diff options
author | Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> | 2021-01-15 07:46:52 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> | 2021-01-15 07:54:11 +0300 |
commit | e58bb688f2e44237990dfb68ea8cb2449efde7da (patch) | |
tree | efa3f41a96dfdc7410912f3032211852ccbcdfbc /security/integrity | |
parent | ccf11dbaa07b328fa469415c362d33459c140a37 (diff) | |
parent | fdd1ffe8a812b1109388e4bc389e57b2695ad095 (diff) | |
download | linux-e58bb688f2e44237990dfb68ea8cb2449efde7da.tar.xz |
Merge branch 'measure-critical-data' into next-integrity
From "IMA: support for measuring kernel integrity critical data"
coverletter.
IMA measures files and buffer data such as keys, command-line arguments
passed to the kernel on kexec system call, etc. While these measurements
are necessary for monitoring and validating the integrity of the system,
they are not sufficient. Various data structures, policies, and states
stored in kernel memory also impact the integrity of the system.
Several kernel subsystems contain such integrity critical data -
e.g. LSMs like SELinux, AppArmor etc. or device-mapper targets like
dm-crypt, dm-verity, dm-integrity etc. These kernel subsystems help
protect the integrity of a system. Their integrity critical data is not
expected to change frequently during run-time. Some of these structures
cannot be defined as __ro_after_init, because they are initialized later.
For a given system, various external services/infrastructure tools
(including the attestation service) interact with it - both during the
setup and during rest of the system run-time. They share sensitive data
and/or execute critical workload on that system. The external services
may want to verify the current run-time state of the relevant kernel
subsystems before fully trusting the system with business critical
data/workload. For instance, verifying that SELinux is in "enforce" mode
along with the expected policy, disks are encrypted with a certain
configuration, secure boot is enabled etc.
This series provides the necessary IMA functionality for kernel
subsystems to ensure their configuration can be measured:
- by kernel subsystems themselves,
- in a tamper resistant way,
- and re-measured - triggered on state/configuration change.
This patch set:
- defines a new IMA hook ima_measure_critical_data() to measure
integrity critical data,
- limits the critical data being measured based on a label,
- defines a builtin critical data measurement policy,
- and includes an SELinux consumer of the new IMA critical data hook.
Diffstat (limited to 'security/integrity')
-rw-r--r-- | security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 59 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 115 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c | 3 |
7 files changed, 159 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 8e8b1e3cb847..aa312472c7c5 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ static inline unsigned int ima_hash_key(u8 *digest) hook(POLICY_CHECK, policy) \ hook(KEXEC_CMDLINE, kexec_cmdline) \ hook(KEY_CHECK, key) \ + hook(CRITICAL_DATA, critical_data) \ hook(MAX_CHECK, none) #define __ima_hook_enumify(ENUM, str) ENUM, @@ -256,7 +257,7 @@ static inline void ima_process_queued_keys(void) {} int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, - const char *keyring); + const char *func_data); int ima_must_measure(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func); int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, @@ -268,7 +269,8 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, struct ima_template_desc *template_desc); void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, - int pcr, const char *keyring); + int pcr, const char *func_data, + bool buf_hash); void ima_audit_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, const unsigned char *filename); int ima_alloc_init_template(struct ima_event_data *event_data, @@ -284,7 +286,7 @@ const char *ima_d_path(const struct path *path, char **pathbuf, char *filename); int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, - const char *keyring); + const char *func_data); void ima_init_policy(void); void ima_update_policy(void); void ima_update_policy_flag(void); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index 4f39fb93f278..1dd70dc68ffd 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -170,13 +170,13 @@ err_out: * @func: caller identifier * @pcr: pointer filled in if matched measure policy sets pcr= * @template_desc: pointer filled in if matched measure policy sets template= - * @keyring: keyring name used to determine the action + * @func_data: func specific data, may be NULL * * The policy is defined in terms of keypairs: * subj=, obj=, type=, func=, mask=, fsmagic= * subj,obj, and type: are LSM specific. * func: FILE_CHECK | BPRM_CHECK | CREDS_CHECK | MMAP_CHECK | MODULE_CHECK - * | KEXEC_CMDLINE | KEY_CHECK + * | KEXEC_CMDLINE | KEY_CHECK | CRITICAL_DATA * mask: contains the permission mask * fsmagic: hex value * @@ -186,14 +186,14 @@ err_out: int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, - const char *keyring) + const char *func_data) { int flags = IMA_MEASURE | IMA_AUDIT | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH; flags &= ima_policy_flag; return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, secid, func, mask, flags, pcr, - template_desc, keyring); + template_desc, func_data); } /* diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 8361941ee0a1..46ffa38bab12 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ int ima_check_blacklist(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, if ((rc == -EPERM) && (iint->flags & IMA_MEASURE)) process_buffer_measurement(NULL, digest, digestsize, "blacklisted-hash", NONE, - pcr, NULL); + pcr, NULL, false); } return rc; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c index 1c68c500c26f..a74095793936 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c @@ -60,5 +60,5 @@ void ima_post_key_create_or_update(struct key *keyring, struct key *key, */ process_buffer_measurement(NULL, payload, payload_len, keyring->description, KEY_CHECK, 0, - keyring->description); + keyring->description, false); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index f87cb29329e9..6a429846f90a 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -809,20 +809,22 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size, } /* - * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer to ima log. + * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer or the buffer data hash * @inode: inode associated with the object being measured (NULL for KEY_CHECK) * @buf: pointer to the buffer that needs to be added to the log. * @size: size of buffer(in bytes). * @eventname: event name to be used for the buffer entry. * @func: IMA hook * @pcr: pcr to extend the measurement - * @keyring: keyring name to determine the action to be performed + * @func_data: func specific data, may be NULL + * @buf_hash: measure buffer data hash * - * Based on policy, the buffer is measured into the ima log. + * Based on policy, either the buffer data or buffer data hash is measured */ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, - int pcr, const char *keyring) + int pcr, const char *func_data, + bool buf_hash) { int ret = 0; const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM"; @@ -837,6 +839,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, struct ima_digest_data hdr; char digest[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE]; } hash = {}; + char digest_hash[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE]; + int digest_hash_len = hash_digest_size[ima_hash_algo]; int violation = 0; int action = 0; u32 secid; @@ -861,7 +865,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, if (func) { security_task_getsecid(current, &secid); action = ima_get_action(inode, current_cred(), secid, 0, func, - &pcr, &template, keyring); + &pcr, &template, func_data); if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) return; } @@ -879,13 +883,27 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, goto out; } + if (buf_hash) { + memcpy(digest_hash, hash.hdr.digest, digest_hash_len); + + ret = ima_calc_buffer_hash(digest_hash, digest_hash_len, + iint.ima_hash); + if (ret < 0) { + audit_cause = "hashing_error"; + goto out; + } + + event_data.buf = digest_hash; + event_data.buf_len = digest_hash_len; + } + ret = ima_alloc_init_template(&event_data, &entry, template); if (ret < 0) { audit_cause = "alloc_entry"; goto out; } - ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, buf, pcr); + ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, event_data.buf, pcr); if (ret < 0) { audit_cause = "store_entry"; ima_free_template_entry(entry); @@ -920,10 +938,37 @@ void ima_kexec_cmdline(int kernel_fd, const void *buf, int size) return; process_buffer_measurement(file_inode(f.file), buf, size, - "kexec-cmdline", KEXEC_CMDLINE, 0, NULL); + "kexec-cmdline", KEXEC_CMDLINE, 0, NULL, + false); fdput(f); } +/** + * ima_measure_critical_data - measure kernel integrity critical data + * @event_label: unique event label for grouping and limiting critical data + * @event_name: event name for the record in the IMA measurement list + * @buf: pointer to buffer data + * @buf_len: length of buffer data (in bytes) + * @hash: measure buffer data hash + * + * Measure data critical to the integrity of the kernel into the IMA log + * and extend the pcr. Examples of critical data could be various data + * structures, policies, and states stored in kernel memory that can + * impact the integrity of the system. + */ +void ima_measure_critical_data(const char *event_label, + const char *event_name, + const void *buf, size_t buf_len, + bool hash) +{ + if (!event_name || !event_label || !buf || !buf_len) + return; + + process_buffer_measurement(NULL, buf, buf_len, event_name, + CRITICAL_DATA, 0, event_label, + hash); +} + static int __init init_ima(void) { int error; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 823a0c1379cb..9b45d064a87d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ #define IMA_PCR 0x0100 #define IMA_FSNAME 0x0200 #define IMA_KEYRINGS 0x0400 +#define IMA_LABEL 0x0800 #define UNKNOWN 0 #define MEASURE 0x0001 /* same as IMA_MEASURE */ @@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry { } lsm[MAX_LSM_RULES]; char *fsname; struct ima_rule_opt_list *keyrings; /* Measure keys added to these keyrings */ + struct ima_rule_opt_list *label; /* Measure data grouped under this label */ struct ima_template_desc *template; }; @@ -204,6 +206,10 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = { .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED}, }; +static struct ima_rule_entry critical_data_rules[] __ro_after_init = { + {.action = MEASURE, .func = CRITICAL_DATA, .flags = IMA_FUNC}, +}; + /* An array of architecture specific rules */ static struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init; @@ -226,6 +232,7 @@ __setup("ima_tcb", default_measure_policy_setup); static bool ima_use_appraise_tcb __initdata; static bool ima_use_secure_boot __initdata; +static bool ima_use_critical_data __initdata; static bool ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs __ro_after_init; static int __init policy_setup(char *str) { @@ -240,6 +247,8 @@ static int __init policy_setup(char *str) ima_use_appraise_tcb = true; else if (strcmp(p, "secure_boot") == 0) ima_use_secure_boot = true; + else if (strcmp(p, "critical_data") == 0) + ima_use_critical_data = true; else if (strcmp(p, "fail_securely") == 0) ima_fail_unverifiable_sigs = true; else @@ -453,30 +462,46 @@ int ima_lsm_policy_change(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, } /** - * ima_match_keyring - determine whether the keyring matches the measure rule + * ima_match_rule_data - determine whether func_data matches the policy rule * @rule: a pointer to a rule - * @keyring: name of the keyring to match against the measure rule + * @func_data: data to match against the measure rule data * @cred: a pointer to a credentials structure for user validation * - * Returns true if keyring matches one in the rule, false otherwise. + * Returns true if func_data matches one in the rule, false otherwise. */ -static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, - const char *keyring, const struct cred *cred) +static bool ima_match_rule_data(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, + const char *func_data, + const struct cred *cred) { + const struct ima_rule_opt_list *opt_list = NULL; bool matched = false; size_t i; if ((rule->flags & IMA_UID) && !rule->uid_op(cred->uid, rule->uid)) return false; - if (!rule->keyrings) - return true; + switch (rule->func) { + case KEY_CHECK: + if (!rule->keyrings) + return true; + + opt_list = rule->keyrings; + break; + case CRITICAL_DATA: + if (!rule->label) + return true; + + opt_list = rule->label; + break; + default: + return false; + } - if (!keyring) + if (!func_data) return false; - for (i = 0; i < rule->keyrings->count; i++) { - if (!strcmp(rule->keyrings->items[i], keyring)) { + for (i = 0; i < opt_list->count; i++) { + if (!strcmp(opt_list->items[i], func_data)) { matched = true; break; } @@ -493,24 +518,30 @@ static bool ima_match_keyring(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, * @secid: the secid of the task to be validated * @func: LIM hook identifier * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC) - * @keyring: keyring name to check in policy for KEY_CHECK func + * @func_data: func specific data, may be NULL * * Returns true on rule match, false on failure. */ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, - const char *keyring) + const char *func_data) { int i; - if (func == KEY_CHECK) { - return (rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) && (rule->func == func) && - ima_match_keyring(rule, keyring, cred); - } if ((rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) && (rule->func != func && func != POST_SETATTR)) return false; + + switch (func) { + case KEY_CHECK: + case CRITICAL_DATA: + return ((rule->func == func) && + ima_match_rule_data(rule, func_data, cred)); + default: + break; + } + if ((rule->flags & IMA_MASK) && (rule->mask != mask && func != POST_SETATTR)) return false; @@ -610,8 +641,7 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC) * @pcr: set the pcr to extend * @template_desc: the template that should be used for this rule - * @keyring: the keyring name, if given, to be used to check in the policy. - * keyring can be NULL if func is anything other than KEY_CHECK. + * @func_data: func specific data, may be NULL * * Measure decision based on func/mask/fsmagic and LSM(subj/obj/type) * conditions. @@ -623,7 +653,7 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc, - const char *keyring) + const char *func_data) { struct ima_rule_entry *entry; int action = 0, actmask = flags | (flags << 1); @@ -638,7 +668,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, continue; if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, secid, func, mask, - keyring)) + func_data)) continue; action |= entry->flags & IMA_ACTION_FLAGS; @@ -848,6 +878,11 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) ARRAY_SIZE(default_appraise_rules), IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); + if (ima_use_critical_data) + add_rules(critical_data_rules, + ARRAY_SIZE(critical_data_rules), + IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); + ima_update_policy_flag(); } @@ -907,7 +942,7 @@ enum { Opt_uid_lt, Opt_euid_lt, Opt_fowner_lt, Opt_appraise_type, Opt_appraise_flag, Opt_permit_directio, Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_keyrings, - Opt_err + Opt_label, Opt_err }; static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { @@ -944,6 +979,7 @@ static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { {Opt_pcr, "pcr=%s"}, {Opt_template, "template=%s"}, {Opt_keyrings, "keyrings=%s"}, + {Opt_label, "label=%s"}, {Opt_err, NULL} }; @@ -1107,6 +1143,18 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) return false; break; + case CRITICAL_DATA: + if (entry->action & ~(MEASURE | DONT_MEASURE)) + return false; + + if (entry->flags & ~(IMA_FUNC | IMA_UID | IMA_PCR | + IMA_LABEL)) + return false; + + if (ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(entry)) + return false; + + break; default: return false; } @@ -1238,6 +1286,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS) && strcmp(args[0].from, "KEY_CHECK") == 0) entry->func = KEY_CHECK; + else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "CRITICAL_DATA") == 0) + entry->func = CRITICAL_DATA; else result = -EINVAL; if (!result) @@ -1308,6 +1358,23 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) entry->flags |= IMA_KEYRINGS; break; + case Opt_label: + ima_log_string(ab, "label", args[0].from); + + if (entry->label) { + result = -EINVAL; + break; + } + + entry->label = ima_alloc_rule_opt_list(args); + if (IS_ERR(entry->label)) { + result = PTR_ERR(entry->label); + entry->label = NULL; + break; + } + + entry->flags |= IMA_LABEL; + break; case Opt_fsuuid: ima_log_string(ab, "fsuuid", args[0].from); @@ -1688,6 +1755,12 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_puts(m, " "); } + if (entry->flags & IMA_LABEL) { + seq_puts(m, "label="); + ima_show_rule_opt_list(m, entry->label); + seq_puts(m, " "); + } + if (entry->flags & IMA_PCR) { snprintf(tbuf, sizeof(tbuf), "%d", entry->pcr); seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_pcr), tbuf); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c index 69a8626a35c0..c2f2ad34f9b7 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c @@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ void ima_process_queued_keys(void) entry->payload_len, entry->keyring_name, KEY_CHECK, 0, - entry->keyring_name); + entry->keyring_name, + false); list_del(&entry->list); ima_free_key_entry(entry); } |