mm: Turn isolate_lru_page() into folio_isolate_lru()

Add isolate_lru_page() as a wrapper around isolate_lru_folio().
TestClearPageLRU() would have always failed on a tail page, so
returning -EBUSY is the same behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 74d3e5e8ebe9..55fb6d8e30fd 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2211,45 +2211,40 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
 }
 
 /**
- * isolate_lru_page - tries to isolate a page from its LRU list
- * @page: page to isolate from its LRU list
+ * folio_isolate_lru() - Try to isolate a folio from its LRU list.
+ * @folio: Folio to isolate from its LRU list.
  *
- * Isolates a @page from an LRU list, clears PageLRU and adjusts the
- * vmstat statistic corresponding to whatever LRU list the page was on.
+ * Isolate a @folio from an LRU list and adjust the vmstat statistic
+ * corresponding to whatever LRU list the folio was on.
  *
- * Returns 0 if the page was removed from an LRU list.
- * Returns -EBUSY if the page was not on an LRU list.
- *
- * The returned page will have PageLRU() cleared.  If it was found on
- * the active list, it will have PageActive set.  If it was found on
- * the unevictable list, it will have the PageUnevictable bit set. That flag
+ * The folio will have its LRU flag cleared.  If it was found on the
+ * active list, it will have the Active flag set.  If it was found on the
+ * unevictable list, it will have the Unevictable flag set.  These flags
  * may need to be cleared by the caller before letting the page go.
  *
- * The vmstat statistic corresponding to the list on which the page was
- * found will be decremented.
- *
- * Restrictions:
+ * Context:
  *
  * (1) Must be called with an elevated refcount on the page. This is a
- *     fundamental difference from isolate_lru_pages (which is called
+ *     fundamental difference from isolate_lru_pages() (which is called
  *     without a stable reference).
- * (2) the lru_lock must not be held.
- * (3) interrupts must be enabled.
+ * (2) The lru_lock must not be held.
+ * (3) Interrupts must be enabled.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 if the folio was removed from an LRU list.
+ * -EBUSY if the folio was not on an LRU list.
  */
-int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page)
+int folio_isolate_lru(struct folio *folio)
 {
-	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
 	int ret = -EBUSY;
 
-	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_count(page), page);
-	WARN_RATELIMIT(PageTail(page), "trying to isolate tail page");
+	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_ref_count(folio), folio);
 
-	if (TestClearPageLRU(page)) {
+	if (folio_test_clear_lru(folio)) {
 		struct lruvec *lruvec;
 
-		get_page(page);
+		folio_get(folio);
 		lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock_irq(folio);
-		del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec);
+		lruvec_del_folio(lruvec, folio);
 		unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
 		ret = 0;
 	}