diff options
| author | Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> | 2021-04-16 17:16:06 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2021-04-17 01:40:59 +0300 |
| commit | aa8caa767e319bad34a82bfce7da1ed2b9c0ed6f (patch) | |
| tree | e48e741ac1e1ca2068280f0e28d3a90489453b22 /net/ipv6/addrconf.c | |
| parent | d8214c7aae6166137a2509053e793434e8dfb2c5 (diff) | |
| download | linux-aa8caa767e319bad34a82bfce7da1ed2b9c0ed6f.tar.xz | |
mld: fix suspicious RCU usage in __ipv6_dev_mc_dec()
__ipv6_dev_mc_dec() internally uses sleepable functions so that caller
must not acquire atomic locks. But caller, which is addrconf_verify_rtnl()
acquires rcu_read_lock_bh().
So this warning occurs in the __ipv6_dev_mc_dec().
Test commands:
ip netns add A
ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
ip link set veth1 netns A
ip link set veth0 up
ip netns exec A ip link set veth1 up
ip a a 2001:db8::1/64 dev veth0 valid_lft 2 preferred_lft 1
Splat looks like:
============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.12.0-rc6+ #515 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kernel/sched/core.c:8294 Illegal context switch in RCU-bh read-side
critical section!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
4 locks held by kworker/4:0/1997:
#0: ffff88810bd72d48 ((wq_completion)ipv6_addrconf){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x761/0x1440
#1: ffff888105c8fe00 ((addr_chk_work).work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x795/0x1440
#2: ffffffffb9279fb0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
addrconf_verify_work+0xa/0x20
#3: ffffffffb8e30860 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at:
addrconf_verify_rtnl+0x23/0xc60
stack backtrace:
CPU: 4 PID: 1997 Comm: kworker/4:0 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc6+ #515
Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_verify_work
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xa4/0xe5
___might_sleep+0x27d/0x2b0
__mutex_lock+0xc8/0x13f0
? lock_downgrade+0x690/0x690
? __ipv6_dev_mc_dec+0x49/0x2a0
? mark_held_locks+0xb7/0x120
? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1270/0x1270
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x12c/0x3e0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x50
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x41/0x120
? __wake_up_common_lock+0xc9/0x100
? __wake_up_common+0x620/0x620
? memset+0x1f/0x40
? netlink_broadcast_filtered+0x2c4/0xa70
? __ipv6_dev_mc_dec+0x49/0x2a0
__ipv6_dev_mc_dec+0x49/0x2a0
? netlink_broadcast_filtered+0x2f6/0xa70
addrconf_leave_solict.part.64+0xad/0xf0
? addrconf_join_solict.part.63+0xf0/0xf0
? nlmsg_notify+0x63/0x1b0
__ipv6_ifa_notify+0x22c/0x9c0
? inet6_fill_ifaddr+0xbe0/0xbe0
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x12c/0x3e0
? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0
? ipv6_del_addr+0x347/0x870
ipv6_del_addr+0x3b1/0x870
? addrconf_ifdown+0xfe0/0xfe0
? rcu_read_lock_any_held.part.27+0x20/0x20
addrconf_verify_rtnl+0x8a9/0xc60
addrconf_verify_work+0xf/0x20
process_one_work+0x84c/0x1440
In order to avoid this problem, it uses rcu_read_unlock_bh() for
a short time. RCU is used for avoiding freeing
ifp(struct *inet6_ifaddr) while ifp is being used. But this will
not be released even if rcu_read_unlock_bh() is used.
Because before rcu_read_unlock_bh(), it uses in6_ifa_hold(ifp).
So this is safe.
Fixes: 63ed8de4be81 ("mld: add mc_lock for protecting per-interface mld data")
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv6/addrconf.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c index dbb5bb9269bb..b0ef65eb9bd2 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c @@ -4485,7 +4485,9 @@ restart: age >= ifp->valid_lft) { spin_unlock(&ifp->lock); in6_ifa_hold(ifp); + rcu_read_unlock_bh(); ipv6_del_addr(ifp); + rcu_read_lock_bh(); goto restart; } else if (ifp->prefered_lft == INFINITY_LIFE_TIME) { spin_unlock(&ifp->lock); |