diff options
author | Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org> | 2010-02-24 15:25:35 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> | 2010-10-04 23:10:44 +0400 |
commit | 3e44f9f1dc19e2b8d4f7ca3b3c63e976b22ad372 (patch) | |
tree | 85e61adb1cb41d726cd8bb2300777c91676c1702 /fs/fat/namei_msdos.c | |
parent | 6841c05021236b8d394cc6c41aa6ae17623aef13 (diff) | |
download | linux-3e44f9f1dc19e2b8d4f7ca3b3c63e976b22ad372.tar.xz |
BKL: Remove BKL from ext2 filesystem
The BKL is still used in ext2_put_super(), ext2_fill_super(), ext2_sync_fs()
ext2_remount() and ext2_write_inode(). From these calls ext2_put_super(),
ext2_fill_super() and ext2_remount() are protected against each other by
the struct super_block s_umount rw semaphore. The call in ext2_write_inode()
could only protect the modification of the ext2_sb_info through
ext2_update_dynamic_rev() against concurrent ext2_sync_fs() or ext2_remount().
ext2_fill_super() and ext2_put_super() can be left out because you need a
valid filesystem reference in all three cases, which you do not have when
you are one of these functions.
If the BKL is only protecting the modification of the ext2_sb_info it can
safely be removed since this is protected by the struct ext2_sb_info s_lock.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/fat/namei_msdos.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions