diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c | 42 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c index 4b2330deed47..bf7c8c8b1350 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c @@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ struct smc_local { struct sk_buff * saved_skb; /* - . This keeps track of how many packets that I have - . sent out. When an TX_EMPTY interrupt comes, I know + . This keeps track of how many packets that I have + . sent out. When an TX_EMPTY interrupt comes, I know . that all of these have been sent. */ int packets_waiting; @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static void smc_reset( int ioaddr ) /* Note: It doesn't seem that waiting for the MMU busy is needed here, but this is a place where future chipsets _COULD_ break. Be wary - of issuing another MMU command right after this */ + of issuing another MMU command right after this */ outb( 0, ioaddr + INT_MASK ); } @@ -521,9 +521,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t smc_wait_to_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, SMC_SELECT_BANK( 2 ); outw( MC_ALLOC | numPages, ioaddr + MMU_CMD ); /* - . Performance Hack + . Performance Hack . - . wait a short amount of time.. if I can send a packet now, I send + . wait a short amount of time.. if I can send a packet now, I send . it now. Otherwise, I enable an interrupt and wait for one to be . available. . @@ -540,17 +540,17 @@ static netdev_tx_t smc_wait_to_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, if ( status & IM_ALLOC_INT ) { /* acknowledge the interrupt */ outb( IM_ALLOC_INT, ioaddr + INTERRUPT ); - break; + break; } - } while ( -- time_out ); + } while ( -- time_out ); - if ( !time_out ) { + if ( !time_out ) { /* oh well, wait until the chip finds memory later */ SMC_ENABLE_INT( IM_ALLOC_INT ); PRINTK2((CARDNAME": memory allocation deferred.\n")); /* it's deferred, but I'll handle it later */ return NETDEV_TX_OK; - } + } /* or YES! I can send the packet now.. */ smc_hardware_send_packet(dev); netif_wake_queue(dev); @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static void smc_hardware_send_packet( struct net_device * dev ) #endif /* send the packet length ( +6 for status, length and ctl byte ) - and the status word ( set to zeros ) */ + and the status word ( set to zeros ) */ #ifdef USE_32_BIT outl( (length +6 ) << 16 , ioaddr + DATA_1 ); #else @@ -629,8 +629,8 @@ static void smc_hardware_send_packet( struct net_device * dev ) /* send the actual data . I _think_ it's faster to send the longs first, and then . mop up by sending the last word. It depends heavily - . on alignment, at least on the 486. Maybe it would be - . a good idea to check which is optimal? But that could take + . on alignment, at least on the 486. Maybe it would be + . a good idea to check which is optimal? But that could take . almost as much time as is saved? */ #ifdef USE_32_BIT @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static int __init smc_findirq(int ioaddr) outb( IM_ALLOC_INT, ioaddr + INT_MASK ); /* - . Allocate 512 bytes of memory. Note that the chip was just + . Allocate 512 bytes of memory. Note that the chip was just . reset so all the memory is available */ outw( MC_ALLOC | 1, ioaddr + MMU_CMD ); @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) goto err_out; } /* The above MIGHT indicate a device, but I need to write to further - test this. */ + test this. */ outw( 0x0, ioaddr + BANK_SELECT ); bank = inw( ioaddr + BANK_SELECT ); if ( (bank & 0xFF00 ) != 0x3300 ) { @@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) goto err_out; } /* well, we've already written once, so hopefully another time won't - hurt. This time, I need to switch the bank register to bank 1, + hurt. This time, I need to switch the bank register to bank 1, so I can access the base address register */ SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); base_address_register = inw( ioaddr + BASE ); @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) dev->base_addr = ioaddr; /* - . Get the MAC address ( bank 1, regs 4 - 9 ) + . Get the MAC address ( bank 1, regs 4 - 9 ) */ SMC_SELECT_BANK( 1 ); for ( i = 0; i < 6; i += 2 ) { @@ -938,8 +938,8 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) /* Now, I want to find out more about the chip. This is sort of - redundant, but it's cleaner to have it in both, rather than having - one VERY long probe procedure. + redundant, but it's cleaner to have it in both, rather than having + one VERY long probe procedure. */ SMC_SELECT_BANK(3); revision_register = inw( ioaddr + REVISION ); @@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) /* . If dev->irq is 0, then the device has to be banged on to see . what the IRQ is. - . + . . This banging doesn't always detect the IRQ, for unknown reasons. . a workaround is to reset the chip and try again. . @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) . . Specifying an IRQ is done with the assumption that the user knows . what (s)he is doing. No checking is done!!!! - . + . */ if ( dev->irq < 2 ) { int trials; @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static int smc_open(struct net_device *dev) } /* - According to Becker, I have to set the hardware address + According to Becker, I have to set the hardware address at this point, because the (l)user can set it with an ioctl. Easily done... */ |