summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>2019-09-18 15:08:52 +0300
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2019-09-24 15:45:02 +0300
commit9f7fec0ba89108b9385f1b9fb167861224912a4a (patch)
tree9247eada69ea25280c58f7b9f14324dd6d488918 /fs/btrfs
parent6af112b11a4bc1b560f60a618ac9c1dcefe9836e (diff)
downloadlinux-9f7fec0ba89108b9385f1b9fb167861224912a4a.tar.xz
Btrfs: fix selftests failure due to uninitialized i_mode in test inodes
Some of the self tests create a test inode, setup some extents and then do calls to btrfs_get_extent() to test that the corresponding extent maps exist and are correct. However btrfs_get_extent(), since the 5.2 merge window, now errors out when it finds a regular or prealloc extent for an inode that does not correspond to a regular file (its ->i_mode is not S_IFREG). This causes the self tests to fail sometimes, specially when KASAN, slub_debug and page poisoning are enabled: $ modprobe btrfs modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'btrfs': Invalid argument $ dmesg [ 9414.691648] Btrfs loaded, crc32c=crc32c-intel, debug=on, assert=on, integrity-checker=on, ref-verify=on [ 9414.692655] BTRFS: selftest: sectorsize: 4096 nodesize: 4096 [ 9414.692658] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs free space cache tests [ 9414.692918] BTRFS: selftest: running extent only tests [ 9414.693061] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap only tests [ 9414.693366] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap and extent tests [ 9414.696455] BTRFS: selftest: running space stealing from bitmap to extent tests [ 9414.697131] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer operation tests [ 9414.697133] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_split_item tests [ 9414.697564] BTRFS: selftest: running extent I/O tests [ 9414.697583] BTRFS: selftest: running find delalloc tests [ 9415.081125] BTRFS: selftest: running find_first_clear_extent_bit test [ 9415.081278] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer bitmap tests [ 9415.124192] BTRFS: selftest: running inode tests [ 9415.124195] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_get_extent tests [ 9415.127909] BTRFS: selftest: running hole first btrfs_get_extent test [ 9415.128343] BTRFS critical (device (efault)): regular/prealloc extent found for non-regular inode 256 [ 9415.131428] BTRFS: selftest: fs/btrfs/tests/inode-tests.c:904 expected a real extent, got 0 This happens because the test inodes are created without ever initializing the i_mode field of the inode, and neither VFS's new_inode() nor the btrfs callback btrfs_alloc_inode() initialize the i_mode. Initialization of the i_mode is done through the various callbacks used by the VFS to create new inodes (regular files, directories, symlinks, tmpfiles, etc), which all call btrfs_new_inode() which in turn calls inode_init_owner(), which sets the inode's i_mode. Since the tests only uses new_inode() to create the test inodes, the i_mode was never initialized. This always happens on a VM I used with kasan, slub_debug and many other debug facilities enabled. It also happened to someone who reported this on bugzilla (on a 5.3-rc). Fix this by setting i_mode to S_IFREG at btrfs_new_test_inode(). Fixes: 6bf9e4bd6a2778 ("btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer dereference") Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204397 Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c8
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c
index b5e80563efaa..99fe9bf3fdac 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c
@@ -52,7 +52,13 @@ static struct file_system_type test_type = {
struct inode *btrfs_new_test_inode(void)
{
- return new_inode(test_mnt->mnt_sb);
+ struct inode *inode;
+
+ inode = new_inode(test_mnt->mnt_sb);
+ if (inode)
+ inode_init_owner(inode, NULL, S_IFREG);
+
+ return inode;
}
static int btrfs_init_test_fs(void)