diff options
author | Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> | 2020-01-30 15:59:45 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2020-03-23 19:01:44 +0300 |
commit | dcc3eb9638c3c927f1597075e851d0a16300a876 (patch) | |
tree | 54f66a1620f2fd268c5638b316d40d2e28e9cd7e /fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | |
parent | 2992df73268f78ec9281692b9b44ae92f3933b54 (diff) | |
download | linux-dcc3eb9638c3c927f1597075e851d0a16300a876.tar.xz |
btrfs: convert snapshot/nocow exlcusion to drew lock
This patch removes all haphazard code implementing nocow writers
exclusion from pending snapshot creation and switches to using the drew
lock to ensure this invariant still holds.
'Readers' are snapshot creators from create_snapshot and 'writers' are
nocow writers from buffered write path or btrfs_setsize. This locking
scheme allows for multiple snapshots to happen while any nocow writers
are blocked, since writes to page cache in the nocow path will make
snapshots inconsistent.
So for performance reasons we'd like to have the ability to run multiple
concurrent snapshots and also favors readers in this case. And in case
there aren't pending snapshots (which will be the majority of the cases)
we rely on the percpu's writers counter to avoid cacheline contention.
The main gain from using the drew lock is it's now a lot easier to
reason about the guarantees of the locking scheme and whether there is
some silent breakage lurking.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 44 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 44 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 7eef91d6c2b6..9dcd70cc3ca3 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -5740,47 +5740,3 @@ int btrfs_trim_fs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct fstrim_range *range) return bg_ret; return dev_ret; } - -/* - * btrfs_{start,end}_write_no_snapshotting() are similar to - * mnt_{want,drop}_write(), they are used to prevent some tasks from writing - * data into the page cache through nocow before the subvolume is snapshoted, - * but flush the data into disk after the snapshot creation, or to prevent - * operations while snapshotting is ongoing and that cause the snapshot to be - * inconsistent (writes followed by expanding truncates for example). - */ -void btrfs_end_write_no_snapshotting(struct btrfs_root *root) -{ - percpu_counter_dec(&root->subv_writers->counter); - cond_wake_up(&root->subv_writers->wait); -} - -int btrfs_start_write_no_snapshotting(struct btrfs_root *root) -{ - if (atomic_read(&root->will_be_snapshotted)) - return 0; - - percpu_counter_inc(&root->subv_writers->counter); - /* - * Make sure counter is updated before we check for snapshot creation. - */ - smp_mb(); - if (atomic_read(&root->will_be_snapshotted)) { - btrfs_end_write_no_snapshotting(root); - return 0; - } - return 1; -} - -void btrfs_wait_for_snapshot_creation(struct btrfs_root *root) -{ - while (true) { - int ret; - - ret = btrfs_start_write_no_snapshotting(root); - if (ret) - break; - wait_var_event(&root->will_be_snapshotted, - !atomic_read(&root->will_be_snapshotted)); - } -} |