diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/psi.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/psi.c | 657 |
1 files changed, 657 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..595414599b98 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c @@ -0,0 +1,657 @@ +/* + * Pressure stall information for CPU, memory and IO + * + * Copyright (c) 2018 Facebook, Inc. + * Author: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> + * + * When CPU, memory and IO are contended, tasks experience delays that + * reduce throughput and introduce latencies into the workload. Memory + * and IO contention, in addition, can cause a full loss of forward + * progress in which the CPU goes idle. + * + * This code aggregates individual task delays into resource pressure + * metrics that indicate problems with both workload health and + * resource utilization. + * + * Model + * + * The time in which a task can execute on a CPU is our baseline for + * productivity. Pressure expresses the amount of time in which this + * potential cannot be realized due to resource contention. + * + * This concept of productivity has two components: the workload and + * the CPU. To measure the impact of pressure on both, we define two + * contention states for a resource: SOME and FULL. + * + * In the SOME state of a given resource, one or more tasks are + * delayed on that resource. This affects the workload's ability to + * perform work, but the CPU may still be executing other tasks. + * + * In the FULL state of a given resource, all non-idle tasks are + * delayed on that resource such that nobody is advancing and the CPU + * goes idle. This leaves both workload and CPU unproductive. + * + * (Naturally, the FULL state doesn't exist for the CPU resource.) + * + * SOME = nr_delayed_tasks != 0 + * FULL = nr_delayed_tasks != 0 && nr_running_tasks == 0 + * + * The percentage of wallclock time spent in those compound stall + * states gives pressure numbers between 0 and 100 for each resource, + * where the SOME percentage indicates workload slowdowns and the FULL + * percentage indicates reduced CPU utilization: + * + * %SOME = time(SOME) / period + * %FULL = time(FULL) / period + * + * Multiple CPUs + * + * The more tasks and available CPUs there are, the more work can be + * performed concurrently. This means that the potential that can go + * unrealized due to resource contention *also* scales with non-idle + * tasks and CPUs. + * + * Consider a scenario where 257 number crunching tasks are trying to + * run concurrently on 256 CPUs. If we simply aggregated the task + * states, we would have to conclude a CPU SOME pressure number of + * 100%, since *somebody* is waiting on a runqueue at all + * times. However, that is clearly not the amount of contention the + * workload is experiencing: only one out of 256 possible exceution + * threads will be contended at any given time, or about 0.4%. + * + * Conversely, consider a scenario of 4 tasks and 4 CPUs where at any + * given time *one* of the tasks is delayed due to a lack of memory. + * Again, looking purely at the task state would yield a memory FULL + * pressure number of 0%, since *somebody* is always making forward + * progress. But again this wouldn't capture the amount of execution + * potential lost, which is 1 out of 4 CPUs, or 25%. + * + * To calculate wasted potential (pressure) with multiple processors, + * we have to base our calculation on the number of non-idle tasks in + * conjunction with the number of available CPUs, which is the number + * of potential execution threads. SOME becomes then the proportion of + * delayed tasks to possibe threads, and FULL is the share of possible + * threads that are unproductive due to delays: + * + * threads = min(nr_nonidle_tasks, nr_cpus) + * SOME = min(nr_delayed_tasks / threads, 1) + * FULL = (threads - min(nr_running_tasks, threads)) / threads + * + * For the 257 number crunchers on 256 CPUs, this yields: + * + * threads = min(257, 256) + * SOME = min(1 / 256, 1) = 0.4% + * FULL = (256 - min(257, 256)) / 256 = 0% + * + * For the 1 out of 4 memory-delayed tasks, this yields: + * + * threads = min(4, 4) + * SOME = min(1 / 4, 1) = 25% + * FULL = (4 - min(3, 4)) / 4 = 25% + * + * [ Substitute nr_cpus with 1, and you can see that it's a natural + * extension of the single-CPU model. ] + * + * Implementation + * + * To assess the precise time spent in each such state, we would have + * to freeze the system on task changes and start/stop the state + * clocks accordingly. Obviously that doesn't scale in practice. + * + * Because the scheduler aims to distribute the compute load evenly + * among the available CPUs, we can track task state locally to each + * CPU and, at much lower frequency, extrapolate the global state for + * the cumulative stall times and the running averages. + * + * For each runqueue, we track: + * + * tSOME[cpu] = time(nr_delayed_tasks[cpu] != 0) + * tFULL[cpu] = time(nr_delayed_tasks[cpu] && !nr_running_tasks[cpu]) + * tNONIDLE[cpu] = time(nr_nonidle_tasks[cpu] != 0) + * + * and then periodically aggregate: + * + * tNONIDLE = sum(tNONIDLE[i]) + * + * tSOME = sum(tSOME[i] * tNONIDLE[i]) / tNONIDLE + * tFULL = sum(tFULL[i] * tNONIDLE[i]) / tNONIDLE + * + * %SOME = tSOME / period + * %FULL = tFULL / period + * + * This gives us an approximation of pressure that is practical + * cost-wise, yet way more sensitive and accurate than periodic + * sampling of the aggregate task states would be. + */ + +#include <linux/sched/loadavg.h> +#include <linux/seq_file.h> +#include <linux/proc_fs.h> +#include <linux/seqlock.h> +#include <linux/cgroup.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/psi.h> +#include "sched.h" + +static int psi_bug __read_mostly; + +bool psi_disabled __read_mostly; +core_param(psi_disabled, psi_disabled, bool, 0644); + +/* Running averages - we need to be higher-res than loadavg */ +#define PSI_FREQ (2*HZ+1) /* 2 sec intervals */ +#define EXP_10s 1677 /* 1/exp(2s/10s) as fixed-point */ +#define EXP_60s 1981 /* 1/exp(2s/60s) */ +#define EXP_300s 2034 /* 1/exp(2s/300s) */ + +/* Sampling frequency in nanoseconds */ +static u64 psi_period __read_mostly; + +/* System-level pressure and stall tracking */ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct psi_group_cpu, system_group_pcpu); +static struct psi_group psi_system = { + .pcpu = &system_group_pcpu, +}; + +static void psi_update_work(struct work_struct *work); + +static void group_init(struct psi_group *group) +{ + int cpu; + + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) + seqcount_init(&per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu)->seq); + group->next_update = sched_clock() + psi_period; + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&group->clock_work, psi_update_work); + mutex_init(&group->stat_lock); +} + +void __init psi_init(void) +{ + if (psi_disabled) + return; + + psi_period = jiffies_to_nsecs(PSI_FREQ); + group_init(&psi_system); +} + +static bool test_state(unsigned int *tasks, enum psi_states state) +{ + switch (state) { + case PSI_IO_SOME: + return tasks[NR_IOWAIT]; + case PSI_IO_FULL: + return tasks[NR_IOWAIT] && !tasks[NR_RUNNING]; + case PSI_MEM_SOME: + return tasks[NR_MEMSTALL]; + case PSI_MEM_FULL: + return tasks[NR_MEMSTALL] && !tasks[NR_RUNNING]; + case PSI_CPU_SOME: + return tasks[NR_RUNNING] > 1; + case PSI_NONIDLE: + return tasks[NR_IOWAIT] || tasks[NR_MEMSTALL] || + tasks[NR_RUNNING]; + default: + return false; + } +} + +static void get_recent_times(struct psi_group *group, int cpu, u32 *times) +{ + struct psi_group_cpu *groupc = per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu); + unsigned int tasks[NR_PSI_TASK_COUNTS]; + u64 now, state_start; + unsigned int seq; + int s; + + /* Snapshot a coherent view of the CPU state */ + do { + seq = read_seqcount_begin(&groupc->seq); + now = cpu_clock(cpu); + memcpy(times, groupc->times, sizeof(groupc->times)); + memcpy(tasks, groupc->tasks, sizeof(groupc->tasks)); + state_start = groupc->state_start; + } while (read_seqcount_retry(&groupc->seq, seq)); + + /* Calculate state time deltas against the previous snapshot */ + for (s = 0; s < NR_PSI_STATES; s++) { + u32 delta; + /* + * In addition to already concluded states, we also + * incorporate currently active states on the CPU, + * since states may last for many sampling periods. + * + * This way we keep our delta sampling buckets small + * (u32) and our reported pressure close to what's + * actually happening. + */ + if (test_state(tasks, s)) + times[s] += now - state_start; + + delta = times[s] - groupc->times_prev[s]; + groupc->times_prev[s] = times[s]; + + times[s] = delta; + } +} + +static void calc_avgs(unsigned long avg[3], int missed_periods, + u64 time, u64 period) +{ + unsigned long pct; + + /* Fill in zeroes for periods of no activity */ + if (missed_periods) { + avg[0] = calc_load_n(avg[0], EXP_10s, 0, missed_periods); + avg[1] = calc_load_n(avg[1], EXP_60s, 0, missed_periods); + avg[2] = calc_load_n(avg[2], EXP_300s, 0, missed_periods); + } + + /* Sample the most recent active period */ + pct = div_u64(time * 100, period); + pct *= FIXED_1; + avg[0] = calc_load(avg[0], EXP_10s, pct); + avg[1] = calc_load(avg[1], EXP_60s, pct); + avg[2] = calc_load(avg[2], EXP_300s, pct); +} + +static bool update_stats(struct psi_group *group) +{ + u64 deltas[NR_PSI_STATES - 1] = { 0, }; + unsigned long missed_periods = 0; + unsigned long nonidle_total = 0; + u64 now, expires, period; + int cpu; + int s; + + mutex_lock(&group->stat_lock); + + /* + * Collect the per-cpu time buckets and average them into a + * single time sample that is normalized to wallclock time. + * + * For averaging, each CPU is weighted by its non-idle time in + * the sampling period. This eliminates artifacts from uneven + * loading, or even entirely idle CPUs. + */ + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + u32 times[NR_PSI_STATES]; + u32 nonidle; + + get_recent_times(group, cpu, times); + + nonidle = nsecs_to_jiffies(times[PSI_NONIDLE]); + nonidle_total += nonidle; + + for (s = 0; s < PSI_NONIDLE; s++) + deltas[s] += (u64)times[s] * nonidle; + } + + /* + * Integrate the sample into the running statistics that are + * reported to userspace: the cumulative stall times and the + * decaying averages. + * + * Pressure percentages are sampled at PSI_FREQ. We might be + * called more often when the user polls more frequently than + * that; we might be called less often when there is no task + * activity, thus no data, and clock ticks are sporadic. The + * below handles both. + */ + + /* total= */ + for (s = 0; s < NR_PSI_STATES - 1; s++) + group->total[s] += div_u64(deltas[s], max(nonidle_total, 1UL)); + + /* avgX= */ + now = sched_clock(); + expires = group->next_update; + if (now < expires) + goto out; + if (now - expires > psi_period) + missed_periods = div_u64(now - expires, psi_period); + + /* + * The periodic clock tick can get delayed for various + * reasons, especially on loaded systems. To avoid clock + * drift, we schedule the clock in fixed psi_period intervals. + * But the deltas we sample out of the per-cpu buckets above + * are based on the actual time elapsing between clock ticks. + */ + group->next_update = expires + ((1 + missed_periods) * psi_period); + period = now - (group->last_update + (missed_periods * psi_period)); + group->last_update = now; + + for (s = 0; s < NR_PSI_STATES - 1; s++) { + u32 sample; + + sample = group->total[s] - group->total_prev[s]; + /* + * Due to the lockless sampling of the time buckets, + * recorded time deltas can slip into the next period, + * which under full pressure can result in samples in + * excess of the period length. + * + * We don't want to report non-sensical pressures in + * excess of 100%, nor do we want to drop such events + * on the floor. Instead we punt any overage into the + * future until pressure subsides. By doing this we + * don't underreport the occurring pressure curve, we + * just report it delayed by one period length. + * + * The error isn't cumulative. As soon as another + * delta slips from a period P to P+1, by definition + * it frees up its time T in P. + */ + if (sample > period) + sample = period; + group->total_prev[s] += sample; + calc_avgs(group->avg[s], missed_periods, sample, period); + } +out: + mutex_unlock(&group->stat_lock); + return nonidle_total; +} + +static void psi_update_work(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct delayed_work *dwork; + struct psi_group *group; + bool nonidle; + + dwork = to_delayed_work(work); + group = container_of(dwork, struct psi_group, clock_work); + + /* + * If there is task activity, periodically fold the per-cpu + * times and feed samples into the running averages. If things + * are idle and there is no data to process, stop the clock. + * Once restarted, we'll catch up the running averages in one + * go - see calc_avgs() and missed_periods. + */ + + nonidle = update_stats(group); + + if (nonidle) { + unsigned long delay = 0; + u64 now; + + now = sched_clock(); + if (group->next_update > now) + delay = nsecs_to_jiffies(group->next_update - now) + 1; + schedule_delayed_work(dwork, delay); + } +} + +static void record_times(struct psi_group_cpu *groupc, int cpu, + bool memstall_tick) +{ + u32 delta; + u64 now; + + now = cpu_clock(cpu); + delta = now - groupc->state_start; + groupc->state_start = now; + + if (test_state(groupc->tasks, PSI_IO_SOME)) { + groupc->times[PSI_IO_SOME] += delta; + if (test_state(groupc->tasks, PSI_IO_FULL)) + groupc->times[PSI_IO_FULL] += delta; + } + + if (test_state(groupc->tasks, PSI_MEM_SOME)) { + groupc->times[PSI_MEM_SOME] += delta; + if (test_state(groupc->tasks, PSI_MEM_FULL)) + groupc->times[PSI_MEM_FULL] += delta; + else if (memstall_tick) { + u32 sample; + /* + * Since we care about lost potential, a + * memstall is FULL when there are no other + * working tasks, but also when the CPU is + * actively reclaiming and nothing productive + * could run even if it were runnable. + * + * When the timer tick sees a reclaiming CPU, + * regardless of runnable tasks, sample a FULL + * tick (or less if it hasn't been a full tick + * since the last state change). + */ + sample = min(delta, (u32)jiffies_to_nsecs(1)); + groupc->times[PSI_MEM_FULL] += sample; + } + } + + if (test_state(groupc->tasks, PSI_CPU_SOME)) + groupc->times[PSI_CPU_SOME] += delta; + + if (test_state(groupc->tasks, PSI_NONIDLE)) + groupc->times[PSI_NONIDLE] += delta; +} + +static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu, + unsigned int clear, unsigned int set) +{ + struct psi_group_cpu *groupc; + unsigned int t, m; + + groupc = per_cpu_ptr(group->pcpu, cpu); + + /* + * First we assess the aggregate resource states this CPU's + * tasks have been in since the last change, and account any + * SOME and FULL time these may have resulted in. + * + * Then we update the task counts according to the state + * change requested through the @clear and @set bits. + */ + write_seqcount_begin(&groupc->seq); + + record_times(groupc, cpu, false); + + for (t = 0, m = clear; m; m &= ~(1 << t), t++) { + if (!(m & (1 << t))) + continue; + if (groupc->tasks[t] == 0 && !psi_bug) { + printk_deferred(KERN_ERR "psi: task underflow! cpu=%d t=%d tasks=[%u %u %u] clear=%x set=%x\n", + cpu, t, groupc->tasks[0], + groupc->tasks[1], groupc->tasks[2], + clear, set); + psi_bug = 1; + } + groupc->tasks[t]--; + } + + for (t = 0; set; set &= ~(1 << t), t++) + if (set & (1 << t)) + groupc->tasks[t]++; + + write_seqcount_end(&groupc->seq); + + if (!delayed_work_pending(&group->clock_work)) + schedule_delayed_work(&group->clock_work, PSI_FREQ); +} + +void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set) +{ + int cpu = task_cpu(task); + + if (!task->pid) + return; + + if (((task->psi_flags & set) || + (task->psi_flags & clear) != clear) && + !psi_bug) { + printk_deferred(KERN_ERR "psi: inconsistent task state! task=%d:%s cpu=%d psi_flags=%x clear=%x set=%x\n", + task->pid, task->comm, cpu, + task->psi_flags, clear, set); + psi_bug = 1; + } + + task->psi_flags &= ~clear; + task->psi_flags |= set; + + psi_group_change(&psi_system, cpu, clear, set); +} + +void psi_memstall_tick(struct task_struct *task, int cpu) +{ + struct psi_group_cpu *groupc; + + groupc = per_cpu_ptr(psi_system.pcpu, cpu); + write_seqcount_begin(&groupc->seq); + record_times(groupc, cpu, true); + write_seqcount_end(&groupc->seq); +} + +/** + * psi_memstall_enter - mark the beginning of a memory stall section + * @flags: flags to handle nested sections + * + * Marks the calling task as being stalled due to a lack of memory, + * such as waiting for a refault or performing reclaim. + */ +void psi_memstall_enter(unsigned long *flags) +{ + struct rq_flags rf; + struct rq *rq; + + if (psi_disabled) + return; + + *flags = current->flags & PF_MEMSTALL; + if (*flags) + return; + /* + * PF_MEMSTALL setting & accounting needs to be atomic wrt + * changes to the task's scheduling state, otherwise we can + * race with CPU migration. + */ + rq = this_rq_lock_irq(&rf); + + current->flags |= PF_MEMSTALL; + psi_task_change(current, 0, TSK_MEMSTALL); + + rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf); +} + +/** + * psi_memstall_leave - mark the end of an memory stall section + * @flags: flags to handle nested memdelay sections + * + * Marks the calling task as no longer stalled due to lack of memory. + */ +void psi_memstall_leave(unsigned long *flags) +{ + struct rq_flags rf; + struct rq *rq; + + if (psi_disabled) + return; + + if (*flags) + return; + /* + * PF_MEMSTALL clearing & accounting needs to be atomic wrt + * changes to the task's scheduling state, otherwise we could + * race with CPU migration. + */ + rq = this_rq_lock_irq(&rf); + + current->flags &= ~PF_MEMSTALL; + psi_task_change(current, TSK_MEMSTALL, 0); + + rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf); +} + +static int psi_show(struct seq_file *m, struct psi_group *group, + enum psi_res res) +{ + int full; + + if (psi_disabled) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + update_stats(group); + + for (full = 0; full < 2 - (res == PSI_CPU); full++) { + unsigned long avg[3]; + u64 total; + int w; + + for (w = 0; w < 3; w++) + avg[w] = group->avg[res * 2 + full][w]; + total = div_u64(group->total[res * 2 + full], NSEC_PER_USEC); + + seq_printf(m, "%s avg10=%lu.%02lu avg60=%lu.%02lu avg300=%lu.%02lu total=%llu\n", + full ? "full" : "some", + LOAD_INT(avg[0]), LOAD_FRAC(avg[0]), + LOAD_INT(avg[1]), LOAD_FRAC(avg[1]), + LOAD_INT(avg[2]), LOAD_FRAC(avg[2]), + total); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int psi_io_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) +{ + return psi_show(m, &psi_system, PSI_IO); +} + +static int psi_memory_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) +{ + return psi_show(m, &psi_system, PSI_MEM); +} + +static int psi_cpu_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) +{ + return psi_show(m, &psi_system, PSI_CPU); +} + +static int psi_io_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, psi_io_show, NULL); +} + +static int psi_memory_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, psi_memory_show, NULL); +} + +static int psi_cpu_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, psi_cpu_show, NULL); +} + +static const struct file_operations psi_io_fops = { + .open = psi_io_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = single_release, +}; + +static const struct file_operations psi_memory_fops = { + .open = psi_memory_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = single_release, +}; + +static const struct file_operations psi_cpu_fops = { + .open = psi_cpu_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = single_release, +}; + +static int __init psi_proc_init(void) +{ + proc_mkdir("pressure", NULL); + proc_create("pressure/io", 0, NULL, &psi_io_fops); + proc_create("pressure/memory", 0, NULL, &psi_memory_fops); + proc_create("pressure/cpu", 0, NULL, &psi_cpu_fops); + return 0; +} +module_init(psi_proc_init); |