diff options
| author | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> | 2016-11-08 08:36:33 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2016-11-11 03:48:33 +0300 |
| commit | 26f0dbc9ab158afe86bac5ece2fcaf873d6bd8ad (patch) | |
| tree | 68e7825b864a9098de60134e74903f6d3e7e2f75 /drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | |
| parent | 20b15b7663549b34abcb4a18f16fedb239406c41 (diff) | |
| download | linux-26f0dbc9ab158afe86bac5ece2fcaf873d6bd8ad.tar.xz | |
cpufreq: governor: Don't use 'timer' keyword
The earlier implementation of governors used background timers and so
functions, mutex, etc had 'timer' keyword in their names.
But that's not true anymore. Replace 'timer' with 'update', as those
functions, variables are based around updates to frequency.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c index 642dd0f183a8..372947416b75 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, const char *buf, * entries can't be freed concurrently. */ list_for_each_entry(policy_dbs, &attr_set->policy_list, list) { - mutex_lock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex); + mutex_lock(&policy_dbs->update_mutex); /* * On 32-bit architectures this may race with the * sample_delay_ns read in dbs_update_util_handler(), but that @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, const char *buf, * taken, so it shouldn't be significant. */ gov_update_sample_delay(policy_dbs, 0); - mutex_unlock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&policy_dbs->update_mutex); } return count; @@ -236,9 +236,9 @@ static void dbs_work_handler(struct work_struct *work) * Make sure cpufreq_governor_limits() isn't evaluating load or the * ondemand governor isn't updating the sampling rate in parallel. */ - mutex_lock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex); - gov_update_sample_delay(policy_dbs, gov->gov_dbs_timer(policy)); - mutex_unlock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex); + mutex_lock(&policy_dbs->update_mutex); + gov_update_sample_delay(policy_dbs, gov->gov_dbs_update(policy)); + mutex_unlock(&policy_dbs->update_mutex); /* Allow the utilization update handler to queue up more work. */ atomic_set(&policy_dbs->work_count, 0); @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static struct policy_dbs_info *alloc_policy_dbs_info(struct cpufreq_policy *poli return NULL; policy_dbs->policy = policy; - mutex_init(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex); + mutex_init(&policy_dbs->update_mutex); atomic_set(&policy_dbs->work_count, 0); init_irq_work(&policy_dbs->irq_work, dbs_irq_work); INIT_WORK(&policy_dbs->work, dbs_work_handler); @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static void free_policy_dbs_info(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs, { int j; - mutex_destroy(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex); + mutex_destroy(&policy_dbs->update_mutex); for_each_cpu(j, policy_dbs->policy->related_cpus) { struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs, j); @@ -547,10 +547,10 @@ void cpufreq_dbs_governor_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data; - mutex_lock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex); + mutex_lock(&policy_dbs->update_mutex); cpufreq_policy_apply_limits(policy); gov_update_sample_delay(policy_dbs, 0); - mutex_unlock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&policy_dbs->update_mutex); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_dbs_governor_limits); |