bpf: offload: add infrastructure for loading programs for a specific netdev

The fact that we don't know which device the program is going
to be used on is quite limiting in current eBPF infrastructure.
We have to reverse or limit the changes which kernel makes to
the loaded bytecode if we want it to be offloaded to a networking
device.  We also have to invent new APIs for debugging and
troubleshooting support.

Make it possible to load programs for a specific netdev.  This
helps us to bring the debug information closer to the core
eBPF infrastructure (e.g. we will be able to reuse the verifer
log in device JIT).  It allows device JITs to perform translation
on the original bytecode.

__bpf_prog_get() when called to get a reference for an attachment
point will now refuse to give it if program has a device assigned.
Following patches will add a version of that function which passes
the expected netdev in. @type argument in __bpf_prog_get() is
renamed to attach_type to make it clearer that it's only set on
attachment.

All calls to ndo_bpf are protected by rtnl, only verifier callbacks
are not.  We need a wait queue to make sure netdev doesn't get
destroyed while verifier is still running and calling its driver.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 182 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/offload.c b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5553e0e2f8b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/printk.h>
+#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
+
+/* protected by RTNL */
+static LIST_HEAD(bpf_prog_offload_devs);
+
+int bpf_prog_offload_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
+{
+	struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
+	struct bpf_dev_offload *offload;
+
+	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	if (attr->prog_flags)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	offload = kzalloc(sizeof(*offload), GFP_USER);
+	if (!offload)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	offload->prog = prog;
+	init_waitqueue_head(&offload->verifier_done);
+
+	rtnl_lock();
+	offload->netdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, attr->prog_target_ifindex);
+	if (!offload->netdev) {
+		rtnl_unlock();
+		kfree(offload);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	prog->aux->offload = offload;
+	list_add_tail(&offload->offloads, &bpf_prog_offload_devs);
+	rtnl_unlock();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __bpf_offload_ndo(struct bpf_prog *prog, enum bpf_netdev_command cmd,
+			     struct netdev_bpf *data)
+{
+	struct net_device *netdev = prog->aux->offload->netdev;
+
+	ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+	if (!netdev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+	if (!netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	data->command = cmd;
+
+	return netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf(netdev, data);
+}
+
+int bpf_prog_offload_verifier_prep(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+	struct netdev_bpf data = {};
+	int err;
+
+	data.verifier.prog = env->prog;
+
+	rtnl_lock();
+	err = __bpf_offload_ndo(env->prog, BPF_OFFLOAD_VERIFIER_PREP, &data);
+	if (err)
+		goto exit_unlock;
+
+	env->dev_ops = data.verifier.ops;
+
+	env->prog->aux->offload->dev_state = true;
+	env->prog->aux->offload->verifier_running = true;
+exit_unlock:
+	rtnl_unlock();
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	struct bpf_dev_offload *offload = prog->aux->offload;
+	struct netdev_bpf data = {};
+
+	data.offload.prog = prog;
+
+	if (offload->verifier_running)
+		wait_event(offload->verifier_done, !offload->verifier_running);
+
+	if (offload->dev_state)
+		WARN_ON(__bpf_offload_ndo(prog, BPF_OFFLOAD_DESTROY, &data));
+
+	offload->dev_state = false;
+	list_del_init(&offload->offloads);
+	offload->netdev = NULL;
+}
+
+void bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	struct bpf_dev_offload *offload = prog->aux->offload;
+
+	offload->verifier_running = false;
+	wake_up(&offload->verifier_done);
+
+	rtnl_lock();
+	__bpf_prog_offload_destroy(prog);
+	rtnl_unlock();
+
+	kfree(offload);
+}
+
+static int bpf_prog_offload_translate(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	struct bpf_dev_offload *offload = prog->aux->offload;
+	struct netdev_bpf data = {};
+	int ret;
+
+	data.offload.prog = prog;
+
+	offload->verifier_running = false;
+	wake_up(&offload->verifier_done);
+
+	rtnl_lock();
+	ret = __bpf_offload_ndo(prog, BPF_OFFLOAD_TRANSLATE, &data);
+	rtnl_unlock();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static unsigned int bpf_prog_warn_on_exec(const void *ctx,
+					  const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+	WARN(1, "attempt to execute device eBPF program on the host!");
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int bpf_prog_offload_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	prog->bpf_func = bpf_prog_warn_on_exec;
+
+	return bpf_prog_offload_translate(prog);
+}
+
+const struct bpf_prog_ops bpf_offload_prog_ops = {
+};
+
+static int bpf_offload_notification(struct notifier_block *notifier,
+				    ulong event, void *ptr)
+{
+	struct net_device *netdev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
+	struct bpf_dev_offload *offload, *tmp;
+
+	ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+	switch (event) {
+	case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
+		list_for_each_entry_safe(offload, tmp, &bpf_prog_offload_devs,
+					 offloads) {
+			if (offload->netdev == netdev)
+				__bpf_prog_offload_destroy(offload->prog);
+		}
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block bpf_offload_notifier = {
+	.notifier_call = bpf_offload_notification,
+};
+
+static int __init bpf_offload_init(void)
+{
+	register_netdevice_notifier(&bpf_offload_notifier);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+subsys_initcall(bpf_offload_init);