summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/locking
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>2014-01-20 22:20:06 +0400
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2014-02-10 00:18:54 +0400
commitfb9edbe98493fcd9df66de926ae9157cbe0e4dcd (patch)
tree9fc6c5acfcd5c99bd9cf13a177ea3fd0b794cb3f /kernel/locking
parentddf1d169c0a489d498c1799a7043904a43b0c159 (diff)
downloadlinux-fb9edbe98493fcd9df66de926ae9157cbe0e4dcd.tar.xz
lockdep: Make held_lock->check and "int check" argument bool
The "int check" argument of lock_acquire() and held_lock->check are misleading. This is actually a boolean: 2 means "true", everything else is "false". And there is no need to pass 1 or 0 to lock_acquire() depending on CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, __lock_acquire() checks prove_locking at the start and clears "check" if !CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. Note: probably we can simply kill this member/arg. The only explicit user of check => 0 is rcu_lock_acquire(), perhaps we can change it to use lock_acquire(trylock =>, read => 2). __lockdep_no_validate means check => 0 implicitly, but we can change validate_chain() to check hlock->instance->key instead. Not to mention it would be nice to get rid of lockdep_set_novalidate_class(). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140120182006.GA26495@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/lockdep.c11
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index eb8a54783fa0..8c85a0da5a38 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2098,7 +2098,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
* (If lookup_chain_cache() returns with 1 it acquires
* graph_lock for us)
*/
- if (!hlock->trylock && (hlock->check == 2) &&
+ if (!hlock->trylock && hlock->check &&
lookup_chain_cache(curr, hlock, chain_key)) {
/*
* Check whether last held lock:
@@ -3055,9 +3055,6 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
int class_idx;
u64 chain_key;
- if (!prove_locking)
- check = 1;
-
if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
return 0;
@@ -3069,8 +3066,8 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
return 0;
- if (lock->key == &__lockdep_no_validate__)
- check = 1;
+ if (!prove_locking || lock->key == &__lockdep_no_validate__)
+ check = 0;
if (subclass < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES)
class = lock->class_cache[subclass];
@@ -3138,7 +3135,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
hlock->holdtime_stamp = lockstat_clock();
#endif
- if (check == 2 && !mark_irqflags(curr, hlock))
+ if (check && !mark_irqflags(curr, hlock))
return 0;
/* mark it as used: */