diff options
| author | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> | 2011-08-06 02:34:08 +0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> | 2011-08-06 06:15:18 +0400 |
| commit | 69d94ec6d83d84044252d9ba03f6a8970816e350 (patch) | |
| tree | 3749073c792366acba59bede614db2200ef99d08 /drivers/acpi/battery.c | |
| parent | eb03cb02b74df6dd0b653d5f6d976f16a434dfaf (diff) | |
| download | linux-69d94ec6d83d84044252d9ba03f6a8970816e350.tar.xz | |
Battery: sysfs_remove_battery(): possible circular locking
Commit 9c921c22a7f33397a6774d7fa076db9b6a0fd669
Author: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
ACPI / Battery: Resolve the race condition in the sysfs_remove_battery()
fixed BUG https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35642 , but as a side
effect made lockdep unhappy with sysfs_remove_battery():
[14818.477168]
[14818.477170] =======================================================
[14818.477200] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[14818.477221] 3.1.0-dbg-07865-g1280ea8-dirty #668
[14818.477236] -------------------------------------------------------
[14818.477257] s2ram/1599 is trying to acquire lock:
[14818.477276] (s_active#8){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff81169147>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x5a
[14818.477323]
[14818.477325] but task is already holding lock:
[14818.477350] (&battery->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0047278>] sysfs_remove_battery+0x10/0x4b [battery]
[14818.477395]
[14818.477397] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[14818.477399]
[..]
[14818.479121] stack backtrace:
[14818.479148] Pid: 1599, comm: s2ram Not tainted 3.1.0-dbg-07865-g1280ea8-dirty #668
[14818.479175] Call Trace:
[14818.479198] [<ffffffff814828c3>] print_circular_bug+0x293/0x2a4
[14818.479228] [<ffffffff81070cb5>] __lock_acquire+0xfe4/0x164b
[14818.479260] [<ffffffff81169147>] ? sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x5a
[14818.479288] [<ffffffff810718d2>] lock_acquire+0x138/0x1ac
[14818.479316] [<ffffffff81169147>] ? sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x5a
[14818.479345] [<ffffffff81168a79>] sysfs_deactivate+0x9b/0xec
[14818.479373] [<ffffffff81169147>] ? sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x5a
[14818.479405] [<ffffffff81169147>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x31/0x5a
[14818.479433] [<ffffffff81167bc5>] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0x54/0x77
[14818.479461] [<ffffffff811681b9>] sysfs_remove_file+0x12/0x14
[14818.479488] [<ffffffff81385bf8>] device_remove_file+0x12/0x14
[14818.479516] [<ffffffff81386504>] device_del+0x119/0x17c
[14818.479542] [<ffffffff81386575>] device_unregister+0xe/0x1a
[14818.479570] [<ffffffff813c6ef9>] power_supply_unregister+0x23/0x27
[14818.479601] [<ffffffffa004729c>] sysfs_remove_battery+0x34/0x4b [battery]
[14818.479632] [<ffffffffa004778f>] battery_notify+0x2c/0x3a [battery]
[14818.479662] [<ffffffff8148fe82>] notifier_call_chain+0x74/0xa1
[14818.479692] [<ffffffff810624b4>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0x89
[14818.479722] [<ffffffff810624e0>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0xf/0x11
[14818.479751] [<ffffffff8107e40e>] pm_notifier_call_chain+0x15/0x27
[14818.479770] [<ffffffff8107ee1a>] enter_state+0xa7/0xd5
[14818.479782] [<ffffffff8107e341>] state_store+0xaa/0xc0
[14818.479795] [<ffffffff8107e297>] ? pm_async_store+0x45/0x45
[14818.479807] [<ffffffff81248837>] kobj_attr_store+0x17/0x19
[14818.479820] [<ffffffff81167e27>] sysfs_write_file+0x103/0x13f
[14818.479834] [<ffffffff81109037>] vfs_write+0xad/0x13d
[14818.479847] [<ffffffff811092b2>] sys_write+0x45/0x6c
[14818.479860] [<ffffffff81492f92>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
This patch introduces separate lock to struct acpi_battery to
grab in sysfs_remove_battery() instead of battery->lock.
So fix by Lan Tianyu is still there, we just grab independent lock.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi/battery.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/acpi/battery.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index ffce2f06dd8d..8953b7087091 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ enum { struct acpi_battery { struct mutex lock; + struct mutex sysfs_lock; struct power_supply bat; struct acpi_device *device; struct notifier_block pm_nb; @@ -573,16 +574,16 @@ static int sysfs_add_battery(struct acpi_battery *battery) static void sysfs_remove_battery(struct acpi_battery *battery) { - mutex_lock(&battery->lock); + mutex_lock(&battery->sysfs_lock); if (!battery->bat.dev) { - mutex_unlock(&battery->lock); + mutex_unlock(&battery->sysfs_lock); return; } device_remove_file(battery->bat.dev, &alarm_attr); power_supply_unregister(&battery->bat); battery->bat.dev = NULL; - mutex_unlock(&battery->lock); + mutex_unlock(&battery->sysfs_lock); } /* @@ -982,6 +983,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device) strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_BATTERY_CLASS); device->driver_data = battery; mutex_init(&battery->lock); + mutex_init(&battery->sysfs_lock); if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(battery->device->handle, "_BIX", &handle))) set_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_XINFO_PRESENT, &battery->flags); @@ -1010,6 +1012,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device) fail: sysfs_remove_battery(battery); mutex_destroy(&battery->lock); + mutex_destroy(&battery->sysfs_lock); kfree(battery); return result; } @@ -1027,6 +1030,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type) #endif sysfs_remove_battery(battery); mutex_destroy(&battery->lock); + mutex_destroy(&battery->sysfs_lock); kfree(battery); return 0; } |