diff options
author | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> | 2014-10-29 13:03:09 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> | 2014-11-17 13:12:42 +0300 |
commit | fb7332a9fedfd62b1ba6530c86f39f0fa38afd49 (patch) | |
tree | 5e77bd4944da750634c4438df64257cdeaa58888 /mm | |
parent | 63648dd20fa0780ab6c1e923b5c276d257422cb3 (diff) | |
download | linux-fb7332a9fedfd62b1ba6530c86f39f0fa38afd49.tar.xz |
mmu_gather: move minimal range calculations into generic code
On architectures with hardware broadcasting of TLB invalidation messages
, it makes sense to reduce the range of the mmu_gather structure when
unmapping page ranges based on the dirty address information passed to
tlb_remove_tlb_entry.
arm64 already does this by directly manipulating the start/end fields
of the gather structure, but this confuses the generic code which
does not expect these fields to change and can end up calculating
invalid, negative ranges when forcing a flush in zap_pte_range.
This patch moves the minimal range calculation out of the arm64 code
and into the generic implementation, simplifying zap_pte_range in the
process (which no longer needs to care about start/end, since they will
point to the appropriate ranges already). With the range being tracked
by core code, the need_flush flag is dropped in favour of checking that
the end of the range has actually been set.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memory.c | 30 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 1cc6bfbd872e..c71edae9ba44 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -220,9 +220,6 @@ void tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long /* Is it from 0 to ~0? */ tlb->fullmm = !(start | (end+1)); tlb->need_flush_all = 0; - tlb->start = start; - tlb->end = end; - tlb->need_flush = 0; tlb->local.next = NULL; tlb->local.nr = 0; tlb->local.max = ARRAY_SIZE(tlb->__pages); @@ -232,15 +229,20 @@ void tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE tlb->batch = NULL; #endif + + __tlb_reset_range(tlb); } static void tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(struct mmu_gather *tlb) { - tlb->need_flush = 0; + if (!tlb->end) + return; + tlb_flush(tlb); #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE tlb_table_flush(tlb); #endif + __tlb_reset_range(tlb); } static void tlb_flush_mmu_free(struct mmu_gather *tlb) @@ -256,8 +258,6 @@ static void tlb_flush_mmu_free(struct mmu_gather *tlb) void tlb_flush_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb) { - if (!tlb->need_flush) - return; tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb); tlb_flush_mmu_free(tlb); } @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int __tlb_remove_page(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct page *page) { struct mmu_gather_batch *batch; - VM_BUG_ON(!tlb->need_flush); + VM_BUG_ON(!tlb->end); batch = tlb->active; batch->pages[batch->nr++] = page; @@ -359,8 +359,6 @@ void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table) { struct mmu_table_batch **batch = &tlb->batch; - tlb->need_flush = 1; - /* * When there's less then two users of this mm there cannot be a * concurrent page-table walk. @@ -1185,20 +1183,8 @@ again: arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(); /* Do the actual TLB flush before dropping ptl */ - if (force_flush) { - unsigned long old_end; - - /* - * Flush the TLB just for the previous segment, - * then update the range to be the remaining - * TLB range. - */ - old_end = tlb->end; - tlb->end = addr; + if (force_flush) tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb); - tlb->start = addr; - tlb->end = old_end; - } pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl); /* |