summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>2017-12-08 16:13:44 +0300
committerArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>2018-01-08 17:41:06 +0300
commit9a9b8b4b2271e763c1600311a3d4ecc2ac359b55 (patch)
treeab3a2dca1dc0e5af42f9473958aefd67463fb7d6 /tools/perf
parent13a70f350665580708ab11f725d3578eaacbf2d0 (diff)
downloadlinux-9a9b8b4b2271e763c1600311a3d4ecc2ac359b55.tar.xz
perf tools: Create function to perform multiple time range checking
Previous patch supports the multiple time range. For example, select the first and second 10% time slices. perf report --time 10%/1,10%/2 We need a function to check if a timestamp is in the ranges of [0, 10%) and [10%, 20%]. Note that it includes the last element in [10%, 20%] but it doesn't include the last element in [0, 10%). It's to avoid the overlap. This patch implments a new function perf_time__ranges_skip_sample for this checking. Change log: v4: Let perf_time__ranges_skip_sample be compatible with perf_time__skip_sample when only one time range. Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512738826-2628-5-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf')
-rw-r--r--tools/perf/util/time-utils.c28
-rw-r--r--tools/perf/util/time-utils.h3
2 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
index 61c46022de0b..3f7f18f06982 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
@@ -300,6 +300,34 @@ bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp)
return false;
}
+bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
+ int num, u64 timestamp)
+{
+ struct perf_time_interval *ptime;
+ int i;
+
+ if ((timestamp == 0) || (num == 0))
+ return false;
+
+ if (num == 1)
+ return perf_time__skip_sample(&ptime_buf[0], timestamp);
+
+ /*
+ * start/end of multiple time ranges must be valid.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+ ptime = &ptime_buf[i];
+
+ if (timestamp >= ptime->start &&
+ ((timestamp < ptime->end && i < num - 1) ||
+ (timestamp <= ptime->end && i == num - 1))) {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return (i == num) ? true : false;
+}
+
int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz)
{
u64 sec = timestamp / NSEC_PER_SEC;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
index 23087231785a..34d5eba26bf5 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ int perf_time__percent_parse_str(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf, int num,
bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp);
+bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf,
+ int num, u64 timestamp);
+
int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz);
int fetch_current_timestamp(char *buf, size_t sz);