diff options
| author | Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> | 2018-11-19 12:38:17 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2018-12-17 16:51:37 +0300 |
| commit | ce9f967f31ea91365c0aa897dbc2bddbd39d7a73 (patch) | |
| tree | b58442541dbac871d1b42d877f66bc1662ef9b08 /fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c | |
| parent | f8f591df7d725e3b1ea97e13ac830791b7c4a038 (diff) | |
| download | linux-ce9f967f31ea91365c0aa897dbc2bddbd39d7a73.tar.xz | |
btrfs: use EXPORT_FOR_TESTS for conditionally exported functions
Several functions in BTRFS are only used inside the source file they are
declared if CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS is not defined. However if
CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS is defined these functions are shared
with the unit tests code.
Before the introduction of the EXPORT_FOR_TESTS macro, these functions
could not be declared as static and the compiler had a harder task when
optimizing and inlining them.
As we have EXPORT_FOR_TESTS now, use it where appropriate to support the
compiler.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c index db073fdbdd65..d33f9a95bce1 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize) set_extent_delalloc(&tmp, 0, sectorsize - 1, 0, NULL); start = 0; end = 0; - found = btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start, + found = find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start, &end); if (!found) { test_err("should have found at least one delalloc"); @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize) set_extent_delalloc(&tmp, sectorsize, max_bytes - 1, 0, NULL); start = test_start; end = 0; - found = btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start, + found = find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start, &end); if (!found) { test_err("couldn't find delalloc in our range"); @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize) } start = test_start; end = 0; - found = btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start, + found = find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start, &end); if (found) { test_err("found range when we shouldn't have"); @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize) set_extent_delalloc(&tmp, max_bytes, total_dirty - 1, 0, NULL); start = test_start; end = 0; - found = btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start, + found = find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start, &end); if (!found) { test_err("didn't find our range"); @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize) * this changes at any point in the future we will need to fix this * tests expected behavior. */ - found = btrfs_find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start, + found = find_lock_delalloc_range(inode, &tmp, locked_page, &start, &end); if (!found) { test_err("didn't find our range"); |