summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu: enable GPU reset by default on renoirAlex Deucher1-0/+1
Everything is in place. Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu: enable GPU reset by default on NaviAlex Deucher1-0/+3
Has been working fine for a while. Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amd/display: do not allocate display_mode_lib unnecessarilyDor Askayo1-8/+9
This allocation isn't required and can fail when resuming from suspend. Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/issues/1009 Signed-off-by: Dor Askayo <dor.askayo@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu: add coreboot workaround for KV/KBChristian König1-1/+2
Coreboot seems to have a problem correctly setting up access to the stolen VRAM on KV/KB. Use the direct access only when necessary. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Fredrik Bruhn <fredrik.bruhn@unibap.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28Revert "drm/amd/display: Don't skip link training for empty dongle"Harry Wentland1-8/+2
This reverts commit 80adaebd2d411b7d6872a097634848a71eb13d20. [WHY] This change was working around a regression that occured in this: commit 0301ccbaf67d ("drm/amd/display: DP Compliance 400.1.1 failure") With the fix to run verify_link_cap when the SINK_COUNT of dongles becomes non-zero this change is no longer needed. Cc: Louis Li <Ching-shih.Li@amd.com> Cc: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com> Cc: Hersen Wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com> Cc: Eric Yang <Eric.Yang2@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amd/display: Retrain dongles when SINK_COUNT becomes non-zeroHarry Wentland1-2/+1
[WHY] Two years ago the patch referenced by the Fixes tag stopped running dp_verify_link_cap_with_retries during DP detection when the reason for the detection was a short-pulse interrupt. This effectively meant that we were no longer doing the verify_link_cap training on active dongles when their SINK_COUNT changed from 0 to 1. A year ago this was partly remedied with: commit 80adaebd2d41 ("drm/amd/display: Don't skip link training for empty dongle") This made sure that we trained the dongle on initial hotplug (without connected downstream devices). This is all fine and dandy if it weren't for the fact that there are some dongles on the market that don't like link training when SINK_COUNT is 0 These dongles will in fact indicate a SINK_COUNT of 0 immediately after hotplug, even when a downstream device is connected, and then trigger a shortpulse interrupt indicating a SINK_COUNT change to 1. In order to play nicely we will need our policy to not link train an active DP dongle when SINK_COUNT is 0 but ensure we train it when the SINK_COUNT changes to 1. [HOW] Call dp_verify_link_cap_with_retries on detection even when the detection is triggered from a short pulse interrupt. With this change we can also revert this commit which we'll do in a separate follow-up change: commit 80adaebd2d41 ("drm/amd/display: Don't skip link training for empty dongle") Fixes: 0301ccbaf67d ("drm/amd/display: DP Compliance 400.1.1 failure") Suggested-by: Louis Li <Ching-shih.Li@amd.com> Tested-by: Louis Li <Ching-shih.Li@amd.com> Cc: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com> Cc: Hersen Wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com> Cc: Eric Yang <Eric.Yang2@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu: original raven doesn't support full asic resetAlex Deucher1-0/+4
So don't use it. Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu: attempt to enable gfxoff on more raven1 boards (v2)Alex Deucher1-4/+40
Switch to a blacklist so we can disable specific boards that are problematic. v2: make the blacklist non-raven specific. Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amd/amdgpu: fix spelling mistake "to" -> "too"Colin Ian King1-1/+1
There is a spelling mistake in a DRM_ERROR message. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amd/powerplay: use true, false for bool variable in smu7_hwmgr.czhengbin1-3/+3
Fixes coccicheck warning: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:723:2-50: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:733:3-52: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:747:3-51: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu: fix doc by clarifying sched_list definitionNirmoy Das2-3/+4
expand sched_list definition for better understanding. Also fix a typo atleast -> at least Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu: initialize bo_va_list when add gws to processxinhui pan1-0/+1
bo_va_list is list_head, so initialize it. Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Feifei Xu <Feifei.Xu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu/vcn: use inst_idx relacing instJames Zhu1-12/+12
Use inst_idx relacing inst in SOC15_DPG_MODE macro to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu/vcn: fix typo errorJames Zhu1-1/+1
Fix typo error, should be inst_idx instead of inst. Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu/vcn: fix vcn2.5 instance issueJames Zhu1-44/+44
Fix vcn2.5 instance issue, vcn0 and vcn1 have same register offset Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu/vcn2.5: fix a bug for the 2nd vcn instance (v2)James Zhu1-5/+8
Fix a bug for the 2nd vcn instance at start and stop. v2: squash in unused label removal. Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu/vcn: Share vcn_v2_0_dec_ring_test_ring to vcn2.5James Zhu3-2/+3
Share vcn_v2_0_dec_ring_test_ring to vcn2.5 to support vcn software ring. Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu: Use the correct flush_type in flush_gpu_tlb_pasidFelix Kuehling2-4/+4
The flush_type was incorrectly hard-coded to 0 when calling falling back to MMIO-based invalidation in flush_gpu_tlb_pasid. Fixes: ea930000a6dc ("drm/amdgpu: export function to flush TLB via pasid") Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Oak Zeng <Oak.Zeng@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/amdgpu: Fix TLB invalidation request when using semaphoreFelix Kuehling2-6/+7
Use a more meaningful variable name for the invalidation request that is distinct from the tmp variable that gets overwritten when acquiring the invalidation semaphore. Fixes: 4ed8a03740d0 ("drm/amdgpu: invalidate mmhub semaphore workaround in gmc9/gmc10") Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Yong Zhao <Yong.Zhao@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-28drm/i915/perf: Fix OA context id overlap with idle context idUmesh Nerlige Ramappa2-3/+9
Engine context pinned in perf OA was set to same context id as the idle context. Set the context id to an unused value. Clear the sw context id field in lrc descriptor before ORing with ce->tag (Chris) Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/756 Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200124013701.40609-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
2020-01-28drm/i915/gt: Acquire ce->active before ce->pin_count/ce->pin_mutexChris Wilson2-21/+31
Similar to commit ac0e331a628b ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release") we have the same race of trying to pin the context underneath a mutex while allowing the decrement to be atomic outside of that mutex. This leads to the problem where two threads may simultaneously try to pin the context and the second not notice that they needed to repin the context. <2> [198.669621] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c:387! <4> [198.669703] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI <4> [198.669712] CPU: 0 PID: 1246 Comm: gem_exec_create Tainted: G U W 5.5.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_7755+ #1 <4> [198.669723] Hardware name: /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017 <4> [198.669776] RIP: 0010:timeline_advance+0x7b/0xe0 [i915] <4> [198.669785] Code: 00 48 c7 c2 10 f1 46 a0 48 c7 c7 70 1b 32 a0 e8 bb dd e7 e0 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 d1 af e7 e0 31 f6 bf 09 00 00 00 e8 35 ef d8 e0 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c1 48 fa 49 a0 ba 84 01 00 00 48 c7 c6 10 f1 46 a0 48 <4> [198.669803] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004c3a38 EFLAGS: 00010296 <4> [198.669810] RAX: ffff888270b35140 RBX: ffff88826f32ee00 RCX: 0000000000000006 <4> [198.669818] RDX: 00000000000017c5 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000009 <4> [198.669826] RBP: ffffc900004c3a64 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 <4> [198.669834] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88826f9b5980 <4> [198.669841] R13: 0000000000000cc0 R14: ffffc900004c3dc0 R15: ffff888253610068 <4> [198.669849] FS: 00007f63e663fe40(0000) GS:ffff888276c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4> [198.669857] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4> [198.669864] CR2: 00007f171f8e39a8 CR3: 000000026b1f6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0 <4> [198.669872] Call Trace: <4> [198.669924] intel_timeline_get_seqno+0x12/0x40 [i915] <4> [198.669977] __i915_request_create+0x76/0x5a0 [i915] <4> [198.670024] i915_request_create+0x86/0x1c0 [i915] <4> [198.670068] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0xbf2/0x2500 [i915] <4> [198.670082] ? __lock_acquire+0x460/0x15d0 <4> [198.670128] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x11f/0x470 [i915] <4> [198.670171] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915] <4> [198.670181] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0 <4> [198.670188] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390 <4> [198.670233] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915] Fixes: 841350223816 ("drm/i915/gt: Drop mutex serialisation between context pin/unpin") References: ac0e331a628b ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200127152829.2842149-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-28drm/i915: Restore the kernel context after verifying the w/aChris Wilson1-0/+4
As a safety net, flush the engine verifications and restore the kernel context. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/971 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200126194618.2131078-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-27drm/i915/vlv_dsi_pll: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-24/+25
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/3a89bf4c8b312c233e6b219e9c73203608c3eaec.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/vlv_dsi: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-165/+180
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/436e4267529dc11cc7850d0a4f0703caa81b8c80.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/vdsc: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-164/+249
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/735389bfa1f9c4be8080f3187ea1dbde308d1ce2.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/sprite: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-145/+175
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/722f73a4529808ef7dad51c03c0a3775d8c5b052.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/psr: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-29/+41
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b7865c858374e9ab04cf2bc4ceb3d7d89c27db83.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/pipe_crc: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-10/+10
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/0af05f6035046a515097da398de8722c0ca23e56.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915: Give aux channels a better nameVille Syrjälä1-1/+2
The aux ch is used for more than DDC, so let's give it a better name. For maximum ease let's include both the AUX ch identifier and the port identifier (for cases where the VBT has redefined the relationship of the two). Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200123154542.12271-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2020-01-27drm/i915: Include the AUX CH name in the debug messagesVille Syrjälä1-11/+11
To make it easier to figure out what caused a particular debug message let's print out aux->name. v2: Rebase for drm_err() & co. Add some punctuation to the messages (Matt) Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200123154542.12271-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2020-01-27drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_releaseChris Wilson1-7/+9
As we use a mutex to serialise the first acquire (as it may be a lengthy operation), but only an atomic decrement for the release, we have to be careful in case a second thread races and completes both acquire/release as the first finishes its acquire. Thread A Thread B i915_active_acquire i915_active_acquire atomic_read() == 0 atomic_read() == 0 mutex_lock() mutex_lock() atomic_read() == 0 ref->active(); atomic_inc() mutex_unlock() atomic_read() == 1 i915_active_release atomic_dec_and_test() -> 0 ref->retire() atomic_inc() -> 1 mutex_unlock() So thread A has acquired the ref->active_count but since the ref was still active at the time, it did not initialise it. By switching the check inside the mutex to an atomic increment only if already active, we close the race. Fixes: c9ad602feabe ("drm/i915: Split i915_active.mutex into an irq-safe spinlock for the rbtree") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200126102346.1877661-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-27drm/i915/vga: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-3/+4
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ad357e65ddb85e7341416f0d7890661a3ef99298.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/tv: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-66/+72
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e6238e75f5a4155b1021736937b1fd7a0756a00.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/sdvo: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-15/+15
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b21dbc3c0f349345619590893c8ab96828c39103.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/panel: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-115/+140
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/efd117ff0a63ef6ec1a4514f2ee133ca33b3f0a0.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/overlay: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-22/+23
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/03a907100bf86e877247df804104c50240e3b38c.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/lvds: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-29/+28
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/75c2aa6ff0f0aa744de006c0bd6e33fb91b20994.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/lpe_audio: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-6/+8
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/d920b55fe225710169349db4819ca29af349e0b4.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/hdmi: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-125/+133
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/c89e66aaca33a1e26fa1372172be41da0ee1c62f.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/gmbus: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-39/+35
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1fca6f7e201fb2c75fcfff213ebd982a988eb40d.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/fifo_underrun: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-17/+20
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/fca7d63b3aa669b5984be45b5968f47fb0b64b2b.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/fbc: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-51/+55
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/bf67d57a7d760fb557325690f634799751d36f12.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/dvo: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-17/+17
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4898cb70cc12f54a3f5298c117ffc63b24b47d24.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/dsb: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-11/+13
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/fc2a561318089b9c80111039b2623eb3ad40e6a6.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/dp_mst: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-4/+7
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/06ba99067fc506bec4533202b046d63dda5cb1f2.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/dpll_mgr: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-187/+201
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/11c589dc6bbbed34374568d9a501a9df2e35d6b3.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/dpio_phy: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-37/+40
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/40fe2f095a9ecd4c4a1564101a0e07cc77b9ddf9.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/crt: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-25/+26
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/d66c0ea3abbed1ddb575e37da74b823b5085469a.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/color: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-90/+114
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/80d2cac864eb3f964587e74fbb004940889a2928.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/cdclk: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-65/+68
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/762b11289d22e1db46697c5b4596e49defc8190f.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com