diff options
author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2022-09-03 00:10:51 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2022-09-05 16:33:06 +0300 |
commit | 8d5a8011b35d387c490a5c977b1d9eb4798aa071 (patch) | |
tree | 83f515cd987e8a9209f74a1941cc12df0fa0cb71 /kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | |
parent | 7c266178aa51dd2d4fda1312c5990a8a82c83d70 (diff) | |
download | linux-8d5a8011b35d387c490a5c977b1d9eb4798aa071.tar.xz |
bpf: Batch call_rcu callbacks instead of SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU.
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU makes kmem_caches non mergeable and slows down
kmem_cache_destroy. All bpf_mem_cache are safe to share across different maps
and programs. Convert SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to batched call_rcu. This change
solves the memory consumption issue, avoids kmem_cache_destroy latency and
keeps bpf hash map performance the same.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220902211058.60789-10-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/memalloc.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 65 |
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c index 7e5df6866d92..5d8648a01b5c 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c @@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ struct bpf_mem_cache { /* count of objects in free_llist */ int free_cnt; int low_watermark, high_watermark, batch; + + struct rcu_head rcu; + struct llist_head free_by_rcu; + struct llist_head waiting_for_gp; + atomic_t call_rcu_in_progress; }; struct bpf_mem_caches { @@ -194,6 +199,45 @@ static void free_one(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj) kfree(obj); } +static void __free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + struct bpf_mem_cache *c = container_of(head, struct bpf_mem_cache, rcu); + struct llist_node *llnode = llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp); + struct llist_node *pos, *t; + + llist_for_each_safe(pos, t, llnode) + free_one(c, pos); + atomic_set(&c->call_rcu_in_progress, 0); +} + +static void enque_to_free(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj) +{ + struct llist_node *llnode = obj; + + /* bpf_mem_cache is a per-cpu object. Freeing happens in irq_work. + * Nothing races to add to free_by_rcu list. + */ + __llist_add(llnode, &c->free_by_rcu); +} + +static void do_call_rcu(struct bpf_mem_cache *c) +{ + struct llist_node *llnode, *t; + + if (atomic_xchg(&c->call_rcu_in_progress, 1)) + return; + + WARN_ON_ONCE(!llist_empty(&c->waiting_for_gp)); + llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, __llist_del_all(&c->free_by_rcu)) + /* There is no concurrent __llist_add(waiting_for_gp) access. + * It doesn't race with llist_del_all either. + * But there could be two concurrent llist_del_all(waiting_for_gp): + * from __free_rcu() and from drain_mem_cache(). + */ + __llist_add(llnode, &c->waiting_for_gp); + call_rcu(&c->rcu, __free_rcu); +} + static void free_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c) { struct llist_node *llnode, *t; @@ -212,12 +256,13 @@ static void free_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c) local_dec(&c->active); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) local_irq_restore(flags); - free_one(c, llnode); + enque_to_free(c, llnode); } while (cnt > (c->high_watermark + c->low_watermark) / 2); /* and drain free_llist_extra */ llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->free_llist_extra)) - free_one(c, llnode); + enque_to_free(c, llnode); + do_call_rcu(c); } static void bpf_mem_refill(struct irq_work *work) @@ -303,7 +348,7 @@ int bpf_mem_alloc_init(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, int size) return -ENOMEM; size += LLIST_NODE_SZ; /* room for llist_node */ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "bpf-%u", size); - kmem_cache = kmem_cache_create(buf, size, 8, SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, NULL); + kmem_cache = kmem_cache_create(buf, size, 8, 0, NULL); if (!kmem_cache) { free_percpu(pc); return -ENOMEM; @@ -345,6 +390,15 @@ static void drain_mem_cache(struct bpf_mem_cache *c) { struct llist_node *llnode, *t; + /* The caller has done rcu_barrier() and no progs are using this + * bpf_mem_cache, but htab_map_free() called bpf_mem_cache_free() for + * all remaining elements and they can be in free_by_rcu or in + * waiting_for_gp lists, so drain those lists now. + */ + llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, __llist_del_all(&c->free_by_rcu)) + free_one(c, llnode); + llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp)) + free_one(c, llnode); llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->free_llist)) free_one(c, llnode); llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->free_llist_extra)) @@ -366,6 +420,10 @@ void bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma) kmem_cache_destroy(c->kmem_cache); if (c->objcg) obj_cgroup_put(c->objcg); + /* c->waiting_for_gp list was drained, but __free_rcu might + * still execute. Wait for it now before we free 'c'. + */ + rcu_barrier(); free_percpu(ma->cache); ma->cache = NULL; } @@ -379,6 +437,7 @@ void bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma) } if (c->objcg) obj_cgroup_put(c->objcg); + rcu_barrier(); free_percpu(ma->caches); ma->caches = NULL; } |