diff options
| author | Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> | 2013-01-11 16:43:45 +0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2013-01-26 03:39:12 +0400 |
| commit | 43720bd6014327ac454434496cb953edcdb9f8d6 (patch) | |
| tree | be134a588abb3164b7c5f9093707e536f9c54a05 /drivers/cpuidle | |
| parent | ed1ac6e91a3ff7c561008ba57747cd6cbc49385e (diff) | |
| download | linux-43720bd6014327ac454434496cb953edcdb9f8d6.tar.xz | |
PM / tracing: remove deprecated power trace API
The text in Documentation said it would be removed in 2.6.41;
the text in the Kconfig said removal in the 3.1 release. Either
way you look at it, we are well past both, so push it off a cliff.
Note that the POWER_CSTATE and the POWER_PSTATE are part of the
legacy tracing API. Remove all tracepoints which use these flags.
As can be seen from context, most already have a trace entry via
trace_cpu_idle anyways.
Also, the cpufreq/cpufreq.c PSTATE one is actually unpaired, as
compared to the CSTATE ones which all have a clear start/stop.
As part of this, the trace_power_frequency also becomes orphaned,
so it too is deleted.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpuidle')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c index e1f6860e069c..eba69290e074 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c @@ -144,7 +144,6 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void) return 0; } - trace_power_start_rcuidle(POWER_CSTATE, next_state, dev->cpu); trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(next_state, dev->cpu); if (cpuidle_state_is_coupled(dev, drv, next_state)) @@ -153,7 +152,6 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void) else entered_state = cpuidle_enter_state(dev, drv, next_state); - trace_power_end_rcuidle(dev->cpu); trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu); /* give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome */ |