summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>2017-08-07 21:45:20 +0300
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2017-08-09 04:11:17 +0300
commit752ba56fb130b27c32c2ae6c82c8ef246b22106c (patch)
tree5ee1b20c2245bc4a75281a2323807642793ed49b /kernel/bpf/syscall.c
parent58291a7465f6b88248c9f34807c16705bd5698f8 (diff)
downloadlinux-752ba56fb130b27c32c2ae6c82c8ef246b22106c.tar.xz
bpf: Extend check_uarg_tail_zero() checks
The function check_uarg_tail_zero() was created from bpf(2) for BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD without taking the access_ok() nor the PAGE_SIZE checks. Make this checks more generally available while unlikely to be triggered, extend the memory range check and add an explanation including why the ToCToU should not be a security concern. Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAGXu5j+vRGFvJZmjtAcT8Hi8B+Wz0e1b6VKYZHfQP_=DXzC4CQ@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/syscall.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/syscall.c26
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index c653ee0bd162..fbe09a0cccf4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -48,6 +48,15 @@ static const struct bpf_map_ops * const bpf_map_types[] = {
#undef BPF_MAP_TYPE
};
+/*
+ * If we're handed a bigger struct than we know of, ensure all the unknown bits
+ * are 0 - i.e. new user-space does not rely on any kernel feature extensions
+ * we don't know about yet.
+ *
+ * There is a ToCToU between this function call and the following
+ * copy_from_user() call. However, this is not a concern since this function is
+ * meant to be a future-proofing of bits.
+ */
static int check_uarg_tail_zero(void __user *uaddr,
size_t expected_size,
size_t actual_size)
@@ -57,6 +66,12 @@ static int check_uarg_tail_zero(void __user *uaddr,
unsigned char val;
int err;
+ if (unlikely(actual_size > PAGE_SIZE)) /* silly large */
+ return -E2BIG;
+
+ if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, uaddr, actual_size)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
if (actual_size <= expected_size)
return 0;
@@ -1393,17 +1408,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, siz
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled)
return -EPERM;
- if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, uattr, 1))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- if (size > PAGE_SIZE) /* silly large */
- return -E2BIG;
-
- /* If we're handed a bigger struct than we know of,
- * ensure all the unknown bits are 0 - i.e. new
- * user-space does not rely on any kernel feature
- * extensions we dont know about yet.
- */
err = check_uarg_tail_zero(uattr, sizeof(attr), size);
if (err)
return err;