diff options
| author | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2017-12-18 04:15:32 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2017-12-18 14:09:39 +0300 |
| commit | 56026645e2b6f11ede34a5e6ab69d3eb56f9c8fc (patch) | |
| tree | 4cf4a458d91fe51a6a2d41b05354776bdb0e0933 /drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | |
| parent | ccc153a6de1f7741b5ef7c996f9be133772b2092 (diff) | |
| download | linux-56026645e2b6f11ede34a5e6ab69d3eb56f9c8fc.tar.xz | |
cpufreq: governor: Ensure sufficiently large sampling intervals
After commit aa7519af450d (cpufreq: Use transition_delay_us for legacy
governors as well) the sampling_rate field of struct dbs_data may be
less than the tick period which causes dbs_update() to produce
incorrect results, so make the code ensure that the value of that
field will always be sufficiently large.
Fixes: aa7519af450d (cpufreq: Use transition_delay_us for legacy governors as well)
Reported-by: Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com>
Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Tested-by: Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c index 58d4f4e1ad6a..ca38229b045a 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ #include "cpufreq_governor.h" +#define CPUFREQ_DBS_MIN_SAMPLING_INTERVAL (2 * TICK_NSEC / NSEC_PER_USEC) + static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info, cpu_dbs); static DEFINE_MUTEX(gov_dbs_data_mutex); @@ -47,11 +49,15 @@ ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, const char *buf, { struct dbs_data *dbs_data = to_dbs_data(attr_set); struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs; + unsigned int sampling_interval; int ret; - ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &dbs_data->sampling_rate); - if (ret != 1) + + ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &sampling_interval); + if (ret != 1 || sampling_interval < CPUFREQ_DBS_MIN_SAMPLING_INTERVAL) return -EINVAL; + dbs_data->sampling_rate = sampling_interval; + /* * We are operating under dbs_data->mutex and so the list and its * entries can't be freed concurrently. @@ -430,7 +436,14 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (ret) goto free_policy_dbs_info; - dbs_data->sampling_rate = cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(policy); + /* + * The sampling interval should not be less than the transition latency + * of the CPU and it also cannot be too small for dbs_update() to work + * correctly. + */ + dbs_data->sampling_rate = max_t(unsigned int, + CPUFREQ_DBS_MIN_SAMPLING_INTERVAL, + cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(policy)); if (!have_governor_per_policy()) gov->gdbs_data = dbs_data; |