bpf: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200227001744.GA3317@embeddedor

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 1acd5bf70350..9aa33b8f3d55 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_array_item {
 
 struct bpf_prog_array {
 	struct rcu_head rcu;
-	struct bpf_prog_array_item items[0];
+	struct bpf_prog_array_item items[];
 };
 
 struct bpf_prog_array *bpf_prog_array_alloc(u32 prog_cnt, gfp_t flags);