada1-2/+2
Aarch64 instructions must be word aligned. The current 16 byte alignment is more than enough. Relax it into 4 byte alignment. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2012-10-20arm64: fix alignment padding in assembly codeMarc Zyngier1-0/+7
An interesting effect of using the generic version of linkage.h is that the padding is defined in terms of x86 NOPs, which can have even more interesting effects when the assembly code looks like this: ENTRY(func1) mov x0, xzr ENDPROC(func1) // fall through ENTRY(func2) mov x0, #1 ret ENDPROC(func2) Admittedly, the code is not very nice. But having code from another architecture doesn't look completely sane either. The fix is to add arm64's version of linkage.h, which causes the insertion of proper AArch64 NOPs. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>