diff options
author | Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> | 2021-11-08 14:42:20 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> | 2022-01-05 21:06:26 +0300 |
commit | e232333be69ee9ccd4281032af0d2416940cb98d (patch) | |
tree | 54d3becb19288292ee27d69ba4ba6ef4a2341196 /scripts | |
parent | fa55b7dcdc43c1aa1ba12bca9d2dd4318c2a0dbf (diff) | |
download | linux-e232333be69ee9ccd4281032af0d2416940cb98d.tar.xz |
scripts/sorttable: Unify arm64 & x86 sort functions
The format of the arm64 and x86 exception table entries is essentially
the same as of commits:
46d28947d9876fc0 ("x86/extable: Rework the exception table mechanics")
d6e2cc5647753825 ("arm64: extable: add `type` and `data` fields")
Both use a 12-byte entry consisting of two 32-bit relative offsets and
32 bits of (absolute) data, and their sort functions are identical aside
from commentary, with arm64 saying:
/* Don't touch the fixup type or data */
... and x86 saying:
/* Don't touch the fixup type */
Unify the two behind a common sort_relative_table_with_data() function,
retaining the arm64 commentary.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
-rw-r--r-- | scripts/sorttable.c | 36 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/sorttable.c b/scripts/sorttable.c index b7c2ad71f9cf..ca9db62bf766 100644 --- a/scripts/sorttable.c +++ b/scripts/sorttable.c @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size) } } -static void arm64_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size) +static void sort_relative_table_with_data(char *extab_image, int image_size) { int i = 0; @@ -259,34 +259,6 @@ static void arm64_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size) } } -static void x86_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size) -{ - int i = 0; - - while (i < image_size) { - uint32_t *loc = (uint32_t *)(extab_image + i); - - w(r(loc) + i, loc); - w(r(loc + 1) + i + 4, loc + 1); - /* Don't touch the fixup type */ - - i += sizeof(uint32_t) * 3; - } - - qsort(extab_image, image_size / 12, 12, compare_relative_table); - - i = 0; - while (i < image_size) { - uint32_t *loc = (uint32_t *)(extab_image + i); - - w(r(loc) - i, loc); - w(r(loc + 1) - (i + 4), loc + 1); - /* Don't touch the fixup type */ - - i += sizeof(uint32_t) * 3; - } -} - static void s390_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size) { int i; @@ -364,15 +336,13 @@ static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr) switch (r2(&ehdr->e_machine)) { case EM_386: + case EM_AARCH64: case EM_X86_64: - custom_sort = x86_sort_relative_table; + custom_sort = sort_relative_table_with_data; break; case EM_S390: custom_sort = s390_sort_relative_table; break; - case EM_AARCH64: - custom_sort = arm64_sort_relative_table; - break; case EM_PARISC: case EM_PPC: case EM_PPC64: |