summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/jbd/commit.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>2011-11-19 13:34:29 +0400
committerJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>2011-11-22 04:20:53 +0400
commit8c111b3f56332a216b18cd57950bdf04ac8f2a98 (patch)
tree9295744be006082391c9bfeed2cabf43b29cc4ea /fs/jbd/commit.c
parent63894ab9f63a688f6b0b8cdd01ac0a9f36d507b8 (diff)
downloadlinux-8c111b3f56332a216b18cd57950bdf04ac8f2a98.tar.xz
jbd: clear revoked flag on buffers before a new transaction started
Currently, we clear revoked flag only when a block is reused. However, this can tigger a false journal error. Consider a situation when a block is used as a meta block and is deleted(revoked) in ordered mode, then the block is allocated as a data block to a file. At this moment, user changes the file's journal mode from ordered to journaled and truncates the file. The block will be considered re-revoked by journal because it has revoked flag still pending from the last transaction and an assertion triggers. We fix the problem by keeping the revoked status more uptodate - we clear revoked flag when switching revoke tables to reflect there is no revoked buffers in current transaction any more. Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jbd/commit.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/jbd/commit.c6
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/jbd/commit.c b/fs/jbd/commit.c
index 8799207df058..f2b9a571f4cf 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/commit.c
@@ -392,6 +392,12 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
jbd_debug (3, "JBD: commit phase 1\n");
/*
+ * Clear revoked flag to reflect there is no revoked buffers
+ * in the next transaction which is going to be started.
+ */
+ journal_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal);
+
+ /*
* Switch to a new revoke table.
*/
journal_switch_revoke_table(journal);