diff options
author | Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> | 2015-09-17 14:47:08 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> | 2015-10-13 00:31:03 +0300 |
commit | 35a92fe8770ce54c5eb275cd76128645bea2d200 (patch) | |
tree | 3c844e8991d12036688ece6073cd6f2d4cd17b13 /fs/omfs | |
parent | 3be7f32878e742cf3c17b435c90e198862457706 (diff) | |
download | linux-35a92fe8770ce54c5eb275cd76128645bea2d200.tar.xz |
nfsd: serialize state seqid morphing operations
Andrew was seeing a race occur when an OPEN and OPEN_DOWNGRADE were
running in parallel. The server would receive the OPEN_DOWNGRADE first
and check its seqid, but then an OPEN would race in and bump it. The
OPEN_DOWNGRADE would then complete and bump the seqid again. The result
was that the OPEN_DOWNGRADE would be applied after the OPEN, even though
it should have been rejected since the seqid changed.
The only recourse we have here I think is to serialize operations that
bump the seqid in a stateid, particularly when we're given a seqid in
the call. To address this, we add a new rw_semaphore to the
nfs4_ol_stateid struct. We do a down_write prior to checking the seqid
after looking up the stateid to ensure that nothing else is going to
bump it while we're operating on it.
In the case of OPEN, we do a down_read, as the call doesn't contain a
seqid. Those can run in parallel -- we just need to serialize them when
there is a concurrent OPEN_DOWNGRADE or CLOSE.
LOCK and LOCKU however always take the write lock as there is no
opportunity for parallelizing those.
Reported-and-Tested-by: Andrew W Elble <aweits@rit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/omfs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions