6 files changed, 92 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
index 36890b026e77..1c4e1825d769 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
@@ -251,11 +251,11 @@ selectively from different subsystems.
 .. code-block:: c
 
     struct kcov_remote_arg {
-	unsigned	trace_mode;
-	unsigned	area_size;
-	unsigned	num_handles;
-	uint64_t	common_handle;
-	uint64_t	handles[0];
+	__u32		trace_mode;
+	__u32		area_size;
+	__u32		num_handles;
+	__aligned_u64	common_handle;
+	__aligned_u64	handles[0];
     };
 
     #define KCOV_INIT_TRACE			_IOR('c', 1, unsigned long)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst
index ecdfdc9d4b03..61ae13c44f91 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst
@@ -203,12 +203,12 @@ Test Module
 Kselftest tests the kernel from userspace.  Sometimes things need
 testing from within the kernel, one method of doing this is to create a
 test module.  We can tie the module into the kselftest framework by
-using a shell script test runner.  ``kselftest_module.sh`` is designed
+using a shell script test runner.  ``kselftest/module.sh`` is designed
 to facilitate this process.  There is also a header file provided to
 assist writing kernel modules that are for use with kselftest:
 
 - ``tools/testing/kselftest/kselftest_module.h``
-- ``tools/testing/kselftest/kselftest_module.sh``
+- ``tools/testing/kselftest/kselftest/module.sh``
 
 How to use
 ----------
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ A bare bones test module might look like this:
 
    #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
 
-   #include "../tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_module.h"
+   #include "../tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/module.h"
 
    KSTM_MODULE_GLOBALS();
 
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ Example test script
 
     #!/bin/bash
     # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
-    $(dirname $0)/../kselftest_module.sh "foo" test_foo
+    $(dirname $0)/../kselftest/module.sh "foo" test_foo
 
 
 Test Harness
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
index 26ffb46bdf99..c60d760a0eed 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ KUnit - Unit Testing for the Linux Kernel
 
 	start
 	usage
+	kunit-tool
 	api/index
 	faq
 
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..50d46394e97e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit-tool.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=================
+kunit_tool How-To
+=================
+
+What is kunit_tool?
+===================
+
+kunit_tool is a script (``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``) that aids in building
+the Linux kernel as UML (`User Mode Linux
+<http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/>`_), running KUnit tests, parsing
+the test results and displaying them in a user friendly manner.
+
+What is a kunitconfig?
+======================
+
+It's just a defconfig that kunit_tool looks for in the base directory.
+kunit_tool uses it to generate a .config as you might expect. In addition, it
+verifies that the generated .config contains the CONFIG options in the
+kunitconfig; the reason it does this is so that it is easy to be sure that a
+CONFIG that enables a test actually ends up in the .config.
+
+How do I use kunit_tool?
+========================
+
+If a kunitconfig is present at the root directory, all you have to do is:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
+
+However, you most likely want to use it with the following options:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --timeout=30 --jobs=`nproc --all`
+
+- ``--timeout`` sets a maximum amount of time to allow tests to run.
+- ``--jobs`` sets the number of threads to use to build the kernel.
+
+If you just want to use the defconfig that ships with the kernel, you can
+append the ``--defconfig`` flag as well:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --timeout=30 --jobs=`nproc --all` --defconfig
+
+.. note::
+	This command is particularly helpful for getting started because it
+	just works. No kunitconfig needs to be present.
+
+For a list of all the flags supported by kunit_tool, you can run:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --help
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
index aeeddfafeea2..4e1d24db6b13 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
@@ -19,21 +19,21 @@ The wrapper can be run with:
 
 .. code-block:: bash
 
-   ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --defconfig
 
-Creating a kunitconfig
-======================
-The Python script is a thin wrapper around Kbuild as such, it needs to be
-configured with a ``kunitconfig`` file. This file essentially contains the
+For more information on this wrapper (also called kunit_tool) checkout the
+:doc:`kunit-tool` page.
+
+Creating a .kunitconfig
+=======================
+The Python script is a thin wrapper around Kbuild. As such, it needs to be
+configured with a ``.kunitconfig`` file. This file essentially contains the
 regular Kernel config, with the specific test targets as well.
 
 .. code-block:: bash
 
-	git clone -b master https://kunit.googlesource.com/kunitconfig $PATH_TO_KUNITCONFIG_REPO
 	cd $PATH_TO_LINUX_REPO
-	ln -s $PATH_TO_KUNIT_CONFIG_REPO/kunitconfig kunitconfig
-
-You may want to add kunitconfig to your local gitignore.
+	cp arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig .kunitconfig
 
 Verifying KUnit Works
 ---------------------
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ If everything worked correctly, you should see the following:
 followed by a list of tests that are run. All of them should be passing.
 
 .. note::
-   Because it is building a lot of sources for the first time, the ``Building
-   kunit kernel`` step may take a while.
+	Because it is building a lot of sources for the first time, the
+	``Building KUnit kernel`` step may take a while.
 
 Writing your first test
 =======================
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ and the following to ``drivers/misc/Makefile``:
 
 	obj-$(CONFIG_MISC_EXAMPLE_TEST) += example-test.o
 
-Now add it to your ``kunitconfig``:
+Now add it to your ``.kunitconfig``:
 
 .. code-block:: none
 
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ Now you can run the test:
 
 .. code-block:: bash
 
-	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
 
 You should see the following failure:
 
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
index c6e69634e274..b9a065ab681e 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Organization of this document
 =============================
 
 This document is organized into two main sections: Testing and Isolating
-Behavior. The first covers what a unit test is and how to use KUnit to write
+Behavior. The first covers what unit tests are and how to use KUnit to write
 them. The second covers how to use KUnit to isolate code and make it possible
 to unit test code that was otherwise un-unit-testable.
 
@@ -174,13 +174,13 @@ Test Suites
 ~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 Now obviously one unit test isn't very helpful; the power comes from having
-many test cases covering all of your behaviors. Consequently it is common to
-have many *similar* tests; in order to reduce duplication in these closely
-related tests most unit testing frameworks provide the concept of a *test
-suite*, in KUnit we call it a *test suite*; all it is is just a collection of
-test cases for a unit of code with a set up function that gets invoked before
-every test cases and then a tear down function that gets invoked after every
-test case completes.
+many test cases covering all of a unit's behaviors. Consequently it is common
+to have many *similar* tests; in order to reduce duplication in these closely
+related tests most unit testing frameworks - including KUnit - provide the
+concept of a *test suite*. A *test suite* is just a collection of test cases
+for a unit of code with a set up function that gets invoked before every test
+case and then a tear down function that gets invoked after every test case
+completes.
 
 Example:
 
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ KUnit test framework.
 .. note::
    A test case will only be run if it is associated with a test suite.
 
-For a more information on these types of things see the :doc:`api/test`.
+For more information on these types of things see the :doc:`api/test`.
 
 Isolating Behavior
 ==================
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ We can easily test this code by *faking out* the underlying EEPROM:
 		return count;
 	}
 
-	ssize_t fake_eeprom_write(struct eeprom *this, size_t offset, const char *buffer, size_t count)
+	ssize_t fake_eeprom_write(struct eeprom *parent, size_t offset, const char *buffer, size_t count)
 	{
 		struct fake_eeprom *this = container_of(parent, struct fake_eeprom, parent);
 
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ KUnit on non-UML architectures
 By default KUnit uses UML as a way to provide dependencies for code under test.
 Under most circumstances KUnit's usage of UML should be treated as an
 implementation detail of how KUnit works under the hood. Nevertheless, there
-are instances where being able to run architecture specific code, or test
+are instances where being able to run architecture specific code or test
 against real hardware is desirable. For these reasons KUnit supports running on
 other architectures.
 
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ run your tests on your hardware setup just by compiling for your architecture.
 .. important::
    Always prefer tests that run on UML to tests that only run under a particular
    architecture, and always prefer tests that run under QEMU or another easy
-   (and monitarily free) to obtain software environment to a specific piece of
+   (and monetarily free) to obtain software environment to a specific piece of
    hardware.
 
 Nevertheless, there are still valid reasons to write an architecture or hardware