summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/sunrpc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-03-09 21:24:42 +0300
committerTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>2020-03-16 17:16:26 +0300
commit5601cda82b0cc88c7d87b612c8b8b920de801be3 (patch)
tree3f8b817a41ca72cdb6cc76b433393794d15c58d8 /net/sunrpc
parentf5fdf1243fb750598b46305dd03c553949cfa14f (diff)
downloadlinux-5601cda82b0cc88c7d87b612c8b8b920de801be3.tar.xz
nfs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sunrpc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions