diff options
author | Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> | 2022-03-25 19:11:43 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> | 2022-03-26 02:51:16 +0300 |
commit | 481f541ced8fcf9af87bedf6f87c2023de22bf6e (patch) | |
tree | ac0388ce09a5489b480f1aa4e06bbf5524d3f0f7 /drivers | |
parent | 5f7e2af00807f2117650e711a58b7f0e986ce1df (diff) | |
download | linux-481f541ced8fcf9af87bedf6f87c2023de22bf6e.tar.xz |
clk: test: Test clk_set_rate_range on orphan mux
A bug recently affected the Tegra30 where calling clk_set_rate_range()
on a clock would make it change its rate to the minimum.
This was due to the clock in question being a mux that was orphan at
registration, which lead to the clk_core req_rate being 0, and the
clk_set_rate_range() function then calling clk_set_rate() with req_rate,
effectively making that clock running at the minimum rate allowed, even
though the initial rate was within that range.
Make a test suite to create a mux initially orphan, and then make sure
that if our clock rate was initially within a given range, then
enforcing that range won't affect it.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220325161144.1901695-3-maxime@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 105 |
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c index 48f95d1784c8..6731a822f4e3 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c @@ -72,6 +72,19 @@ static int clk_dummy_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, return 0; } +static int clk_dummy_single_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index) +{ + if (index >= clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw)) + return -EINVAL; + + return 0; +} + +static u8 clk_dummy_single_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + return 0; +} + static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_rate_ops = { .recalc_rate = clk_dummy_recalc_rate, .determine_rate = clk_dummy_determine_rate, @@ -90,6 +103,11 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_minimize_rate_ops = { .set_rate = clk_dummy_set_rate, }; +static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_single_parent_ops = { + .set_parent = clk_dummy_single_set_parent, + .get_parent = clk_dummy_single_get_parent, +}; + static int clk_test_init_with_ops(struct kunit *test, const struct clk_ops *ops) { struct clk_dummy_context *ctx; @@ -239,6 +257,92 @@ static struct kunit_suite clk_test_suite = { .test_cases = clk_test_cases, }; +struct clk_single_parent_ctx { + struct clk_dummy_context parent_ctx; + struct clk_hw hw; +}; + +static int clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx; + struct clk_init_data init = { }; + const char * const parents[] = { "orphan_parent" }; + int ret; + + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + test->priv = ctx; + + init.name = "test_orphan_dummy_parent"; + init.ops = &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops; + init.parent_names = parents; + init.num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(parents); + init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT; + ctx->hw.init = &init; + + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + memset(&init, 0, sizeof(init)); + init.name = "orphan_parent"; + init.ops = &clk_dummy_rate_ops; + ctx->parent_ctx.hw.init = &init; + ctx->parent_ctx.rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE; + + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_ctx.hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static void clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw); + clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw); +} + +/* + * Test that a mux-only clock, with an initial rate within a range, + * will still have the same rate after the range has been enforced. + */ +static void clk_test_orphan_transparent_parent_mux_set_range(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv; + struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw; + struct clk *clk = hw->clk; + unsigned long rate, new_rate; + + rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, + clk_set_rate_range(clk, + ctx->parent_ctx.rate - 1000, + ctx->parent_ctx.rate + 1000), + 0); + + new_rate = clk_get_rate(clk); + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, new_rate, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rate, new_rate); +} + +static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_orphan_transparent_parent_mux_set_range), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite = { + .name = "clk-orphan-transparent-single-parent-test", + .init = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init, + .exit = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_exit, + .test_cases = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases, +}; + /* * Test that clk_set_rate_range won't return an error for a valid range * and that it will make sure the rate of the clock is within the @@ -788,6 +892,7 @@ static struct kunit_suite clk_range_minimize_test_suite = { kunit_test_suites( &clk_test_suite, + &clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite, &clk_range_test_suite, &clk_range_maximize_test_suite, &clk_range_minimize_test_suite |