summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/virt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHou Wenlong <houwenlong93@linux.alibaba.com>2022-01-27 09:54:49 +0300
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2022-01-28 15:38:27 +0300
commit6a0c61703e3a5d67845a4b275e1d9d7bc1b5aad7 (patch)
tree03c69546979d8482bd783a3f8192ba122ed89df8 /virt
parent6cbbaab60ff33f59355492c241318046befd9ffc (diff)
downloadlinux-6a0c61703e3a5d67845a4b275e1d9d7bc1b5aad7.tar.xz
KVM: eventfd: Fix false positive RCU usage warning
Fix the following false positive warning: ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.16.0-rc4+ #57 Not tainted ----------------------------- arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:484 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 3 locks held by fc_vcpu 0/330: #0: ffff8884835fc0b0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x88/0x6f0 [kvm] #1: ffffc90004c0bb68 (&kvm->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: vcpu_enter_guest+0x600/0x1860 [kvm] #2: ffffc90004c0c1d0 (&kvm->irq_srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: kvm_notify_acked_irq+0x36/0x180 [kvm] stack backtrace: CPU: 26 PID: 330 Comm: fc_vcpu 0 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4+ Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x57 kvm_notify_acked_gsi+0x6b/0x70 [kvm] kvm_notify_acked_irq+0x8d/0x180 [kvm] kvm_ioapic_update_eoi+0x92/0x240 [kvm] kvm_apic_set_eoi_accelerated+0x2a/0xe0 [kvm] handle_apic_eoi_induced+0x3d/0x60 [kvm_intel] vmx_handle_exit+0x19c/0x6a0 [kvm_intel] vcpu_enter_guest+0x66e/0x1860 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x438/0x7f0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x38a/0x6f0 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x89/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Since kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier() does synchronize_srcu(&kvm->irq_srcu), kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list is protected by kvm->irq_srcu. In fact, kvm->irq_srcu SRCU read lock is held in kvm_notify_acked_irq(), making it a false positive warning. So use hlist_for_each_entry_srcu() instead of hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(). Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong93@linux.alibaba.com> Message-Id: <f98bac4f5052bad2c26df9ad50f7019e40434512.1643265976.git.houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt')
-rw-r--r--virt/kvm/eventfd.c8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index 2ad013b8bde9..59b1dd4a549e 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ bool kvm_irq_has_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin)
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->irq_srcu);
gsi = kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(kvm, irqchip, pin);
if (gsi != -1)
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
- link)
+ hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
+ link, srcu_read_lock_held(&kvm->irq_srcu))
if (kian->gsi == gsi) {
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->irq_srcu, idx);
return true;
@@ -480,8 +480,8 @@ void kvm_notify_acked_gsi(struct kvm *kvm, int gsi)
{
struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian;
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
- link)
+ hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
+ link, srcu_read_lock_held(&kvm->irq_srcu))
if (kian->gsi == gsi)
kian->irq_acked(kian);
}