summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>2021-04-22 20:02:36 +0300
committerPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>2021-05-12 12:43:23 +0300
commite5e678e4fea26d73444f4427cbbaeab4fa79ecee (patch)
tree87538ce381a47c6ec2b6edbfc90e7b67159002cd /kernel/sched
parent2b8ca1a907d5fffc85fb648bbace28ddf3420825 (diff)
downloadlinux-e5e678e4fea26d73444f4427cbbaeab4fa79ecee.tar.xz
sched,fair: Skip newidle_balance if a wakeup is pending
The try_to_wake_up function has an optimization where it can queue a task for wakeup on its previous CPU, if the task is still in the middle of going to sleep inside schedule(). Once schedule() re-enables IRQs, the task will be woken up with an IPI, and placed back on the runqueue. If we have such a wakeup pending, there is no need to search other CPUs for runnable tasks. Just skip (or bail out early from) newidle balancing, and run the just woken up task. For a memcache like workload test, this reduces total CPU use by about 2%, proportionally split between user and system time, and p99 and p95 application response time by 10% on average. The schedstats run_delay number shows a similar improvement. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422130236.0bb353df@imladris.surriel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched')
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched/fair.c11
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 3248e24a90b0..d10c6cc4609c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10592,6 +10592,14 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
u64 curr_cost = 0;
update_misfit_status(NULL, this_rq);
+
+ /*
+ * There is a task waiting to run. No need to search for one.
+ * Return 0; the task will be enqueued when switching to idle.
+ */
+ if (this_rq->ttwu_pending)
+ return 0;
+
/*
* We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such that we
* measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
@@ -10657,7 +10665,8 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
* Stop searching for tasks to pull if there are
* now runnable tasks on this rq.
*/
- if (pulled_task || this_rq->nr_running > 0)
+ if (pulled_task || this_rq->nr_running > 0 ||
+ this_rq->ttwu_pending)
break;
}
rcu_read_unlock();