diff options
author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2012-02-24 23:07:11 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2012-02-24 23:42:50 +0400 |
commit | d80e731ecab420ddcb79ee9d0ac427acbc187b4b (patch) | |
tree | e96a660b75b5bee8ae2c315878ec917b9c0da446 /fs/eventpoll.c | |
parent | 855a85f704026d5fe7de94fb1b765fe03404507f (diff) | |
download | linux-d80e731ecab420ddcb79ee9d0ac427acbc187b4b.tar.xz |
epoll: introduce POLLFREE to flush ->signalfd_wqh before kfree()
This patch is intentionally incomplete to simplify the review.
It ignores ep_unregister_pollwait() which plays with the same wqh.
See the next change.
epoll assumes that the EPOLL_CTL_ADD'ed file controls everything
f_op->poll() needs. In particular it assumes that the wait queue
can't go away until eventpoll_release(). This is not true in case
of signalfd, the task which does EPOLL_CTL_ADD uses its ->sighand
which is not connected to the file.
This patch adds the special event, POLLFREE, currently only for
epoll. It expects that init_poll_funcptr()'ed hook should do the
necessary cleanup. Perhaps it should be defined as EPOLLFREE in
eventpoll.
__cleanup_sighand() is changed to do wake_up_poll(POLLFREE) if
->signalfd_wqh is not empty, we add the new signalfd_cleanup()
helper.
ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) simply does list_del_init(task_list).
This make this poll entry inconsistent, but we don't care. If you
share epoll fd which contains our sigfd with another process you
should blame yourself. signalfd is "really special". I simply do
not know how we can define the "right" semantics if it used with
epoll.
The main problem is, epoll calls signalfd_poll() once to establish
the connection with the wait queue, after that signalfd_poll(NULL)
returns the different/inconsistent results depending on who does
EPOLL_CTL_MOD/signalfd_read/etc. IOW: apart from sigmask, signalfd
has nothing to do with the file, it works with the current thread.
In short: this patch is the hack which tries to fix the symptoms.
It also assumes that nobody can take tasklist_lock under epoll
locks, this seems to be true.
Note:
- we do not have wake_up_all_poll() but wake_up_poll()
is fine, poll/epoll doesn't use WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE.
- signalfd_cleanup() uses POLLHUP along with POLLFREE,
we need a couple of simple changes in eventpoll.c to
make sure it can't be "lost".
Reported-by: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/eventpoll.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/eventpoll.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c index aabdfc38cf24..34bbfc6dd8dc 100644 --- a/fs/eventpoll.c +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c @@ -842,6 +842,10 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *k struct epitem *epi = ep_item_from_wait(wait); struct eventpoll *ep = epi->ep; + /* the caller holds eppoll_entry->whead->lock */ + if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE) + list_del_init(&wait->task_list); + spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags); /* |