diff options
author | NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> | 2013-06-13 06:53:42 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> | 2013-07-02 01:42:53 +0400 |
commit | f9e1aedc6c79f18bb56caa3735b94217c4ec1e0c (patch) | |
tree | 41ccb179f3d71ded6d035f3bc292f752c32f6995 /net/sunrpc/cache.c | |
parent | d08d32e6e5c0fee127d3b20d70f5b59d8af0a261 (diff) | |
download | linux-f9e1aedc6c79f18bb56caa3735b94217c4ec1e0c.tar.xz |
sunrpc/cache: remove races with queuing an upcall.
We currently queue an upcall after setting CACHE_PENDING,
and dequeue after clearing CACHE_PENDING.
So a request should only be present when CACHE_PENDING is set.
However we don't combine the test and the enqueue/dequeue in
a protected region, so it is possible (if unlikely) for a race
to result in a request being queued without CACHE_PENDING set,
or a request to be absent despite CACHE_PENDING.
So: include a test for CACHE_PENDING inside the regions of
enqueue and dequeue where queue_lock is held, and abort
the operation if the value is not as expected.
Also remove the early 'return' from cache_dequeue() to ensure that it
always removes all entries: As there is no locking between setting
CACHE_PENDING and calling sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall it is not
inconceivable for some other thread to clear CACHE_PENDING and then
someone else to set it and call sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall, both before
the original threads completed the call.
With this, it perfectly safe and correct to:
- call cache_dequeue() if and only if we have just
cleared CACHE_PENDING
- call sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall() (via cache_make_upcall)
if and only if we have just set CACHE_PENDING.
Reported-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sunrpc/cache.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/sunrpc/cache.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c index 3b3f14fc02c5..8e964ae8d7b5 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c @@ -1036,23 +1036,32 @@ static int cache_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch) { - struct cache_queue *cq; + struct cache_queue *cq, *tmp; + struct cache_request *cr; + struct list_head dequeued; + + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dequeued); spin_lock(&queue_lock); - list_for_each_entry(cq, &detail->queue, list) + list_for_each_entry_safe(cq, tmp, &detail->queue, list) if (!cq->reader) { - struct cache_request *cr = container_of(cq, struct cache_request, q); + cr = container_of(cq, struct cache_request, q); if (cr->item != ch) continue; + if (test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &ch->flags)) + /* Lost a race and it is pending again */ + break; if (cr->readers != 0) continue; - list_del(&cr->q.list); - spin_unlock(&queue_lock); - cache_put(cr->item, detail); - kfree(cr->buf); - kfree(cr); - return; + list_move(&cr->q.list, &dequeued); } spin_unlock(&queue_lock); + while (!list_empty(&dequeued)) { + cr = list_entry(dequeued.next, struct cache_request, q.list); + list_del(&cr->q.list); + cache_put(cr->item, detail); + kfree(cr->buf); + kfree(cr); + } } /* @@ -1166,6 +1175,7 @@ int sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *h) char *buf; struct cache_request *crq; + int ret = 0; if (!detail->cache_request) return -EINVAL; @@ -1191,10 +1201,18 @@ int sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *h) crq->len = 0; crq->readers = 0; spin_lock(&queue_lock); - list_add_tail(&crq->q.list, &detail->queue); + if (test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &h->flags)) + list_add_tail(&crq->q.list, &detail->queue); + else + /* Lost a race, no longer PENDING, so don't enqueue */ + ret = -EAGAIN; spin_unlock(&queue_lock); wake_up(&queue_wait); - return 0; + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { + kfree(buf); + kfree(crq); + } + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall); |