diff options
| author | Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> | 2008-09-21 01:38:02 +0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2008-09-22 18:28:32 +0400 |
| commit | 15afe09bf496ae10c989e1a375a6b5da7bd3e16e (patch) | |
| tree | 4565659d1084e357eea42e6321a4d304ac950faa /kernel/sched_fair.c | |
| parent | 09b22a2f678ae733801b888c44756d0abd686b8a (diff) | |
| download | linux-15afe09bf496ae10c989e1a375a6b5da7bd3e16e.tar.xz | |
sched: wakeup preempt when small overlap
Lin Ming reported a 10% OLTP regression against 2.6.27-rc4.
The difference seems to come from different preemption agressiveness,
which affects the cache footprint of the workload and its effective
cache trashing.
Aggresively preempt a task if its avg overlap is very small, this should
avoid the task going to sleep and find it still running when we schedule
back to it - saving a wakeup.
Reported-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched_fair.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched_fair.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c index a10ac0bcee64..7328383690f1 100644 --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c @@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ static inline int depth_se(struct sched_entity *se) /* * Preempt the current task with a newly woken task if needed: */ -static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) +static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sync) { struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr; struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(curr); @@ -1367,6 +1367,13 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) if (!sched_feat(WAKEUP_PREEMPT)) return; + if (sched_feat(WAKEUP_OVERLAP) && sync && + se->avg_overlap < sysctl_sched_migration_cost && + pse->avg_overlap < sysctl_sched_migration_cost) { + resched_task(curr); + return; + } + /* * preemption test can be made between sibling entities who are in the * same cfs_rq i.e who have a common parent. Walk up the hierarchy of @@ -1649,7 +1656,7 @@ static void prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, if (p->prio > oldprio) resched_task(rq->curr); } else - check_preempt_curr(rq, p); + check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0); } /* @@ -1666,7 +1673,7 @@ static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, if (running) resched_task(rq->curr); else - check_preempt_curr(rq, p); + check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0); } /* Account for a task changing its policy or group. |