diff options
author | Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> | 2009-07-31 02:03:45 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> | 2009-07-30 10:33:45 +0400 |
commit | 2e04ef76916d1e29a077ea9d0f2003c8fd86724d (patch) | |
tree | 2ff8d625d6e467be9f9f1b67a3674cb6e125e970 /drivers/lguest/x86 | |
parent | e969fed542cae08cb11d666efac4f7c5d624d09f (diff) | |
download | linux-2e04ef76916d1e29a077ea9d0f2003c8fd86724d.tar.xz |
lguest: fix comment style
I don't really notice it (except to begrudge the extra vertical
space), but Ingo does. And he pointed out that one excuse of lguest
is as a teaching tool, it should set a good example.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/lguest/x86')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/lguest/x86/core.c | 372 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S | 18 |
2 files changed, 257 insertions, 133 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c b/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c index eaf722fe309a..96f7d88ec7f8 100644 --- a/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c +++ b/drivers/lguest/x86/core.c @@ -17,13 +17,15 @@ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. */ -/*P:450 This file contains the x86-specific lguest code. It used to be all +/*P:450 + * This file contains the x86-specific lguest code. It used to be all * mixed in with drivers/lguest/core.c but several foolhardy code slashers * wrestled most of the dependencies out to here in preparation for porting * lguest to other architectures (see what I mean by foolhardy?). * * This also contains a couple of non-obvious setup and teardown pieces which - * were implemented after days of debugging pain. :*/ + * were implemented after days of debugging pain. +:*/ #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/start_kernel.h> #include <linux/string.h> @@ -82,25 +84,33 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct lg_cpu *, last_cpu); */ static void copy_in_guest_info(struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct lguest_pages *pages) { - /* Copying all this data can be quite expensive. We usually run the + /* + * Copying all this data can be quite expensive. We usually run the * same Guest we ran last time (and that Guest hasn't run anywhere else * meanwhile). If that's not the case, we pretend everything in the - * Guest has changed. */ + * Guest has changed. + */ if (__get_cpu_var(last_cpu) != cpu || cpu->last_pages != pages) { __get_cpu_var(last_cpu) = cpu; cpu->last_pages = pages; cpu->changed = CHANGED_ALL; } - /* These copies are pretty cheap, so we do them unconditionally: */ - /* Save the current Host top-level page directory. */ + /* + * These copies are pretty cheap, so we do them unconditionally: */ + /* Save the current Host top-level page directory. + */ pages->state.host_cr3 = __pa(current->mm->pgd); - /* Set up the Guest's page tables to see this CPU's pages (and no - * other CPU's pages). */ + /* + * Set up the Guest's page tables to see this CPU's pages (and no + * other CPU's pages). + */ map_switcher_in_guest(cpu, pages); - /* Set up the two "TSS" members which tell the CPU what stack to use + /* + * Set up the two "TSS" members which tell the CPU what stack to use * for traps which do directly into the Guest (ie. traps at privilege - * level 1). */ + * level 1). + */ pages->state.guest_tss.sp1 = cpu->esp1; pages->state.guest_tss.ss1 = cpu->ss1; @@ -125,40 +135,53 @@ static void run_guest_once(struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct lguest_pages *pages) /* This is a dummy value we need for GCC's sake. */ unsigned int clobber; - /* Copy the guest-specific information into this CPU's "struct - * lguest_pages". */ + /* + * Copy the guest-specific information into this CPU's "struct + * lguest_pages". + */ copy_in_guest_info(cpu, pages); - /* Set the trap number to 256 (impossible value). If we fault while + /* + * Set the trap number to 256 (impossible value). If we fault while * switching to the Guest (bad segment registers or bug), this will - * cause us to abort the Guest. */ + * cause us to abort the Guest. + */ cpu->regs->trapnum = 256; - /* Now: we push the "eflags" register on the stack, then do an "lcall". + /* + * Now: we push the "eflags" register on the stack, then do an "lcall". * This is how we change from using the kernel code segment to using * the dedicated lguest code segment, as well as jumping into the * Switcher. * * The lcall also pushes the old code segment (KERNEL_CS) onto the * stack, then the address of this call. This stack layout happens to - * exactly match the stack layout created by an interrupt... */ + * exactly match the stack layout created by an interrupt... + */ asm volatile("pushf; lcall *lguest_entry" - /* This is how we tell GCC that %eax ("a") and %ebx ("b") - * are changed by this routine. The "=" means output. */ + /* + * This is how we tell GCC that %eax ("a") and %ebx ("b") + * are changed by this routine. The "=" means output. + */ : "=a"(clobber), "=b"(clobber) - /* %eax contains the pages pointer. ("0" refers to the + /* + * %eax contains the pages pointer. ("0" refers to the * 0-th argument above, ie "a"). %ebx contains the * physical address of the Guest's top-level page - * directory. */ + * directory. + */ : "0"(pages), "1"(__pa(cpu->lg->pgdirs[cpu->cpu_pgd].pgdir)) - /* We tell gcc that all these registers could change, + /* + * We tell gcc that all these registers could change, * which means we don't have to save and restore them in - * the Switcher. */ + * the Switcher. + */ : "memory", "%edx", "%ecx", "%edi", "%esi"); } /*:*/ -/*M:002 There are hooks in the scheduler which we can register to tell when we +/*M:002 + * There are hooks in the scheduler which we can register to tell when we * get kicked off the CPU (preempt_notifier_register()). This would allow us * to lazily disable SYSENTER which would regain some performance, and should * also simplify copy_in_guest_info(). Note that we'd still need to restore @@ -166,56 +189,72 @@ static void run_guest_once(struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct lguest_pages *pages) * * We could also try using this hooks for PGE, but that might be too expensive. * - * The hooks were designed for KVM, but we can also put them to good use. :*/ + * The hooks were designed for KVM, but we can also put them to good use. +:*/ -/*H:040 This is the i386-specific code to setup and run the Guest. Interrupts - * are disabled: we own the CPU. */ +/*H:040 + * This is the i386-specific code to setup and run the Guest. Interrupts + * are disabled: we own the CPU. + */ void lguest_arch_run_guest(struct lg_cpu *cpu) { - /* Remember the awfully-named TS bit? If the Guest has asked to set it + /* + * Remember the awfully-named TS bit? If the Guest has asked to set it * we set it now, so we can trap and pass that trap to the Guest if it - * uses the FPU. */ + * uses the FPU. + */ if (cpu->ts) unlazy_fpu(current); - /* SYSENTER is an optimized way of doing system calls. We can't allow + /* + * SYSENTER is an optimized way of doing system calls. We can't allow * it because it always jumps to privilege level 0. A normal Guest * won't try it because we don't advertise it in CPUID, but a malicious * Guest (or malicious Guest userspace program) could, so we tell the - * CPU to disable it before running the Guest. */ + * CPU to disable it before running the Guest. + */ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEP)) wrmsr(MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, 0, 0); - /* Now we actually run the Guest. It will return when something + /* + * Now we actually run the Guest. It will return when something * interesting happens, and we can examine its registers to see what it - * was doing. */ + * was doing. + */ run_guest_once(cpu, lguest_pages(raw_smp_processor_id())); - /* Note that the "regs" structure contains two extra entries which are + /* + * Note that the "regs" structure contains two extra entries which are * not really registers: a trap number which says what interrupt or * trap made the switcher code come back, and an error code which some - * traps set. */ + * traps set. + */ /* Restore SYSENTER if it's supposed to be on. */ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEP)) wrmsr(MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, __KERNEL_CS, 0); - /* If the Guest page faulted, then the cr2 register will tell us the + /* + * If the Guest page faulted, then the cr2 register will tell us the * bad virtual address. We have to grab this now, because once we * re-enable interrupts an interrupt could fault and thus overwrite - * cr2, or we could even move off to a different CPU. */ + * cr2, or we could even move off to a different CPU. + */ if (cpu->regs->trapnum == 14) cpu->arch.last_pagefault = read_cr2(); - /* Similarly, if we took a trap because the Guest used the FPU, + /* + * Similarly, if we took a trap because the Guest used the FPU, * we have to restore the FPU it expects to see. * math_state_restore() may sleep and we may even move off to * a different CPU. So all the critical stuff should be done - * before this. */ + * before this. + */ else if (cpu->regs->trapnum == 7) math_state_restore(); } -/*H:130 Now we've examined the hypercall code; our Guest can make requests. +/*H:130 + * Now we've examined the hypercall code; our Guest can make requests. * Our Guest is usually so well behaved; it never tries to do things it isn't * allowed to, and uses hypercalls instead. Unfortunately, Linux's paravirtual * infrastructure isn't quite complete, because it doesn't contain replacements @@ -225,26 +264,33 @@ void lguest_arch_run_guest(struct lg_cpu *cpu) * * When the Guest uses one of these instructions, we get a trap (General * Protection Fault) and come here. We see if it's one of those troublesome - * instructions and skip over it. We return true if we did. */ + * instructions and skip over it. We return true if we did. + */ static int emulate_insn(struct lg_cpu *cpu) { u8 insn; unsigned int insnlen = 0, in = 0, shift = 0; - /* The eip contains the *virtual* address of the Guest's instruction: - * guest_pa just subtracts the Guest's page_offset. */ + /* + * The eip contains the *virtual* address of the Guest's instruction: + * guest_pa just subtracts the Guest's page_offset. + */ unsigned long physaddr = guest_pa(cpu, cpu->regs->eip); - /* This must be the Guest kernel trying to do something, not userspace! + /* + * This must be the Guest kernel trying to do something, not userspace! * The bottom two bits of the CS segment register are the privilege - * level. */ + * level. + */ if ((cpu->regs->cs & 3) != GUEST_PL) return 0; /* Decoding x86 instructions is icky. */ insn = lgread(cpu, physaddr, u8); - /* 0x66 is an "operand prefix". It means it's using the upper 16 bits - of the eax register. */ + /* + * 0x66 is an "operand prefix". It means it's using the upper 16 bits + * of the eax register. + */ if (insn == 0x66) { shift = 16; /* The instruction is 1 byte so far, read the next byte. */ @@ -252,8 +298,10 @@ static int emulate_insn(struct lg_cpu *cpu) insn = lgread(cpu, physaddr + insnlen, u8); } - /* We can ignore the lower bit for the moment and decode the 4 opcodes - * we need to emulate. */ + /* + * We can ignore the lower bit for the moment and decode the 4 opcodes + * we need to emulate. + */ switch (insn & 0xFE) { case 0xE4: /* in <next byte>,%al */ insnlen += 2; @@ -274,9 +322,11 @@ static int emulate_insn(struct lg_cpu *cpu) return 0; } - /* If it was an "IN" instruction, they expect the result to be read + /* + * If it was an "IN" instruction, they expect the result to be read * into %eax, so we change %eax. We always return all-ones, which - * traditionally means "there's nothing there". */ + * traditionally means "there's nothing there". + */ if (in) { /* Lower bit tells is whether it's a 16 or 32 bit access */ if (insn & 0x1) @@ -290,7 +340,8 @@ static int emulate_insn(struct lg_cpu *cpu) return 1; } -/* Our hypercalls mechanism used to be based on direct software interrupts. +/* + * Our hypercalls mechanism used to be based on direct software interrupts. * After Anthony's "Refactor hypercall infrastructure" kvm patch, we decided to * change over to using kvm hypercalls. * @@ -318,16 +369,20 @@ static int emulate_insn(struct lg_cpu *cpu) */ static void rewrite_hypercall(struct lg_cpu *cpu) { - /* This are the opcodes we use to patch the Guest. The opcode for "int + /* + * This are the opcodes we use to patch the Guest. The opcode for "int * $0x1f" is "0xcd 0x1f" but vmcall instruction is 3 bytes long, so we - * complete the sequence with a NOP (0x90). */ + * complete the sequence with a NOP (0x90). + */ u8 insn[3] = {0xcd, 0x1f, 0x90}; __lgwrite(cpu, guest_pa(cpu, cpu->regs->eip), insn, sizeof(insn)); - /* The above write might have caused a copy of that page to be made + /* + * The above write might have caused a copy of that page to be made * (if it was read-only). We need to make sure the Guest has * up-to-date pagetables. As this doesn't happen often, we can just - * drop them all. */ + * drop them all. + */ guest_pagetable_clear_all(cpu); } @@ -335,9 +390,11 @@ static bool is_hypercall(struct lg_cpu *cpu) { u8 insn[3]; - /* This must be the Guest kernel trying to do something. + /* + * This must be the Guest kernel trying to do something. * The bottom two bits of the CS segment register are the privilege - * level. */ + * level. + */ if ((cpu->regs->cs & 3) != GUEST_PL) return false; @@ -351,86 +408,105 @@ void lguest_arch_handle_trap(struct lg_cpu *cpu) { switch (cpu->regs->trapnum) { case 13: /* We've intercepted a General Protection Fault. */ - /* Check if this was one of those annoying IN or OUT + /* + * Check if this was one of those annoying IN or OUT * instructions which we need to emulate. If so, we just go - * back into the Guest after we've done it. */ + * back into the Guest after we've done it. + */ if (cpu->regs->errcode == 0) { if (emulate_insn(cpu)) return; } - /* If KVM is active, the vmcall instruction triggers a - * General Protection Fault. Normally it triggers an - * invalid opcode fault (6): */ + /* + * If KVM is active, the vmcall instruction triggers a General + * Protection Fault. Normally it triggers an invalid opcode + * fault (6): + */ case 6: - /* We need to check if ring == GUEST_PL and - * faulting instruction == vmcall. */ + /* + * We need to check if ring == GUEST_PL and faulting + * instruction == vmcall. + */ if (is_hypercall(cpu)) { rewrite_hypercall(cpu); return; } break; case 14: /* We've intercepted a Page Fault. */ - /* The Guest accessed a virtual address that wasn't mapped. + /* + * The Guest accessed a virtual address that wasn't mapped. * This happens a lot: we don't actually set up most of the page * tables for the Guest at all when we start: as it runs it asks * for more and more, and we set them up as required. In this * case, we don't even tell the Guest that the fault happened. * * The errcode tells whether this was a read or a write, and - * whether kernel or userspace code. */ + * whether kernel or userspace code. + */ if (demand_page(cpu, cpu->arch.last_pagefault, cpu->regs->errcode)) return; - /* OK, it's really not there (or not OK): the Guest needs to + /* + * OK, it's really not there (or not OK): the Guest needs to * know. We write out the cr2 value so it knows where the * fault occurred. * * Note that if the Guest were really messed up, this could * happen before it's done the LHCALL_LGUEST_INIT hypercall, so - * lg->lguest_data could be NULL */ + * lg->lguest_data could be NULL + */ if (cpu->lg->lguest_data && put_user(cpu->arch.last_pagefault, &cpu->lg->lguest_data->cr2)) kill_guest(cpu, "Writing cr2"); break; case 7: /* We've intercepted a Device Not Available fault. */ - /* If the Guest doesn't want to know, we already restored the - * Floating Point Unit, so we just continue without telling - * it. */ + /* + * If the Guest doesn't want to know, we already restored the + * Floating Point Unit, so we just continue without telling it. + */ if (!cpu->ts) return; break; case 32 ... 255: - /* These values mean a real interrupt occurred, in which case + /* + * These values mean a real interrupt occurred, in which case * the Host handler has already been run. We just do a * friendly check if another process should now be run, then - * return to run the Guest again */ + * return to run the Guest again + */ cond_resched(); return; case LGUEST_TRAP_ENTRY: - /* Our 'struct hcall_args' maps directly over our regs: we set - * up the pointer now to indicate a hypercall is pending. */ + /* + * Our 'struct hcall_args' maps directly over our regs: we set + * up the pointer now to indicate a hypercall is pending. + */ cpu->hcall = (struct hcall_args *)cpu->regs; return; } /* We didn't handle the trap, so it needs to go to the Guest. */ if (!deliver_trap(cpu, cpu->regs->trapnum)) - /* If the Guest doesn't have a handler (either it hasn't + /* + * If the Guest doesn't have a handler (either it hasn't * registered any yet, or it's one of the faults we don't let - * it handle), it dies with this cryptic error message. */ + * it handle), it dies with this cryptic error message. + */ kill_guest(cpu, "unhandled trap %li at %#lx (%#lx)", cpu->regs->trapnum, cpu->regs->eip, cpu->regs->trapnum == 14 ? cpu->arch.last_pagefault : cpu->regs->errcode); } -/* Now we can look at each of the routines this calls, in increasing order of +/* + * Now we can look at each of the routines this calls, in increasing order of * complexity: do_hypercalls(), emulate_insn(), maybe_do_interrupt(), * deliver_trap() and demand_page(). After all those, we'll be ready to * examine the Switcher, and our philosophical understanding of the Host/Guest - * duality will be complete. :*/ + * duality will be complete. +:*/ static void adjust_pge(void *on) { if (on) @@ -439,13 +515,16 @@ static void adjust_pge(void *on) write_cr4(read_cr4() & ~X86_CR4_PGE); } -/*H:020 Now the Switcher is mapped and every thing else is ready, we need to do - * some more i386-specific initialization. */ +/*H:020 + * Now the Switcher is mapped and every thing else is ready, we need to do + * some more i386-specific initialization. + */ void __init lguest_arch_host_init(void) { int i; - /* Most of the i386/switcher.S doesn't care that it's been moved; on + /* + * Most of the i386/switcher.S doesn't care that it's been moved; on * Intel, jumps are relative, and it doesn't access any references to * external code or data. * @@ -453,7 +532,8 @@ void __init lguest_arch_host_init(void) * addresses are placed in a table (default_idt_entries), so we need to * update the table with the new addresses. switcher_offset() is a * convenience function which returns the distance between the - * compiled-in switcher code and the high-mapped copy we just made. */ + * compiled-in switcher code and the high-mapped copy we just made. + */ for (i = 0; i < IDT_ENTRIES; i++) default_idt_entries[i] += switcher_offset(); @@ -468,63 +548,81 @@ void __init lguest_arch_host_init(void) for_each_possible_cpu(i) { /* lguest_pages() returns this CPU's two pages. */ struct lguest_pages *pages = lguest_pages(i); - /* This is a convenience pointer to make the code fit one - * statement to a line. */ + /* This is a convenience pointer to make the code neater. */ struct lguest_ro_state *state = &pages->state; - /* The Global Descriptor Table: the Host has a different one + /* + * The Global Descriptor Table: the Host has a different one * for each CPU. We keep a descriptor for the GDT which says * where it is and how big it is (the size is actually the last - * byte, not the size, hence the "-1"). */ + * byte, not the size, hence the "-1"). + */ state->host_gdt_desc.size = GDT_SIZE-1; state->host_gdt_desc.address = (long)get_cpu_gdt_table(i); - /* All CPUs on the Host use the same Interrupt Descriptor + /* + * All CPUs on the Host use the same Interrupt Descriptor * Table, so we just use store_idt(), which gets this CPU's IDT - * descriptor. */ + * descriptor. + */ store_idt(&state->host_idt_desc); - /* The descriptors for the Guest's GDT and IDT can be filled + /* + * The descriptors for the Guest's GDT and IDT can be filled * out now, too. We copy the GDT & IDT into ->guest_gdt and - * ->guest_idt before actually running the Guest. */ + * ->guest_idt before actually running the Guest. + */ state->guest_idt_desc.size = sizeof(state->guest_idt)-1; state->guest_idt_desc.address = (long)&state->guest_idt; state->guest_gdt_desc.size = sizeof(state->guest_gdt)-1; state->guest_gdt_desc.address = (long)&state->guest_gdt; - /* We know where we want the stack to be when the Guest enters + /* + * We know where we want the stack to be when the Guest enters * the Switcher: in pages->regs. The stack grows upwards, so - * we start it at the end of that structure. */ + * we start it at the end of that structure. + */ state->guest_tss.sp0 = (long)(&pages->regs + 1); - /* And this is the GDT entry to use for the stack: we keep a - * couple of special LGUEST entries. */ + /* + * And this is the GDT entry to use for the stack: we keep a + * couple of special LGUEST entries. + */ state->guest_tss.ss0 = LGUEST_DS; - /* x86 can have a finegrained bitmap which indicates what I/O + /* + * x86 can have a finegrained bitmap which indicates what I/O * ports the process can use. We set it to the end of our - * structure, meaning "none". */ + * structure, meaning "none". + */ state->guest_tss.io_bitmap_base = sizeof(state->guest_tss); - /* Some GDT entries are the same across all Guests, so we can - * set them up now. */ + /* + * Some GDT entries are the same across all Guests, so we can + * set them up now. + */ setup_default_gdt_entries(state); /* Most IDT entries are the same for all Guests, too.*/ setup_default_idt_entries(state, default_idt_entries); - /* The Host needs to be able to use the LGUEST segments on this - * CPU, too, so put them in the Host GDT. */ + /* + * The Host needs to be able to use the LGUEST segments on this + * CPU, too, so put them in the Host GDT. + */ get_cpu_gdt_table(i)[GDT_ENTRY_LGUEST_CS] = FULL_EXEC_SEGMENT; get_cpu_gdt_table(i)[GDT_ENTRY_LGUEST_DS] = FULL_SEGMENT; } - /* In the Switcher, we want the %cs segment register to use the + /* + * In the Switcher, we want the %cs segment register to use the * LGUEST_CS GDT entry: we've put that in the Host and Guest GDTs, so * it will be undisturbed when we switch. To change %cs and jump we - * need this structure to feed to Intel's "lcall" instruction. */ + * need this structure to feed to Intel's "lcall" instruction. + */ lguest_entry.offset = (long)switch_to_guest + switcher_offset(); lguest_entry.segment = LGUEST_CS; - /* Finally, we need to turn off "Page Global Enable". PGE is an + /* + * Finally, we need to turn off "Page Global Enable". PGE is an * optimization where page table entries are specially marked to show * they never change. The Host kernel marks all the kernel pages this * way because it's always present, even when userspace is running. @@ -534,16 +632,21 @@ void __init lguest_arch_host_init(void) * you'll get really weird bugs that you'll chase for two days. * * I used to turn PGE off every time we switched to the Guest and back - * on when we return, but that slowed the Switcher down noticibly. */ + * on when we return, but that slowed the Switcher down noticibly. + */ - /* We don't need the complexity of CPUs coming and going while we're - * doing this. */ + /* + * We don't need the complexity of CPUs coming and going while we're + * doing this. + */ get_online_cpus(); if (cpu_has_pge) { /* We have a broader idea of "global". */ /* Remember that this was originally set (for cleanup). */ cpu_had_pge = 1; - /* adjust_pge is a helper function which sets or unsets the PGE - * bit on its CPU, depending on the argument (0 == unset). */ + /* + * adjust_pge is a helper function which sets or unsets the PGE + * bit on its CPU, depending on the argument (0 == unset). + */ on_each_cpu(adjust_pge, (void *)0, 1); /* Turn off the feature in the global feature set. */ clear_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_PGE); @@ -590,26 +693,32 @@ int lguest_arch_init_hypercalls(struct lg_cpu *cpu) { u32 tsc_speed; - /* The pointer to the Guest's "struct lguest_data" is the only argument. - * We check that address now. */ + /* + * The pointer to the Guest's "struct lguest_data" is the only argument. + * We check that address now. + */ if (!lguest_address_ok(cpu->lg, cpu->hcall->arg1, sizeof(*cpu->lg->lguest_data))) return -EFAULT; - /* Having checked it, we simply set lg->lguest_data to point straight + /* + * Having checked it, we simply set lg->lguest_data to point straight * into the Launcher's memory at the right place and then use * copy_to_user/from_user from now on, instead of lgread/write. I put * this in to show that I'm not immune to writing stupid - * optimizations. */ + * optimizations. + */ cpu->lg->lguest_data = cpu->lg->mem_base + cpu->hcall->arg1; - /* We insist that the Time Stamp Counter exist and doesn't change with + /* + * We insist that the Time Stamp Counter exist and doesn't change with * cpu frequency. Some devious chip manufacturers decided that TSC * changes could be handled in software. I decided that time going * backwards might be good for benchmarks, but it's bad for users. * * We also insist that the TSC be stable: the kernel detects unreliable - * TSCs for its own purposes, and we use that here. */ + * TSCs for its own purposes, and we use that here. + */ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) && !check_tsc_unstable()) tsc_speed = tsc_khz; else @@ -625,38 +734,47 @@ int lguest_arch_init_hypercalls(struct lg_cpu *cpu) } /*:*/ -/*L:030 lguest_arch_setup_regs() +/*L:030 + * lguest_arch_setup_regs() * * Most of the Guest's registers are left alone: we used get_zeroed_page() to - * allocate the structure, so they will be 0. */ + * allocate the structure, so they will be 0. + */ void lguest_arch_setup_regs(struct lg_cpu *cpu, unsigned long start) { struct lguest_regs *regs = cpu->regs; - /* There are four "segment" registers which the Guest needs to boot: + /* + * There are four "segment" registers which the Guest needs to boot: * The "code segment" register (cs) refers to the kernel code segment * __KERNEL_CS, and the "data", "extra" and "stack" segment registers * refer to the kernel data segment __KERNEL_DS. * * The privilege level is packed into the lower bits. The Guest runs - * at privilege level 1 (GUEST_PL).*/ + * at privilege level 1 (GUEST_PL). + */ regs->ds = regs->es = regs->ss = __KERNEL_DS|GUEST_PL; regs->cs = __KERNEL_CS|GUEST_PL; - /* The "eflags" register contains miscellaneous flags. Bit 1 (0x002) + /* + * The "eflags" register contains miscellaneous flags. Bit 1 (0x002) * is supposed to always be "1". Bit 9 (0x200) controls whether * interrupts are enabled. We always leave interrupts enabled while - * running the Guest. */ + * running the Guest. + */ regs->eflags = X86_EFLAGS_IF | 0x2; - /* The "Extended Instruction Pointer" register says where the Guest is - * running. */ + /* + * The "Extended Instruction Pointer" register says where the Guest is + * running. + */ regs->eip = start; - /* %esi points to our boot information, at physical address 0, so don't - * touch it. */ + /* + * %esi points to our boot information, at physical address 0, so don't + * touch it. + */ - /* There are a couple of GDT entries the Guest expects when first - * booting. */ + /* There are a couple of GDT entries the Guest expects at boot. */ setup_guest_gdt(cpu); } diff --git a/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S b/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S index 3fc15318a80f..6dec09793836 100644 --- a/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S +++ b/drivers/lguest/x86/switcher_32.S @@ -1,12 +1,15 @@ -/*P:900 This is the Switcher: code which sits at 0xFFC00000 astride both the +/*P:900 + * This is the Switcher: code which sits at 0xFFC00000 astride both the * Host and Guest to do the low-level Guest<->Host switch. It is as simple as * it can be made, but it's naturally very specific to x86. * * You have now completed Preparation. If this has whet your appetite; if you * are feeling invigorated and refreshed then the next, more challenging stage - * can be found in "make Guest". :*/ + * can be found in "make Guest". + :*/ -/*M:012 Lguest is meant to be simple: my rule of thumb is that 1% more LOC must +/*M:012 + * Lguest is meant to be simple: my rule of thumb is that 1% more LOC must * gain at least 1% more performance. Since neither LOC nor performance can be * measured beforehand, it generally means implementing a feature then deciding * if it's worth it. And once it's implemented, who can say no? @@ -31,11 +34,14 @@ * Host (which is actually really easy). * * Two questions remain. Would the performance gain outweigh the complexity? - * And who would write the verse documenting it? :*/ + * And who would write the verse documenting it? +:*/ -/*M:011 Lguest64 handles NMI. This gave me NMI envy (until I looked at their +/*M:011 + * Lguest64 handles NMI. This gave me NMI envy (until I looked at their * code). It's worth doing though, since it would let us use oprofile in the - * Host when a Guest is running. :*/ + * Host when a Guest is running. +:*/ /*S:100 * Welcome to the Switcher itself! |