summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/misc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>2012-08-22 23:03:57 +0400
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2012-09-06 01:10:29 +0400
commitd6ae0d578d24303941c1424b049d2cae28277666 (patch)
tree408e4d6d19acc44353761517731c5ce486e4882e /drivers/misc
parent9af514232e9e74cbcd24700fc321b7c71a536568 (diff)
downloadlinux-d6ae0d578d24303941c1424b049d2cae28277666.tar.xz
misc/at25, dt: Improve at25 SPI eeprom device tree bindings.
Commit 002176db (misc: at25: Parse dt settings) added device tree bindings the differ significantly in style from the I2C EEPROM bindings and don't seem well vetted. Here I deprecate (but still support) the "at25,*" properties, and add what I hope is a better alternative. These new bindings also happen to be deployed in the field and were previously submitted for consideration here: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-May/015556.html The advantages of the new bindings are that they are similar to the I2C EEPROMs and they don't conflate read-only and the address width modes in a binary encoded blob. Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com> Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/misc')
-rw-r--r--drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c83
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c
index 25003d6ceb56..4ed93dd54116 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c
@@ -302,6 +302,61 @@ static ssize_t at25_mem_write(struct memory_accessor *mem, const char *buf,
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
+static int at25_np_to_chip(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_node *np,
+ struct spi_eeprom *chip)
+{
+ u32 val;
+
+ memset(chip, 0, sizeof(*chip));
+ strncpy(chip->name, np->name, sizeof(chip->name));
+
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "size", &val) == 0 ||
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,byte-len", &val) == 0) {
+ chip->byte_len = val;
+ } else {
+ dev_err(dev, "Error: missing \"size\" property\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "pagesize", &val) == 0 ||
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,page-size", &val) == 0) {
+ chip->page_size = (u16)val;
+ } else {
+ dev_err(dev, "Error: missing \"pagesize\" property\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,addr-mode", &val) == 0) {
+ chip->flags = (u16)val;
+ } else {
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "address-width", &val)) {
+ dev_err(dev,
+ "Error: missing \"address-width\" property\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ switch (val) {
+ case 8:
+ chip->flags |= EE_ADDR1;
+ break;
+ case 16:
+ chip->flags |= EE_ADDR2;
+ break;
+ case 24:
+ chip->flags |= EE_ADDR3;
+ break;
+ default:
+ dev_err(dev,
+ "Error: bad \"address-width\" property: %u\n",
+ val);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ if (of_find_property(np, "read-only", NULL))
+ chip->flags |= EE_READONLY;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int at25_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct at25_data *at25 = NULL;
@@ -314,33 +369,11 @@ static int at25_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
/* Chip description */
if (!spi->dev.platform_data) {
if (np) {
- u32 val;
-
- memset(&chip, 0, sizeof(chip));
- strncpy(chip.name, np->name, 10);
-
- err = of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,byte-len", &val);
- if (err) {
- dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "invalid chip dt description\n");
- goto fail;
- }
- chip.byte_len = val;
-
- err = of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,addr-mode", &val);
- if (err) {
- dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "invalid chip dt description\n");
- goto fail;
- }
- chip.flags = (u16)val;
-
- err = of_property_read_u32(np, "at25,page-size", &val);
- if (err) {
- dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "invalid chip dt description\n");
+ err = at25_np_to_chip(&spi->dev, np, &chip);
+ if (err)
goto fail;
- }
- chip.page_size = (u16)val;
} else {
- dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "no chip description\n");
+ dev_err(&spi->dev, "Error: no chip description\n");
err = -ENODEV;
goto fail;
}