Merge git://git.infradead.org/users/eparis/selinux

Conflicts:
	security/selinux/hooks.c

Pull Eric's existing SELinux tree as there are a number of patches in
there that are not yet upstream.  There was some minor fixup needed to
resolve a conflict in security/selinux/hooks.c:selinux_set_mnt_opts()
between the labeled NFS patches and Eric's security_fs_use()
simplification patch.

1 files changed, 202 insertions, 251 deletions

diff --git a/security/selinux/xfrm.c b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
index d03081886214..425b9f91d755 100644
--- a/security/selinux/xfrm.c
+++ b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
 atomic_t selinux_xfrm_refcount = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
 
 /*
- * Returns true if an LSM/SELinux context
+ * Returns true if the context is an LSM/SELinux context.
  */
 static inline int selinux_authorizable_ctx(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
 {
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static inline int selinux_authorizable_ctx(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
 }
 
 /*
- * Returns true if the xfrm contains a security blob for SELinux
+ * Returns true if the xfrm contains a security blob for SELinux.
  */
 static inline int selinux_authorizable_xfrm(struct xfrm_state *x)
 {
@@ -74,48 +74,111 @@ static inline int selinux_authorizable_xfrm(struct xfrm_state *x)
 }
 
 /*
- * LSM hook implementation that authorizes that a flow can use
- * a xfrm policy rule.
+ * Allocates a xfrm_sec_state and populates it using the supplied security
+ * xfrm_user_sec_ctx context.
  */
-int selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx, u32 fl_secid, u8 dir)
+static int selinux_xfrm_alloc_user(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
+				   struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx)
 {
 	int rc;
-	u32 sel_sid;
+	const struct task_security_struct *tsec = current_security();
+	struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = NULL;
+	u32 str_len;
 
-	/* Context sid is either set to label or ANY_ASSOC */
-	if (ctx) {
-		if (!selinux_authorizable_ctx(ctx))
-			return -EINVAL;
-
-		sel_sid = ctx->ctx_sid;
-	} else
-		/*
-		 * All flows should be treated as polmatch'ing an
-		 * otherwise applicable "non-labeled" policy. This
-		 * would prevent inadvertent "leaks".
-		 */
-		return 0;
+	if (ctxp == NULL || uctx == NULL ||
+	    uctx->ctx_doi != XFRM_SC_DOI_LSM ||
+	    uctx->ctx_alg != XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
-	rc = avc_has_perm(fl_secid, sel_sid, SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
-			  ASSOCIATION__POLMATCH,
-			  NULL);
+	str_len = uctx->ctx_len;
+	if (str_len >= PAGE_SIZE)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (rc == -EACCES)
-		return -ESRCH;
+	ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx) + str_len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	ctx->ctx_doi = XFRM_SC_DOI_LSM;
+	ctx->ctx_alg = XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX;
+	ctx->ctx_len = str_len;
+	memcpy(ctx->ctx_str, &uctx[1], str_len);
+	ctx->ctx_str[str_len] = '\0';
+	rc = security_context_to_sid(ctx->ctx_str, str_len, &ctx->ctx_sid);
+	if (rc)
+		goto err;
+
+	rc = avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
+			  SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT, NULL);
+	if (rc)
+		goto err;
+
+	*ctxp = ctx;
+	atomic_inc(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
+	return 0;
+
+err:
+	kfree(ctx);
 	return rc;
 }
 
 /*
+ * Free the xfrm_sec_ctx structure.
+ */
+static void selinux_xfrm_free(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	if (!ctx)
+		return;
+
+	atomic_dec(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
+	kfree(ctx);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Authorize the deletion of a labeled SA or policy rule.
+ */
+static int selinux_xfrm_delete(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	const struct task_security_struct *tsec = current_security();
+
+	if (!ctx)
+		return 0;
+
+	return avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
+			    SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT,
+			    NULL);
+}
+
+/*
+ * LSM hook implementation that authorizes that a flow can use a xfrm policy
+ * rule.
+ */
+int selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx, u32 fl_secid, u8 dir)
+{
+	int rc;
+
+	/* All flows should be treated as polmatch'ing an otherwise applicable
+	 * "non-labeled" policy. This would prevent inadvertent "leaks". */
+	if (!ctx)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Context sid is either set to label or ANY_ASSOC */
+	if (!selinux_authorizable_ctx(ctx))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	rc = avc_has_perm(fl_secid, ctx->ctx_sid,
+			  SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__POLMATCH, NULL);
+	return (rc == -EACCES ? -ESRCH : rc);
+}
+
+/*
  * LSM hook implementation that authorizes that a state matches
  * the given policy, flow combo.
  */
-
-int selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_policy *xp,
-			const struct flowi *fl)
+int selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x,
+				      struct xfrm_policy *xp,
+				      const struct flowi *fl)
 {
 	u32 state_sid;
-	int rc;
 
 	if (!xp->security)
 		if (x->security)
@@ -138,187 +201,80 @@ int selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_policy *
 	if (fl->flowi_secid != state_sid)
 		return 0;
 
-	rc = avc_has_perm(fl->flowi_secid, state_sid, SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
-			  ASSOCIATION__SENDTO,
-			  NULL)? 0:1;
-
-	/*
-	 * We don't need a separate SA Vs. policy polmatch check
-	 * since the SA is now of the same label as the flow and
-	 * a flow Vs. policy polmatch check had already happened
-	 * in selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup() above.
-	 */
-
-	return rc;
+	/* We don't need a separate SA Vs. policy polmatch check since the SA
+	 * is now of the same label as the flow and a flow Vs. policy polmatch
+	 * check had already happened in selinux_xfrm_policy_lookup() above. */
+	return (avc_has_perm(fl->flowi_secid, state_sid,
+			    SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SENDTO,
+			    NULL) ? 0 : 1);
 }
 
 /*
  * LSM hook implementation that checks and/or returns the xfrm sid for the
  * incoming packet.
  */
-
 int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *sid, int ckall)
 {
+	u32 sid_session = SECSID_NULL;
 	struct sec_path *sp;
 
-	*sid = SECSID_NULL;
-
 	if (skb == NULL)
-		return 0;
+		goto out;
 
 	sp = skb->sp;
 	if (sp) {
-		int i, sid_set = 0;
+		int i;
 
-		for (i = sp->len-1; i >= 0; i--) {
+		for (i = sp->len - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
 			struct xfrm_state *x = sp->xvec[i];
 			if (selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x)) {
 				struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = x->security;
 
-				if (!sid_set) {
-					*sid = ctx->ctx_sid;
-					sid_set = 1;
-
+				if (sid_session == SECSID_NULL) {
+					sid_session = ctx->ctx_sid;
 					if (!ckall)
-						break;
-				} else if (*sid != ctx->ctx_sid)
+						goto out;
+				} else if (sid_session != ctx->ctx_sid) {
+					*sid = SECSID_NULL;
 					return -EINVAL;
+				}
 			}
 		}
 	}
 
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * Security blob allocation for xfrm_policy and xfrm_state
- * CTX does not have a meaningful value on input
- */
-static int selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
-	struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx, u32 sid)
-{
-	int rc = 0;
-	const struct task_security_struct *tsec = current_security();
-	struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = NULL;
-	char *ctx_str = NULL;
-	u32 str_len;
-
-	BUG_ON(uctx && sid);
-
-	if (!uctx)
-		goto not_from_user;
-
-	if (uctx->ctx_alg != XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	str_len = uctx->ctx_len;
-	if (str_len >= PAGE_SIZE)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	*ctxp = ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx) +
-			      str_len + 1,
-			      GFP_KERNEL);
-
-	if (!ctx)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	ctx->ctx_doi = uctx->ctx_doi;
-	ctx->ctx_len = str_len;
-	ctx->ctx_alg = uctx->ctx_alg;
-
-	memcpy(ctx->ctx_str,
-	       uctx+1,
-	       str_len);
-	ctx->ctx_str[str_len] = 0;
-	rc = security_context_to_sid(ctx->ctx_str,
-				     str_len,
-				     &ctx->ctx_sid);
-
-	if (rc)
-		goto out;
-
-	/*
-	 * Does the subject have permission to set security context?
-	 */
-	rc = avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
-			  SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
-			  ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT, NULL);
-	if (rc)
-		goto out;
-
-	return rc;
-
-not_from_user:
-	rc = security_sid_to_context(sid, &ctx_str, &str_len);
-	if (rc)
-		goto out;
-
-	*ctxp = ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx) +
-			      str_len,
-			      GFP_ATOMIC);
-
-	if (!ctx) {
-		rc = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	ctx->ctx_doi = XFRM_SC_DOI_LSM;
-	ctx->ctx_alg = XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX;
-	ctx->ctx_sid = sid;
-	ctx->ctx_len = str_len;
-	memcpy(ctx->ctx_str,
-	       ctx_str,
-	       str_len);
-
-	goto out2;
-
 out:
-	*ctxp = NULL;
-	kfree(ctx);
-out2:
-	kfree(ctx_str);
-	return rc;
+	*sid = sid_session;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
- * LSM hook implementation that allocs and transfers uctx spec to
- * xfrm_policy.
+ * LSM hook implementation that allocs and transfers uctx spec to xfrm_policy.
  */
 int selinux_xfrm_policy_alloc(struct xfrm_sec_ctx **ctxp,
 			      struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx)
 {
-	int err;
-
-	BUG_ON(!uctx);
-
-	err = selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(ctxp, uctx, 0);
-	if (err == 0)
-		atomic_inc(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
-
-	return err;
+	return selinux_xfrm_alloc_user(ctxp, uctx);
 }
 
-
 /*
- * LSM hook implementation that copies security data structure from old to
- * new for policy cloning.
+ * LSM hook implementation that copies security data structure from old to new
+ * for policy cloning.
  */
 int selinux_xfrm_policy_clone(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *old_ctx,
 			      struct xfrm_sec_ctx **new_ctxp)
 {
 	struct xfrm_sec_ctx *new_ctx;
 
-	if (old_ctx) {
-		new_ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*old_ctx) + old_ctx->ctx_len,
-				  GFP_ATOMIC);
-		if (!new_ctx)
-			return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!old_ctx)
+		return 0;
+
+	new_ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*old_ctx) + old_ctx->ctx_len, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!new_ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	memcpy(new_ctx, old_ctx, sizeof(*old_ctx) + old_ctx->ctx_len);
+	atomic_inc(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
+	*new_ctxp = new_ctx;
 
-		memcpy(new_ctx, old_ctx, sizeof(*new_ctx));
-		memcpy(new_ctx->ctx_str, old_ctx->ctx_str, new_ctx->ctx_len);
-		atomic_inc(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
-		*new_ctxp = new_ctx;
-	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -327,8 +283,7 @@ int selinux_xfrm_policy_clone(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *old_ctx,
  */
 void selinux_xfrm_policy_free(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	atomic_dec(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
-	kfree(ctx);
+	selinux_xfrm_free(ctx);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -336,31 +291,55 @@ void selinux_xfrm_policy_free(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
  */
 int selinux_xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	const struct task_security_struct *tsec = current_security();
-
-	if (!ctx)
-		return 0;
+	return selinux_xfrm_delete(ctx);
+}
 
-	return avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
-			    SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT,
-			    NULL);
+/*
+ * LSM hook implementation that allocates a xfrm_sec_state, populates it using
+ * the supplied security context, and assigns it to the xfrm_state.
+ */
+int selinux_xfrm_state_alloc(struct xfrm_state *x,
+			     struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx)
+{
+	return selinux_xfrm_alloc_user(&x->security, uctx);
 }
 
 /*
- * LSM hook implementation that allocs and transfers sec_ctx spec to
- * xfrm_state.
+ * LSM hook implementation that allocates a xfrm_sec_state and populates based
+ * on a secid.
  */
-int selinux_xfrm_state_alloc(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx,
-		u32 secid)
+int selinux_xfrm_state_alloc_acquire(struct xfrm_state *x,
+				     struct xfrm_sec_ctx *polsec, u32 secid)
 {
-	int err;
+	int rc;
+	struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx;
+	char *ctx_str = NULL;
+	int str_len;
+
+	if (!polsec)
+		return 0;
 
-	BUG_ON(!x);
+	if (secid == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
-	err = selinux_xfrm_sec_ctx_alloc(&x->security, uctx, secid);
-	if (err == 0)
-		atomic_inc(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
-	return err;
+	rc = security_sid_to_context(secid, &ctx_str, &str_len);
+	if (rc)
+		return rc;
+
+	ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx) + str_len, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ctx->ctx_doi = XFRM_SC_DOI_LSM;
+	ctx->ctx_alg = XFRM_SC_ALG_SELINUX;
+	ctx->ctx_sid = secid;
+	ctx->ctx_len = str_len;
+	memcpy(ctx->ctx_str, ctx_str, str_len);
+	kfree(ctx_str);
+
+	x->security = ctx;
+	atomic_inc(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -368,24 +347,15 @@ int selinux_xfrm_state_alloc(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uct
  */
 void selinux_xfrm_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x)
 {
-	atomic_dec(&selinux_xfrm_refcount);
-	kfree(x->security);
+	selinux_xfrm_free(x->security);
 }
 
- /*
-  * LSM hook implementation that authorizes deletion of labeled SAs.
-  */
+/*
+ * LSM hook implementation that authorizes deletion of labeled SAs.
+ */
 int selinux_xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
 {
-	const struct task_security_struct *tsec = current_security();
-	struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = x->security;
-
-	if (!ctx)
-		return 0;
-
-	return avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, ctx->ctx_sid,
-			    SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SETCONTEXT,
-			    NULL);
+	return selinux_xfrm_delete(x->security);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -395,14 +365,12 @@ int selinux_xfrm_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x)
  * we need to check for unlabelled access since this may not have
  * gone thru the IPSec process.
  */
-int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
-				struct common_audit_data *ad)
+int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
+			      struct common_audit_data *ad)
 {
-	int i, rc = 0;
-	struct sec_path *sp;
-	u32 sel_sid = SECINITSID_UNLABELED;
-
-	sp = skb->sp;
+	int i;
+	struct sec_path *sp = skb->sp;
+	u32 peer_sid = SECINITSID_UNLABELED;
 
 	if (sp) {
 		for (i = 0; i < sp->len; i++) {
@@ -410,23 +378,17 @@ int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 			if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x)) {
 				struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = x->security;
-				sel_sid = ctx->ctx_sid;
+				peer_sid = ctx->ctx_sid;
 				break;
 			}
 		}
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * This check even when there's no association involved is
-	 * intended, according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a
-	 * process can't engage in non-ipsec communication unless
-	 * explicitly allowed by policy.
-	 */
-
-	rc = avc_has_perm(isec_sid, sel_sid, SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
-			  ASSOCIATION__RECVFROM, ad);
-
-	return rc;
+	/* This check even when there's no association involved is intended,
+	 * according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a process can't engage in
+	 * non-IPsec communication unless explicitly allowed by policy. */
+	return avc_has_perm(sk_sid, peer_sid,
+			    SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__RECVFROM, ad);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -436,49 +398,38 @@ int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
  * If we do have a authorizable security association, then it has already been
  * checked in the selinux_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match hook above.
  */
-int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 isec_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
-					struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto)
+int selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(u32 sk_sid, struct sk_buff *skb,
+				struct common_audit_data *ad, u8 proto)
 {
 	struct dst_entry *dst;
-	int rc = 0;
-
-	dst = skb_dst(skb);
-
-	if (dst) {
-		struct dst_entry *dst_test;
-
-		for (dst_test = dst; dst_test != NULL;
-		     dst_test = dst_test->child) {
-			struct xfrm_state *x = dst_test->xfrm;
-
-			if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
-				goto out;
-		}
-	}
 
 	switch (proto) {
 	case IPPROTO_AH:
 	case IPPROTO_ESP:
 	case IPPROTO_COMP:
-		/*
-		 * We should have already seen this packet once before
-		 * it underwent xfrm(s). No need to subject it to the
-		 * unlabeled check.
-		 */
-		goto out;
+		/* We should have already seen this packet once before it
+		 * underwent xfrm(s). No need to subject it to the unlabeled
+		 * check. */
+		return 0;
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * This check even when there's no association involved is
-	 * intended, according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a
-	 * process can't engage in non-ipsec communication unless
-	 * explicitly allowed by policy.
-	 */
+	dst = skb_dst(skb);
+	if (dst) {
+		struct dst_entry *iter;
 
-	rc = avc_has_perm(isec_sid, SECINITSID_UNLABELED, SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION,
-			  ASSOCIATION__SENDTO, ad);
-out:
-	return rc;
+		for (iter = dst; iter != NULL; iter = iter->child) {
+			struct xfrm_state *x = iter->xfrm;
+
+			if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
+				return 0;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* This check even when there's no association involved is intended,
+	 * according to Trent Jaeger, to make sure a process can't engage in
+	 * non-IPsec communication unless explicitly allowed by policy. */
+	return avc_has_perm(sk_sid, SECINITSID_UNLABELED,
+			    SECCLASS_ASSOCIATION, ASSOCIATION__SENDTO, ad);
 }