diff options
| author | Carmeli Tamir <carmeli.tamir@gmail.com> | 2019-01-04 02:27:53 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-01-05 00:13:47 +0300 |
| commit | b553337a57cf4f077464292520f4e975ea4cda83 (patch) | |
| tree | 1f31297f5cc7b06eb9ae84b4a2ae3f00fbe55d24 /fs | |
| parent | 9da22854761a76c45d78aa2ae2b4bbd504b4f171 (diff) | |
| download | linux-b553337a57cf4f077464292520f4e975ea4cda83.tar.xz | |
fat: remove FAT_FIRST_ENT macro
The comment edited in this patch was the only reference to the
FAT_FIRST_ENT macro, which is not used anymore. Moreover, the commented
line of code does not compile with the current code.
Since the FAT_FIRST_ENT macro checks the FAT variant in a way that the
patch series changes, I removed it, and instead wrote a clear
explanation of what was checked.
I verified that the changed comment is correct according to Microsoft
FAT spec, search for "BPB_Media" in the following references:
1. Microsoft FAT specification 2005
(http://read.pudn.com/downloads77/ebook/294884/FAT32%20Spec%20%28SDA%20Contribution%29.pdf).
Search for 'volume label'.
2. Microsoft Extensible Firmware Initiative, FAT32 File System Specification
(https://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/fatgen103.pdf).
Search for 'volume label'.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1544990640-11604-2-git-send-email-carmeli.tamir@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Carmeli Tamir <carmeli.tamir@gmail.com>
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/fat/inode.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/fs/fat/inode.c b/fs/fat/inode.c index c0b5b5c3373b..269e7b91b8b1 100644 --- a/fs/fat/inode.c +++ b/fs/fat/inode.c @@ -1803,11 +1803,15 @@ int fat_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent, int isvfat, fat_ent_access_init(sb); /* - * The low byte of FAT's first entry must have same value with - * media-field. But in real world, too many devices is - * writing wrong value. So, removed that validity check. + * The low byte of the first FAT entry must have the same value as + * the media field of the boot sector. But in real world, too many + * devices are writing wrong values. So, removed that validity check. * - * if (FAT_FIRST_ENT(sb, media) != first) + * The removed check compared the first FAT entry to a value dependent + * on the media field like this: + * == (0x0F00 | media), for FAT12 + * == (0XFF00 | media), for FAT16 + * == (0x0FFFFF | media), for FAT32 */ error = -EINVAL; |