summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/dev-tools
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/dev-tools')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst2
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst2
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst2
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst18
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst15
5 files changed, 23 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
index c09c9ca2ff1c..2b68addaadcd 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
@@ -295,11 +295,13 @@ print the number of the test and the status of the test:
pass::
ok 28 - kmalloc_double_kzfree
+
or, if kmalloc failed::
# kmalloc_large_oob_right: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:163
Expected ptr is not null, but is
not ok 4 - kmalloc_large_oob_right
+
or, if a KASAN report was expected, but not found::
# kmalloc_double_kzfree: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:629
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
index 1628862e7024..8d5029ad210a 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ things to try.
re-run kunit_tool.
5. Try to run ``make ARCH=um defconfig`` before running ``kunit.py run``. This
may help clean up any residual config items which could be causing problems.
-6. Finally, try running KUnit outside UML. KUnit and KUnit tests can run be
+6. Finally, try running KUnit outside UML. KUnit and KUnit tests can be
built into any kernel, or can be built as a module and loaded at runtime.
Doing so should allow you to determine if UML is causing the issue you're
seeing. When tests are built-in, they will execute when the kernel boots, and
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
index d23385e3e159..454f307813ea 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ Now add the following to ``drivers/misc/Kconfig``:
config MISC_EXAMPLE_TEST
bool "Test for my example"
- depends on MISC_EXAMPLE && KUNIT
+ depends on MISC_EXAMPLE && KUNIT=y
and the following to ``drivers/misc/Makefile``:
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst
index da1d6f0ed6bc..8dbcdc552606 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst
@@ -175,17 +175,17 @@ An example Kconfig entry:
.. code-block:: none
- config FOO_KUNIT_TEST
- tristate "KUnit test for foo" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
- depends on KUNIT
- default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
- help
- This builds unit tests for foo.
+ config FOO_KUNIT_TEST
+ tristate "KUnit test for foo" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on KUNIT
+ default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ help
+ This builds unit tests for foo.
- For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer
- to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit
+ For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer
+ to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
- If unsure, say N
+ If unsure, say N.
Test File and Module Names
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
index 961d3ea3ca19..9c28c518e6a3 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ behavior of a function called ``add``; the first parameter is always of type
the second parameter, in this case, is what the value is expected to be; the
last value is what the value actually is. If ``add`` passes all of these
expectations, the test case, ``add_test_basic`` will pass; if any one of these
-expectations fail, the test case will fail.
+expectations fails, the test case will fail.
It is important to understand that a test case *fails* when any expectation is
violated; however, the test will continue running, potentially trying other
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ Example:
kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite);
In the above example the test suite, ``example_test_suite``, would run the test
-cases ``example_test_foo``, ``example_test_bar``, and ``example_test_baz``,
+cases ``example_test_foo``, ``example_test_bar``, and ``example_test_baz``;
each would have ``example_test_init`` called immediately before it and would
have ``example_test_exit`` called immediately after it.
``kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite)`` registers the test suite with the
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ through some sort of indirection where a function is exposed as part of an API
such that the definition of that function can be changed without affecting the
rest of the code base. In the kernel this primarily comes from two constructs,
classes, structs that contain function pointers that are provided by the
-implementer, and architecture specific functions which have definitions selected
+implementer, and architecture-specific functions which have definitions selected
at compile time.
Classes
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ KUnit on non-UML architectures
By default KUnit uses UML as a way to provide dependencies for code under test.
Under most circumstances KUnit's usage of UML should be treated as an
implementation detail of how KUnit works under the hood. Nevertheless, there
-are instances where being able to run architecture specific code or test
+are instances where being able to run architecture-specific code or test
against real hardware is desirable. For these reasons KUnit supports running on
other architectures.
@@ -561,6 +561,11 @@ Once the kernel is built and installed, a simple
...will run the tests.
+.. note::
+ Note that you should make sure your test depends on ``KUNIT=y`` in Kconfig
+ if the test does not support module build. Otherwise, it will trigger
+ compile errors if ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` is ``m``.
+
Writing new tests for other architectures
-----------------------------------------
@@ -594,7 +599,7 @@ writing normal KUnit tests. One special caveat is that you have to reset
hardware state in between test cases; if this is not possible, you may only be
able to run one test case per invocation.
-.. TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Add an actual example of an architecture
+.. TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Add an actual example of an architecture-
dependent KUnit test.
KUnit debugfs representation