summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/vm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>2022-10-04 22:34:00 +0300
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2022-10-13 04:51:50 +0300
commit26c92d37d3dc484157bdb4eb7d29991c017b168b (patch)
tree8315ac0af29354c34602ad71f21948f1b53b50da /tools/testing/selftests/vm
parentf9bf6c03eca1077cae8de0e6d86427656fa42a9b (diff)
downloadlinux-26c92d37d3dc484157bdb4eb7d29991c017b168b.tar.xz
mm/selftest: uffd: explain the write missing fault check
It's not obvious why we had a write check for each of the missing messages, especially when it should be a locking op. Add a rich comment for that, and also try to explain its good side and limitations, so that if someone hit it again for either a bug or a different glibc impl there'll be some clue to start with. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221004193400.110155-4-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/vm')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c22
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index 74babdbc02e5..297f250c1d95 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -774,7 +774,27 @@ static void uffd_handle_page_fault(struct uffd_msg *msg,
continue_range(uffd, msg->arg.pagefault.address, page_size);
stats->minor_faults++;
} else {
- /* Missing page faults */
+ /*
+ * Missing page faults.
+ *
+ * Here we force a write check for each of the missing mode
+ * faults. It's guaranteed because the only threads that
+ * will trigger uffd faults are the locking threads, and
+ * their first instruction to touch the missing page will
+ * always be pthread_mutex_lock().
+ *
+ * Note that here we relied on an NPTL glibc impl detail to
+ * always read the lock type at the entry of the lock op
+ * (pthread_mutex_t.__data.__type, offset 0x10) before
+ * doing any locking operations to guarantee that. It's
+ * actually not good to rely on this impl detail because
+ * logically a pthread-compatible lib can implement the
+ * locks without types and we can fail when linking with
+ * them. However since we used to find bugs with this
+ * strict check we still keep it around. Hopefully this
+ * could be a good hint when it fails again. If one day
+ * it'll break on some other impl of glibc we'll revisit.
+ */
if (msg->arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE)
err("unexpected write fault");