diff options
| author | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> | 2022-05-24 14:09:42 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> | 2022-05-26 17:02:02 +0300 |
| commit | 8916d72554e5f06df5ba17bfabc87c7977294ba4 (patch) | |
| tree | 4c8fe52725421955c8aab4670e07a6ff15688c2e /tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c | |
| parent | 5c83eff38194ab2c69a7dc1a64a0a3683f0a3c3a (diff) | |
| download | linux-8916d72554e5f06df5ba17bfabc87c7977294ba4.tar.xz | |
perf build: Stop using __weak bpf_object__next_program() to handle older libbpf versions
By adding a feature test for bpf_object__next_program() and providing a fallback if
it isn't present in older versions of libbpf.
Committer testing:
$ rpm -q libbpf-devel
libbpf-devel-0.4.0-2.fc35.x86_64
$ make -C tools/perf LIBBPF_DYNAMIC=1 O=/tmp/build/perf install-bin
$ cat /tmp/build/perf/feature/test-libbpf-bpf_object__next_program.make.output
test-libbpf-bpf_object__next_program.c: In function ‘main’:
test-libbpf-bpf_object__next_program.c:6:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bpf_object__next_program’; did you mean ‘bpf_object__unpin_programs’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
6 | bpf_object__next_program(NULL /* obj */, NULL /* prev */);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| bpf_object__unpin_programs
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
$
$ objdump -dS /tmp/build/perf/perf | grep '<bpf_object__next_program>:' -A20
00000000005b2dc0 <bpf_object__next_program>:
{
5b2dc0: 55 push %rbp
5b2dc1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
5b2dc4: 48 83 ec 10 sub $0x10,%rsp
5b2dc8: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax
5b2dcf: 00 00
5b2dd1: 48 89 45 f8 mov %rax,-0x8(%rbp)
5b2dd5: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
return bpf_program__next(prev, obj);
5b2dd7: 48 8b 45 f8 mov -0x8(%rbp),%rax
5b2ddb: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax
5b2de2: 00 00
5b2de4: 75 0f jne 5b2df5 <bpf_object__next_program+0x35>
}
5b2de6: c9 leave
5b2de7: 49 89 f8 mov %rdi,%r8
5b2dea: 48 89 f7 mov %rsi,%rdi
return bpf_program__next(prev, obj);
5b2ded: 4c 89 c6 mov %r8,%rsi
5b2df0: e9 3b b4 e5 ff jmp 40e230 <bpf_program__next@plt>
$
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/YozLKby7ITEtchC9@krava
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c index 289bb55aede1..c68d88ca1ece 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ int bpf_prog_load(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, } #endif -struct bpf_program * __weak +#ifndef HAVE_LIBBPF_BPF_OBJECT__NEXT_PROGRAM +struct bpf_program * bpf_object__next_program(const struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prev) { #pragma GCC diagnostic push @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ bpf_object__next_program(const struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prev) return bpf_program__next(prev, obj); #pragma GCC diagnostic pop } +#endif struct bpf_map * __weak bpf_object__next_map(const struct bpf_object *obj, const struct bpf_map *prev) |