diff options
| author | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2019-08-26 23:14:22 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> | 2019-09-07 10:28:04 +0300 |
| commit | 66204f1d2d1b42962033dfa867442f3dfd898d5f (patch) | |
| tree | e69ce0dea0a7ec2b48d1fd73e1e59e305993942f /mm/mmu_notifier.c | |
| parent | 23b68395c7c78a764e8963fc15a7cfd318bf187f (diff) | |
| download | linux-66204f1d2d1b42962033dfa867442f3dfd898d5f.tar.xz | |
mm/mmu_notifiers: prime lockdep
We want to teach lockdep that mmu notifiers can be called from direct
reclaim paths, since on many CI systems load might never reach that
level (e.g. when just running fuzzer or small functional tests).
I've put the annotation into mmu_notifier_register since only when we have
mmu notifiers registered is there any point in teaching lockdep about
them. Also, we already have a kmalloc(, GFP_KERNEL), so this is safe.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190826201425.17547-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/mmu_notifier.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/mmu_notifier.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c index 05d98167da7b..3f39fb1402db 100644 --- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c +++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c @@ -243,6 +243,13 @@ int __mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm) lockdep_assert_held_write(&mm->mmap_sem); BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 0); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) { + fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); + lock_map_acquire(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map); + lock_map_release(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map); + fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); + } + mn->mm = mm; mn->users = 1; |