x86 / hibernate: Use hlt_play_dead() when resuming from hibernation

On Intel hardware, native_play_dead() uses mwait_play_dead() by
default and only falls back to the other methods if that fails.
That also happens during resume from hibernation, when the restore
(boot) kernel runs disable_nonboot_cpus() to take all of the CPUs
except for the boot one offline.

However, that is problematic, because the address passed to
__monitor() in mwait_play_dead() is likely to be written to in the
last phase of hibernate image restoration and that causes the "dead"
CPU to start executing instructions again.  Unfortunately, the page
containing the address in that CPU's instruction pointer may not be
valid any more at that point.

First, that page may have been overwritten with image kernel memory
contents already, so the instructions the CPU attempts to execute may
simply be invalid.  Second, the page tables previously used by that
CPU may have been overwritten by image kernel memory contents, so the
address in its instruction pointer is impossible to resolve then.

A report from Varun Koyyalagunta and investigation carried out by
Chen Yu show that the latter sometimes happens in practice.

To prevent it from happening, temporarily change the smp_ops.play_dead
pointer during resume from hibernation so that it points to a special
"play dead" routine which uses hlt_play_dead() and avoids the
inadvertent "revivals" of "dead" CPUs this way.

A slightly unpleasant consequence of this change is that if the
system is hibernated with one or more CPUs offline, it will generally
draw more power after resume than it did before hibernation, because
the physical state entered by CPUs via hlt_play_dead() is higher-power
than the mwait_play_dead() one in the majority of cases.  It is
possible to work around this, but it is unclear how much of a problem
that's going to be in practice, so the workaround will be implemented
later if it turns out to be necessary.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106371
Reported-by: Varun Koyyalagunta <cpudebug@centtech.com>
Original-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

3 files changed, 32 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
index 66b057306f40..7427ca895a27 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ int native_cpu_up(unsigned int cpunum, struct task_struct *tidle);
 int native_cpu_disable(void);
 int common_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu);
 void native_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu);
+void hlt_play_dead(void);
 void native_play_dead(void);
 void play_dead_common(void);
 void wbinvd_on_cpu(int cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index fafe8b923cac..8264dfad9cf8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1622,7 +1622,7 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
 	}
 }
 
-static inline void hlt_play_dead(void)
+void hlt_play_dead(void)
 {
 	if (__this_cpu_read(cpu_info.x86) >= 4)
 		wbinvd();
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
index d5f64996394a..b12c26e2e309 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <linux/tboot.h>
 
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
 #include <asm/proto.h>
@@ -266,6 +267,35 @@ void notrace restore_processor_state(void)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(restore_processor_state);
 #endif
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_HIBERNATION) && defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
+static void resume_play_dead(void)
+{
+	play_dead_common();
+	tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_WFS);
+	hlt_play_dead();
+}
+
+int hibernate_resume_nonboot_cpu_disable(void)
+{
+	void (*play_dead)(void) = smp_ops.play_dead;
+	int ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * Ensure that MONITOR/MWAIT will not be used in the "play dead" loop
+	 * during hibernate image restoration, because it is likely that the
+	 * monitored address will be actually written to at that time and then
+	 * the "dead" CPU will attempt to execute instructions again, but the
+	 * address in its instruction pointer may not be possible to resolve
+	 * any more at that point (the page tables used by it previously may
+	 * have been overwritten by hibernate image data).
+	 */
+	smp_ops.play_dead = resume_play_dead;
+	ret = disable_nonboot_cpus();
+	smp_ops.play_dead = play_dead;
+	return ret;
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * When bsp_check() is called in hibernate and suspend, cpu hotplug
  * is disabled already. So it's unnessary to handle race condition between