summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/fat/namei_msdos.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>2010-02-24 15:25:35 +0300
committerArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>2010-10-04 23:10:44 +0400
commit3e44f9f1dc19e2b8d4f7ca3b3c63e976b22ad372 (patch)
tree85e61adb1cb41d726cd8bb2300777c91676c1702 /fs/fat/namei_msdos.c
parent6841c05021236b8d394cc6c41aa6ae17623aef13 (diff)
downloadlinux-3e44f9f1dc19e2b8d4f7ca3b3c63e976b22ad372.tar.xz
BKL: Remove BKL from ext2 filesystem
The BKL is still used in ext2_put_super(), ext2_fill_super(), ext2_sync_fs() ext2_remount() and ext2_write_inode(). From these calls ext2_put_super(), ext2_fill_super() and ext2_remount() are protected against each other by the struct super_block s_umount rw semaphore. The call in ext2_write_inode() could only protect the modification of the ext2_sb_info through ext2_update_dynamic_rev() against concurrent ext2_sync_fs() or ext2_remount(). ext2_fill_super() and ext2_put_super() can be left out because you need a valid filesystem reference in all three cases, which you do not have when you are one of these functions. If the BKL is only protecting the modification of the ext2_sb_info it can safely be removed since this is protected by the struct ext2_sb_info s_lock. Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/fat/namei_msdos.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions