summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>2015-03-13 00:50:36 +0300
committerDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>2015-03-13 00:53:10 +0300
commit877bef7de141db241e0c5d06db988b4ecbe29cf3 (patch)
tree7bea020aa908e9b21378429f5e0937c26bdff80b /drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
parentb6310affbe2bf14cbe6b6d28db48e1e37d52fbca (diff)
downloadlinux-877bef7de141db241e0c5d06db988b4ecbe29cf3.tar.xz
Input: sun4i-ts - really fix A10 temperature reporting
The commit titled: "Input: sun4i-ts - A10 (sun4i) has a different temperature curve" contains a math error, the offset it uses is in degrees, but the actual code applies the offset before multiplying by stepsize :| Given that this is rather backwards (every math course ever thought applies the multiplication before the offset for linear functions), this commit fixes things by changing the code applying the offset to do the logical thing, adjusting the offset for the other models accordingly. This has been tested on an A10, A13, A20 and A31 to make sure everything really is correct now. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c14
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
index 66ccd5af537d..178d2efb8353 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int sun4i_get_temp(const struct sun4i_ts_data *ts, long *temp)
if (ts->temp_data == -1)
return -EAGAIN;
- *temp = (ts->temp_data - ts->temp_offset) * ts->temp_step;
+ *temp = ts->temp_data * ts->temp_step - ts->temp_offset;
return 0;
}
@@ -255,17 +255,17 @@ static int sun4i_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ts->ignore_fifo_data = true;
ts->temp_data = -1;
if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ts")) {
- /* Allwinner SDK has temperature = -271 + (value / 6) (C) */
- ts->temp_offset = 1626;
+ /* Allwinner SDK has temperature (C) = (value / 6) - 271 */
+ ts->temp_offset = 271000;
ts->temp_step = 167;
} else if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun4i-a10-ts")) {
/*
* The A10 temperature sensor has quite a wide spread, these
* parameters are based on the averaging of the calibration
* results of 4 completely different boards, with a spread of
- * temp_step from 96 - 170 and temp_offset from 1758 - 3310.
+ * temp_step from 0.096 - 0.170 and temp_offset from 176 - 331.
*/
- ts->temp_offset = 2570;
+ ts->temp_offset = 257000;
ts->temp_step = 133;
} else {
/*
@@ -273,13 +273,13 @@ static int sun4i_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* the temperature. The formula used here is from the AXP209,
* which is designed by X-Powers, an affiliate of Allwinner:
*
- * temperature = -144.7 + (value * 0.1)
+ * temperature (C) = (value * 0.1) - 144.7
*
* Allwinner does not have any documentation whatsoever for
* this hardware. Moreover, it is claimed that the sensor
* is inaccurate and cannot work properly.
*/
- ts->temp_offset = 1447;
+ ts->temp_offset = 144700;
ts->temp_step = 100;
}