diff options
author | Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> | 2014-10-02 11:16:22 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> | 2014-10-02 12:37:07 +0400 |
commit | 02e246aee868e982eecc25ee97d02acf2c2b8884 (patch) | |
tree | 9616f22ee9a75d0b0c85eb984da3154e3a17a3f7 /net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | |
parent | 6a57dba9f0107b21cab06f7c898935d747d4738a (diff) | |
download | linux-02e246aee868e982eecc25ee97d02acf2c2b8884.tar.xz |
Bluetooth: Fix lockdep warning with l2cap_chan_connect
The L2CAP connection's channel list lock (conn->chan_lock) must never be
taken while already holding a channel lock (chan->lock) in order to
avoid lock-inversion and lockdep warnings. So far the l2cap_chan_connect
function has acquired the chan->lock early in the function and then
later called l2cap_chan_add(conn, chan) which will try to take the
conn->chan_lock. This violates the correct order of taking the locks and
may lead to the following type of lockdep warnings:
-> #1 (&conn->chan_lock){+.+...}:
[<c109324d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x140
[<c188459c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6c/0x420
[<d0aab48e>] l2cap_chan_add+0x1e/0x40 [bluetooth]
[<d0aac618>] l2cap_chan_connect+0x348/0x8f0 [bluetooth]
[<d0cc9a91>] lowpan_control_write+0x221/0x2d0 [bluetooth_6lowpan]
-> #0 (&chan->lock){+.+.+.}:
[<c10928d8>] __lock_acquire+0x1a18/0x1d20
[<c109324d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x140
[<c188459c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6c/0x420
[<d0ab05fd>] l2cap_connect_cfm+0x1dd/0x3f0 [bluetooth]
[<d0a909c4>] hci_le_meta_evt+0x11a4/0x1260 [bluetooth]
[<d0a910eb>] hci_event_packet+0x3ab/0x3120 [bluetooth]
[<d0a7cb08>] hci_rx_work+0x208/0x4a0 [bluetooth]
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&conn->chan_lock);
lock(&chan->lock);
lock(&conn->chan_lock);
lock(&chan->lock);
Before calling l2cap_chan_add() the channel is not part of the
conn->chan_l list, and can therefore only be accessed by the L2CAP user
(such as l2cap_sock.c). We can therefore assume that it is the
responsibility of the user to handle mutual exclusion until this point
(which we can see is already true in l2cap_sock.c by it in many places
touching chan members without holding chan->lock).
Since the hci_conn and by exctension l2cap_conn creation in the
l2cap_chan_connect() function depend on chan details we cannot simply
add a mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock) in the beginning of the function
(since the conn object doesn't yet exist there). What we can do however
is move the chan->lock taking later into the function where we already
have the conn object and can that way take conn->chan_lock first.
This patch implements the above strategy and does some other necessary
changes such as using __l2cap_chan_add() which assumes conn->chan_lock
is held, as well as adding a second needed label so the unlocking
happens as it should.
Reported-by: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Tested-by: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c index 8d53fc57faba..b6f9777e057d 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c @@ -6980,8 +6980,6 @@ int l2cap_chan_connect(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __le16 psm, u16 cid, hci_dev_lock(hdev); - l2cap_chan_lock(chan); - if (!is_valid_psm(__le16_to_cpu(psm), dst_type) && !cid && chan->chan_type != L2CAP_CHAN_RAW) { err = -EINVAL; @@ -7078,17 +7076,20 @@ int l2cap_chan_connect(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __le16 psm, u16 cid, goto done; } + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock); + l2cap_chan_lock(chan); + if (cid && __l2cap_get_chan_by_dcid(conn, cid)) { hci_conn_drop(hcon); err = -EBUSY; - goto done; + goto chan_unlock; } /* Update source addr of the socket */ bacpy(&chan->src, &hcon->src); chan->src_type = bdaddr_type(hcon, hcon->src_type); - l2cap_chan_add(conn, chan); + __l2cap_chan_add(conn, chan); /* l2cap_chan_add takes its own ref so we can drop this one */ hci_conn_drop(hcon); @@ -7114,8 +7115,10 @@ int l2cap_chan_connect(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __le16 psm, u16 cid, err = 0; -done: +chan_unlock: l2cap_chan_unlock(chan); + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock); +done: hci_dev_unlock(hdev); hci_dev_put(hdev); return err; |