diff options
author | Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> | 2024-05-12 00:22:43 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2024-05-13 03:41:44 +0300 |
commit | ba39486d2c43ba7c103c438540aa56c8bde3b6c7 (patch) | |
tree | d948584d73987d413508c2ad82f3f7832494446b /tools/testing/selftests | |
parent | 6a2f786e6905007e82bac212296deca29815916d (diff) | |
download | linux-ba39486d2c43ba7c103c438540aa56c8bde3b6c7.tar.xz |
bpf: make list_for_each_entry portable
[Changes from V1:
- The __compat_break has been abandoned in favor of
a more readable can_loop macro that can be used anywhere, including
loop conditions.]
The macro list_for_each_entry is defined in bpf_arena_list.h as
follows:
#define list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member) \
for (void * ___tmp = (pos = list_entry_safe((head)->first, \
typeof(*(pos)), member), \
(void *)0); \
pos && ({ ___tmp = (void *)pos->member.next; 1; }); \
cond_break, \
pos = list_entry_safe((void __arena *)___tmp, typeof(*(pos)), member))
The macro cond_break, in turn, expands to a statement expression that
contains a `break' statement. Compound statement expressions, and the
subsequent ability of placing statements in the header of a `for'
loop, are GNU extensions.
Unfortunately, clang implements this GNU extension differently than
GCC:
- In GCC the `break' statement is bound to the containing "breakable"
context in which the defining `for' appears. If there is no such
context, GCC emits a warning: break statement without enclosing `for'
o `switch' statement.
- In clang the `break' statement is bound to the defining `for'. If
the defining `for' is itself inside some breakable construct, then
clang emits a -Wgcc-compat warning.
This patch adds a new macro can_loop to bpf_experimental, that
implements the same logic than cond_break but evaluates to a boolean
expression. The patch also changes all the current instances of usage
of cond_break withing the header of loop accordingly.
Tested in bpf-next master.
No regressions.
Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: david.faust@oracle.com
Cc: cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240511212243.23477-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests')
4 files changed, 38 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_arena_list.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_arena_list.h index b99b9f408eff..85dbc3ea4da5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_arena_list.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_arena_list.h @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ static inline void *bpf_iter_num_new(struct bpf_iter_num *it, int i, int j) { re static inline void bpf_iter_num_destroy(struct bpf_iter_num *it) {} static inline bool bpf_iter_num_next(struct bpf_iter_num *it) { return true; } #define cond_break ({}) +#define can_loop true #endif /* Safely walk link list elements. Deletion of elements is allowed. */ @@ -36,8 +37,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_iter_num_next(struct bpf_iter_num *it) { return true; } for (void * ___tmp = (pos = list_entry_safe((head)->first, \ typeof(*(pos)), member), \ (void *)0); \ - pos && ({ ___tmp = (void *)pos->member.next; 1; }); \ - cond_break, \ + pos && ({ ___tmp = (void *)pos->member.next; 1; }) && can_loop; \ pos = list_entry_safe((void __arena *)___tmp, typeof(*(pos)), member)) static inline void list_add_head(arena_list_node_t *n, arena_list_head_t *h) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h index 8b9cc87be4c4..3d9e4b8c6b81 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h @@ -326,19 +326,48 @@ l_true: \ }) #endif +/* + * Note that cond_break can only be portably used in the body of a breakable + * construct, whereas can_loop can be used anywhere. + */ #ifdef __BPF_FEATURE_MAY_GOTO +#define can_loop \ + ({ __label__ l_break, l_continue; \ + bool ret = true; \ + asm volatile goto("may_goto %l[l_break]" \ + :::: l_break); \ + goto l_continue; \ + l_break: ret = false; \ + l_continue:; \ + ret; \ + }) + #define cond_break \ ({ __label__ l_break, l_continue; \ - asm volatile goto("may_goto %l[l_break]" \ + asm volatile goto("may_goto %l[l_break]" \ :::: l_break); \ goto l_continue; \ l_break: break; \ l_continue:; \ }) #else +#define can_loop \ + ({ __label__ l_break, l_continue; \ + bool ret = true; \ + asm volatile goto("1:.byte 0xe5; \ + .byte 0; \ + .long ((%l[l_break] - 1b - 8) / 8) & 0xffff; \ + .short 0" \ + :::: l_break); \ + goto l_continue; \ + l_break: ret = false; \ + l_continue:; \ + ret; \ + }) + #define cond_break \ ({ __label__ l_break, l_continue; \ - asm volatile goto("1:.byte 0xe5; \ + asm volatile goto("1:.byte 0xe5; \ .byte 0; \ .long ((%l[l_break] - 1b - 8) / 8) & 0xffff; \ .short 0" \ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_list.c index c0422c58cee2..93bd0600eba0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_list.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ int arena_list_add(void *ctx) list_head = &global_head; - for (i = zero; i < cnt; cond_break, i++) { + for (i = zero; i < cnt && can_loop; i++) { struct elem __arena *n = bpf_alloc(sizeof(*n)); test_val++; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c index 99e561f18f9b..bd676d7e615f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ int cond_break1(const void *ctx) unsigned long i; unsigned int sum = 0; - for (i = zero; i < ARR_SZ; cond_break, i++) + for (i = zero; i < ARR_SZ && can_loop; i++) sum += i; for (i = zero; i < ARR_SZ; i++) { barrier_var(i); @@ -336,12 +336,11 @@ int cond_break2(const void *ctx) int i, j; int sum = 0; - for (i = zero; i < 1000; cond_break, i++) + for (i = zero; i < 1000 && can_loop; i++) for (j = zero; j < 1000; j++) { sum += i + j; cond_break; - } - + } return sum; } @@ -349,7 +348,7 @@ static __noinline int loop(void) { int i, sum = 0; - for (i = zero; i <= 1000000; i++, cond_break) + for (i = zero; i <= 1000000 && can_loop; i++) sum += i; return sum; |